Rating the "J" Heavyweights

Post Reply
Mr E
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 349
Joined: 08 Sep 2009, 16:54

Rating the "J" Heavyweights

Post by Mr E »

I was musing the other day, apropos of nothing, that some first names are better represented in the annals of heavyweight history than others are, which got me to come up with these admittedly mindless lists:

Jacks:
1-Jack Dempsey
2-Jack Johnson
3-Jack Sharkey
4-Tiger Jack Fox
5-Jack Renault

Jims:
1-Jim Jeffries
2-Jim Corbett
3-Jimmy Young
4-Jimmy Ellis
5-Jimmy Bivins
[H/M-Jim Braddock]

Joes:
1-Joe Louis
2-Joe Frazier
3-Jersey Joe Walcott
4-Joe Jeannette
5-Joe Baksi
[H/M-Joe Bugner]

...and, throwing in a "J-Sound" list for good measure:

Georges:
1-George Foreman
2-George Godfrey (II)
3-George Chuvalo
4-Georges Carpentier
5-George Godfrey (I)
dempseyfire
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5534
Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56

Re: Rating the "J" Heavyweights

Post by dempseyfire »

Not bad, I'd rate Bivins above Ellis and Young though.

Good call on Joe Baski.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Rating the "J" Heavyweights

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

I have Johnson over Dempsey & agree with Bivins over Ellis.
Mr E
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 349
Joined: 08 Sep 2009, 16:54

Re: Rating the "J" Heavyweights

Post by Mr E »

Close calls all. In my first draft, I actually did have Bivins over Ellis but switched them at the last minute. You guys might be right.
hitman09
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1838
Joined: 13 Feb 2009, 10:39

Re: Rating the "J" Heavyweights

Post by hitman09 »

Pretty much agree with all of it, except that I'd rate Johnson over Dempsey.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Rating the "J" Heavyweights

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Dempsey caves in Johnson's face.
punchoutsb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5842
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05

Re: Rating the "J" Heavyweights

Post by punchoutsb »

I too would move Bivins up. The rest is good though.

And as for Dempsey/Johnson discussion, let me offer this. Johnson defense was superb. He had a real mastery of what he did. He never fought anyone like Dempsey though. Granted it was early in his career, but he was stopped by Joe Choynski. While Joe is one of my alltime favorite old timers, he was no Dempsey. I think Dempsey's swarming style would be far too quick and in your face for Johnson's defense style. Dempsey beats Johnson IMO, and most likely by stoppage.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Rating the "J" Heavyweights

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

Overwhelmingly, Dempsey's offense was just so much more aggressive, damaging, violent...it was just flat-out more, at every turn, than anything any Johnson opponent offered --- at least during Johnson's title reign, in his prime.

I could see Johnson learning how to deal with Dempsey in time, over repeated outings, but first-up? It's Dempsey, & it isn't close. I have never been especially high on Johnson, truth be told.
allworld80
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3468
Joined: 09 Dec 2006, 20:12

Re: Rating the "J" Heavyweights

Post by allworld80 »

Goodnight, Irene wrote:Dempsey caves in Johnson's face.
x2
funso banjo baby
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 23 Sep 2005, 11:05

Re: Rating the "J" Heavyweights

Post by funso banjo baby »

isnt Joe Jeanette a double score ?
Post Reply