Mitchell v Murray

Spud
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Mitchell v Murray

Post by Spud »

Anyone for Mitchell v Murray?

Dam good fight.

The fight could be made Mitchell boxes on sky so does Murray who is looking for big fights.
jBacca
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5563
Joined: 14 Sep 2008, 17:40

Re: Mitchell v Murray

Post by jBacca »

I still fancy Mitchell to outwork Murray, similar to McAllister, but he wont fold as easily.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Mitchell v Murray

Post by Autobarn »

who cares anymore?

you'd really have to wait for mitchell to regroup and be on some kind of winning run.

i rate murray higher than mitchell, always have, and i think murray will have his hands full with kudriavtsev, a quality operator and a great learning fight.
HomeOfBritishBoxing
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Mitchell v Murray

Post by HomeOfBritishBoxing »

Autobarn wrote:who cares anymore?

you'd really have to wait for mitchell to regroup and be on some kind of winning run.

i rate murray higher than mitchell, always have, and i think murray will have his hands full with kudriavtsev, a quality operator and a great learning fight.
who cares anymore? what a daft comment, all british boxing fans would love to see this fight!!
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Mitchell v Murray

Post by Asterix »

I would like Mitchell to get a couple of wins under his belt first, but then definitely. Great fight. It won't happen though.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Mitchell v Murray

Post by leforge »

Mitchell needs to regroup try and beat likes of watson at British level before fighting Murray wbo inter titles are meaningless. Murray will win this if they fight!
stevieb_8006
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Mitchell v Murray

Post by stevieb_8006 »

gavin rees? Limond may get the call? Doesnt he hold the prestigious one? (WBU)
idle talk
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 246
Joined: 19 Jul 2009, 11:56

Re: Mitchell v Murray

Post by idle talk »

watson v mitchell if the murray fight dosnt come off
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Mitchell v Murray

Post by Autobarn »

HomeOfBritishBoxing wrote:
Autobarn wrote:who cares anymore?

you'd really have to wait for mitchell to regroup and be on some kind of winning run.

i rate murray higher than mitchell, always have, and i think murray will have his hands full with kudriavtsev, a quality operator and a great learning fight.
who cares anymore? what a daft comment, all british boxing fans would love to see this fight!!
british boxing isn't about domestic clashes. it's about getting your fighter moved forward before he gets beaten or before someone else takes his place. despite what joe gallagher says about murray, khan and mitchell being the benn, eubank, watson. and this is backed up by the fights that we have been seeing. khan got his chance (incl a 2nd chance). mitchell had his chance. murray is gradually getting there. he has the EBU title and now the next step is a real european level contender, i would think.

this is a redundant thread and you might as well lock it, it's so pointless. what does mitchell offer murray, what's in it for murray? i bet, nothing.
el_grande_mauro_mina
Lightweight
Posts: 11215
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54

Re: Mitchell v Murray

Post by el_grande_mauro_mina »

Autobarn wrote:
i rate murray higher than mitchell, always have,
:lol:

Bloody hell, and don't we know it!

Its allright though Autobarn - this is what the forums are for - you stating the painfully obvious still made me chuckle!

PS: Who's to say Murray won't capitulate when facing similar class opposition? The only fighter to step up to world class and thrive is Amir Khan.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Mitchell v Murray

Post by Autobarn »

we'll have to see when he gets his chance.

i just don't see the gain in fighting someone who's just been done in 3 rounds. if mitchell had won the interim title, there would have been something in it for murray.

it's like jon thaxton. murray wanted the fight, didn't get it until thaxton had lost twice. i honestly think it's insulting to suddenly start with murray v mitchell threads.

mitchell - would he have ever got his big chances if khan hadn't left warren, anyway?
Coffee Aroma
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 96
Joined: 18 Jul 2007, 11:34

Re: Mitchell v Murray

Post by Coffee Aroma »

Autobarn wrote:who cares anymore?

you'd really have to wait for mitchell to regroup and be on some kind of winning run.

i rate murray higher than mitchell, always have, and i think murray will have his hands full with kudriavtsev, a quality operator and a great learning fight.
More inane babble from someone who would makes "the scarecrow" sound like Albert Einstein!
Oh..........if only he had a brain :roll:
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Mitchell v Murray

Post by Autobarn »

you're the one who comes across as inane, with your childish insults.

it's a fvcking stupid thread and has clearly attracted someone of that calibre to this thread.

and no, i don't mean myself.

your posts are about as meaningful and effective as a mitchell shoulder roll.
Coffee Aroma
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 96
Joined: 18 Jul 2007, 11:34

Re: Mitchell v Murray

Post by Coffee Aroma »

Autobarn wrote:you're the one who comes across as inane, with your childish insults.

it's a fvcking stupid thread and has clearly attracted someone of that calibre to this thread.

and no, i don't mean myself.

your posts are about as meaningful and effective as a mitchell shoulder roll.

