I was musing the other day, apropos of nothing, that some first names are better represented in the annals of heavyweight history than others are, which got me to come up with these admittedly mindless lists:
Jacks:
1-Jack Dempsey
2-Jack Johnson
3-Jack Sharkey
4-Tiger Jack Fox
5-Jack Renault
Jims:
1-Jim Jeffries
2-Jim Corbett
3-Jimmy Young
4-Jimmy Ellis
5-Jimmy Bivins
[H/M-Jim Braddock]
Joes:
1-Joe Louis
2-Joe Frazier
3-Jersey Joe Walcott
4-Joe Jeannette
5-Joe Baksi
[H/M-Joe Bugner]
...and, throwing in a "J-Sound" list for good measure:
Georges:
1-George Foreman
2-George Godfrey (II)
3-George Chuvalo
4-Georges Carpentier
5-George Godfrey (I)
Rating the "J" Heavyweights
-
dempseyfire
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5534
- Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56
Re: Rating the "J" Heavyweights
Not bad, I'd rate Bivins above Ellis and Young though.
Good call on Joe Baski.
Good call on Joe Baski.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Rating the "J" Heavyweights
I have Johnson over Dempsey & agree with Bivins over Ellis.
Re: Rating the "J" Heavyweights
Close calls all. In my first draft, I actually did have Bivins over Ellis but switched them at the last minute. You guys might be right.
Re: Rating the "J" Heavyweights
Pretty much agree with all of it, except that I'd rate Johnson over Dempsey.
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Rating the "J" Heavyweights
Dempsey caves in Johnson's face.
-
punchoutsb
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5842
- Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05
Re: Rating the "J" Heavyweights
I too would move Bivins up. The rest is good though.
And as for Dempsey/Johnson discussion, let me offer this. Johnson defense was superb. He had a real mastery of what he did. He never fought anyone like Dempsey though. Granted it was early in his career, but he was stopped by Joe Choynski. While Joe is one of my alltime favorite old timers, he was no Dempsey. I think Dempsey's swarming style would be far too quick and in your face for Johnson's defense style. Dempsey beats Johnson IMO, and most likely by stoppage.
And as for Dempsey/Johnson discussion, let me offer this. Johnson defense was superb. He had a real mastery of what he did. He never fought anyone like Dempsey though. Granted it was early in his career, but he was stopped by Joe Choynski. While Joe is one of my alltime favorite old timers, he was no Dempsey. I think Dempsey's swarming style would be far too quick and in your face for Johnson's defense style. Dempsey beats Johnson IMO, and most likely by stoppage.
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: Rating the "J" Heavyweights
Overwhelmingly, Dempsey's offense was just so much more aggressive, damaging, violent...it was just flat-out more, at every turn, than anything any Johnson opponent offered --- at least during Johnson's title reign, in his prime.
I could see Johnson learning how to deal with Dempsey in time, over repeated outings, but first-up? It's Dempsey, & it isn't close. I have never been especially high on Johnson, truth be told.
I could see Johnson learning how to deal with Dempsey in time, over repeated outings, but first-up? It's Dempsey, & it isn't close. I have never been especially high on Johnson, truth be told.
-
allworld80
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3468
- Joined: 09 Dec 2006, 20:12
Re: Rating the "J" Heavyweights
x2Goodnight, Irene wrote:Dempsey caves in Johnson's face.
-
funso banjo baby
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4417
- Joined: 23 Sep 2005, 11:05
Re: Rating the "J" Heavyweights
isnt Joe Jeanette a double score ?