Okay, give me a match-up where a consensus lesser fighter beats a better one based on something you perceive…
This is not a thread about Hagler-Monzon, Leonard-Griffiths, Tunney-Moore, etc… where it’s acceptable to debate that either one would/could win.
This is a thread about why you think Jersey Joe Walcott beats Ali, or Tim Witherspoon beats Foreman…
When less is more....
Re: When less is more....
Not sure I'd rate Hopkins below Jones. They're too close really...BarryWashington wrote:I don't know if he would win, but; I'd be interested to see a prime Hopkins take on a prime Jones Jr. I think Hopkins would have enough to push at least a draw.Ezzard wrote:Okay, give me a match-up where a consensus lesser fighter beats a better one based on something you perceive…
This is not a thread about Hagler-Monzon, Leonard-Griffiths, Tunney-Moore, etc… where it’s acceptable to debate that either one would/could win.
This is a thread about why you think Jersey Joe Walcott beats Ali, or Tim Witherspoon beats Foreman…
I'd back Michael Moorer in his 175 days to beat Jones for the sake of this thread.