"and no, i don't mean myself"

Well what the f*$k are you doing here?

What?..... you tripped over the carpet, nutted the keyboard and accidentally clicked the link to this thread jeeeezz...........you f*$kwit!!! :lol: :lol: :lol:

No.......more like your Napoleon complex kicked in: so you took a break from self abusing just long enough to gloat at the misfortune of another because it gives you a little buzz.

Anything you don't understand just ask a normal person......or google it!....absorb the bits you can understand then well.........join the dots..... Bingo :TU:

Before you know it you will have the IQ of a hamster; then you can work your way up from there........see easy.......anyway good luck with all that :wink:
Poncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7525
Joined: 21 May 2007, 07:48

Re: Mitchell v Murray

Post by Poncey »

Play nicely please.
Coffee Aroma
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 96
Joined: 18 Jul 2007, 11:34

Re: Mitchell v Murray

Post by Coffee Aroma »

Poncey wrote:Play nicely please.
Aw shucks :oops: ............I'm sorry :wink:
alexpaterson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4310
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22

Re: Mitchell v Murray

Post by alexpaterson »

This would be an intresting fight, I think Mitchell may take him head on. Katsidis cut off the ring well and Murray is fairly decent at cutting the ring off. I fancy Murray in a close, cracking fight.
winkveron
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 802
Joined: 08 Dec 2008, 12:31

Re: Mitchell v Murray

Post by winkveron »

Autobarn wrote:who cares anymore?

you'd really have to wait for mitchell to regroup and be on some kind of winning run.

i rate murray higher than mitchell, always have, and i think murray will have his hands full with kudriavtsev, a quality operator and a great learning fight.
What a sad state of affairs. Someone loses a fight against a world class fighter and we throw him on the scrap heap. No wonder people want to fight bums and pad out their records.
glahn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 992
Joined: 19 Nov 2005, 13:29

Re: Mitchell v Murray

Post by glahn »

I would want to see this fight. Mitchell could do with an interim fight against someone decent but beatable, just to get his confidence up again, but really they could fight each other next and I think it would be an entertaining scrap. They are both at about the same level for me, which is top Euro level for the most part and fringe world level on a good day.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Mitchell v Murray

Post by Autobarn »

winkveron wrote:
Autobarn wrote:who cares anymore?

you'd really have to wait for mitchell to regroup and be on some kind of winning run.

i rate murray higher than mitchell, always have, and i think murray will have his hands full with kudriavtsev, a quality operator and a great learning fight.
What a sad state of affairs. Someone loses a fight against a world class fighter and we throw him on the scrap heap. No wonder people want to fight bums and pad out their records.
i'll say it again. why should murray fight leftovers? this is my main pooint.

murray is far too hard a fight for mitchell after getting just knocked out.

we have to be realistic.
terminator
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 315
Joined: 04 May 2007, 13:00

Re: Mitchell v Murray

Post by terminator »

More chance of this happening than Murray vs Katsidis
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Mitchell v Murray

Post by Autobarn »

Coffee Aroma wrote:
Autobarn wrote:you're the one who comes across as inane, with your childish insults.

it's a fvcking stupid thread and has clearly attracted someone of that calibre to this thread.

and no, i don't mean myself.

your posts are about as meaningful and effective as a mitchell shoulder roll.

"and no, i don't mean myself"

Well what the f*$k are you doing here?

What?..... you tripped over the carpet, nutted the keyboard and accidentally clicked the link to this thread jeeeezz...........you f*$kwit!!! :lol: :lol: :lol:

No.......more like your Napoleon complex kicked in: so you took a break from self abusing just long enough to gloat at the misfortune of another because it gives you a little buzz.

Anything you don't understand just ask a normal person......or google it!....absorb the bits you can understand then well.........join the dots..... Bingo :TU:

Before you know it you will have the IQ of a hamster; then you can work your way up from there........see easy.......anyway good luck with all that :wink:
right, anyway. you've taken the mitchell defeat badly and you don't like me bringing up various stupidly optimistic mitchell is world class posts, just after the fight. you feel it is tactless and in bad taste. but i make valid points, backing them up with substance. if you want to keep on throwing insults, then there's no point arguing with you on normal terms, there's no point addressing you with respect...

you sound pretty sure mitchell will bounce back, but i'm sure you will calm down and settle for less. you will have to.

cheers c_unt

thanks wanker
TheCobra
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3450
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 15:11

Re: Mitchell v Murray

Post by TheCobra »

This would be a great domestic/euro tear-up, both like to bang a bit. I would take Murray as I think he is big at the weight and has a lot of power in those body shots but who knows Mitchell is pretty skilful at his level and may be able to outbox Murray. Would be a cracker but I agree with people saying this can't happen next, Mitchell has to re-group and try and get back to some level and build back to a euro title shot or something.
m1kee50
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4518
Joined: 04 Sep 2006, 11:07

Re: Mitchell v Murray

Post by m1kee50 »

Autobarn wrote:
british boxing isn't about domestic clashes. it's about getting your fighter moved forward before he gets beaten or before someone else takes his place. despite what joe gallagher says about murray, khan and mitchell being the benn, eubank, watson. and this is backed up by the fights that we have been seeing. khan got his chance (incl a 2nd chance). mitchell had his chance. murray is gradually getting there. he has the EBU title and now the next step is a real european level contender, i would think.
Agree... Khan and Mitchell got their shots lets let Murray have his... if they are going to be a new Benn/Watson/Eubank then fine but as Autobarn says that is not how the other two have been moved. Its not a fight Mitchell should walk into - get smashed in three then get an EBU title fight? that would be another sh1t call in a sport full of them

Murrays people I imagine will try to get him a nice easy defence next but hopefully they have seen what happened the weekend and realised that there are no shortcuts.
Coffee Aroma
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 96
Joined: 18 Jul 2007, 11:34

Re: Mitchell v Murray

Post by Coffee Aroma »

Autobarn wrote:
Coffee Aroma wrote:
Autobarn wrote:you're the one who comes across as inane, with your childish insults.

it's a fvcking stupid thread and has clearly attracted someone of that calibre to this thread.

and no, i don't mean myself.

your posts are about as meaningful and effective as a mitchell shoulder roll.

"and no, i don't mean myself"

Well what the f*$k are you doing here?

What?..... you tripped over the carpet, nutted the keyboard and accidentally clicked the link to this thread jeeeezz...........you f*$kwit!!! :lol: :lol: :lol:

No.......more like your Napoleon complex kicked in: so you took a break from self abusing just long enough to gloat at the misfortune of another because it gives you a little buzz.

Anything you don't understand just ask a normal person......or google it!....absorb the bits you can understand then well.........join the dots..... Bingo :TU:

Before you know it you will have the IQ of a hamster; then you can work your way up from there........see easy.......anyway good luck with all that :wink:
right, anyway. you've taken the mitchell defeat badly and you don't like me bringing up various stupidly optimistic mitchell is world class posts, just after the fight. you feel it is tactless and in bad taste. but i make valid points, backing them up with substance. if you want to keep on throwing insults, then there's no point arguing with you on normal terms, there's no point addressing you with respect...

you sound pretty sure mitchell will bounce back, but i'm sure you will calm down and settle for less. you will have to.

cheers c_unt

thanks wanker

Yeah I'm am gutted mitchell lost to a real heavy hitting warrior, who was: without doubt the much better man on the night, but on the up side; he will learn from it and return much stronger, focused and the much better for it, so yes; i will get over it.

But Kev's loss aside i cannot take seriously the steady stream of monotonous, banal and ill informed comments made by: obviously underachieving, cretinous morons!

If you are not of this ilk and feel you have been slighted and judged unjustly; If you feel my opinions are mere conjecture you must: at least admit they have been formed: based on much overwhelming evidence, and therefore must realise the electronic bile you spew puts you right in the reticule And with such a tempting target i just gotta sqeeze off a shot :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :evil:

Like the sign off :TU:......... Shows real maturity and a rapier-like wit! :lol: :lol: :lol:

TTFN Bozo....... :lol: :lol: :lol: You are so funny, you are like..... y'know: a special kind of stupid .
Boy you must practice a helluva lot :wink:
Post Reply