Undefeated lightweight Andy Murray
-
ApolloCreed
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 398
- Joined: 03 Mar 2008, 13:42
Undefeated lightweight Andy Murray
Has this lad got what it takes to beat his namesake John?
here he is in his last fight v Amir Unsworth:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJFkBT35dJM
here he is in his last fight v Amir Unsworth:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJFkBT35dJM
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Undefeated lightweight Andy Murray
heh. me and deno agree, here. I think that at least A-Muz would give J-Muz the most interesting fight he's had at title level, a better fight than Thaxton Buckland or former 2-time world champ lee McAllister gave him. nice clash of styles, would be an interesting little fight IMO
-
slapbangwhallop
- Heavyweight

Re: Undefeated lightweight Andy Murray
A-Muz would beat Buckland, McAllister and Thaxton as well but J-Muz is beyond that level now and was when he fought them as well.Counter-puncher wrote:heh. me and deno agree, here. I think that at least A-Muz would give J-Muz the most interesting fight he's had at title level, a better fight than Thaxton Buckland or former 2-time world champ lee McAllister gave him. nice clash of styles, would be an interesting little fight IMO
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Undefeated lightweight Andy Murray
probably true on both points. although i will only believe J-Muz's level being higher when he has hammered a European level fighter.
would it suprise you greatly if J-Muz's next opponent isn't any better than Buckland et al?
would it suprise you greatly if J-Muz's next opponent isn't any better than Buckland et al?
-
ApolloCreed
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 398
- Joined: 03 Mar 2008, 13:42
Re: Undefeated lightweight Andy Murray
SBW, what have you got against Andy Murray? Do you dislike him or just not rate him?
I think he's well-schooled and definitely improving and I'd give him a great shout against John Murray.
I think he's well-schooled and definitely improving and I'd give him a great shout against John Murray.
-
slapbangwhallop
- Heavyweight

Re: Undefeated lightweight Andy Murray
ApolloCreed wrote:SBW, what have you got against Andy Murray? Do you dislike him or just not rate him?
I think he's well-schooled and definitely improving and I'd give him a great shout against John Murray.
Code: Select all
I wish him well but he aint on J-Muz's level if I am honest.
-
ApolloCreed
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 398
- Joined: 03 Mar 2008, 13:42
Re: Undefeated lightweight Andy Murray
Do you regularly 'rant' at undefeated pro boxers with sterling amateur records when you're drunk?! 
Re: Undefeated lightweight Andy Murray
Christ Apollo, you were asking for peoples opinions on Andy Murray and when someone doesn't agree with your's, it automatically means they dislike Andy Murray.ApolloCreed wrote:Do you regularly 'rant' at undefeated pro boxers with sterling amateur records when you're drunk?!
Re: Undefeated lightweight Andy Murray
Yep, we discussed this before and I also think the clash of styles could be interesting. I'm not saying A.Murray would win but he has the ability to pose some questions of John.Counter-puncher wrote:heh. me and deno agree, here. I think that at least A-Muz would give J-Muz the most interesting fight he's had at title level, a better fight than Thaxton Buckland or former 2-time world champ lee McAllister gave him. nice clash of styles, would be an interesting little fight IMO
Hopefully Peters has something decent lined up for Andy, nearly 28, has an impressive looking record but one which holds a lack of substance. Time to step up and fight a top 5 European lightweight - Mezzache will be coming back from the States with his tail between his legs after dropping the EBU belt only to be stopped in 8 against a journeyman. Andy vs Mezzache, winner fights John Murray.
-
slapbangwhallop
- Heavyweight

Re: Undefeated lightweight Andy Murray
its certainly an unflattering trait, I agree, and one which is rather ill advised should one cherish ones good health and handsome unblemished youthful features.ApolloCreed wrote:Do you regularly 'rant' at undefeated pro boxers with sterling amateur records when you're drunk?!
Like I have said Andy is a very decent fighter and certainly improved considerably in the last year but is not on the same level of Murray. A-Muz is a classy upright boxer but is still relatively untested and I dont think his jab is strong enough to hold off J-Muz.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Undefeated lightweight Andy Murray
slappy you keep abbout talking J-Muz's higher level, i still say that remains to be proven, and banging former 2-weight world champ McAllister about doesn't prove it IMO
-
slapbangwhallop
- Heavyweight

Re: Undefeated lightweight Andy Murray
Its not who he has been per se but how he beat them and how he has looked beating them. I dare say I have seen more of A-Muz then yourself Cp (could be wrong) but I think J-Muz would overwhelm him.Counter-puncher wrote:slappy you keep abbout talking J-Muz's higher level, i still say that remains to be proven, and banging former 2-weight world champ McAllister about doesn't prove it IMO
I did say that A-Muz would also beat Buckland et al
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Undefeated lightweight Andy Murray
aye you could be right there- i've seen probably 4 A-Muz fights now
-
ApolloCreed
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 398
- Joined: 03 Mar 2008, 13:42
Re: Undefeated lightweight Andy Murray
No, deno, my point is that SBW is a huge fan of Irish boxing, has his own website and regularly comes on bigging up relatively poor Irish fighters.
I start a thread about a good one and his immediate response is 'no, close thread'.
Something odd there in my opinion!
I start a thread about a good one and his immediate response is 'no, close thread'.
Something odd there in my opinion!
-
slapbangwhallop
- Heavyweight

Re: Undefeated lightweight Andy Murray
damned if I do, damned if I dont.ApolloCreed wrote:No, deno, my point is that SBW is a huge fan of Irish boxing, has his own website and regularly comes on bigging up relatively poor Irish fighters.
I start a thread about a good one and his immediate response is 'no, close thread'.
Something odd there in my opinion!
-
ApolloCreed
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 398
- Joined: 03 Mar 2008, 13:42
Re: Undefeated lightweight Andy Murray
Next time you start a thread about some part-Irish bum living in Manchester, I'll come on and say 'close thread'.
Deal?
Deal?
-
slapbangwhallop
- Heavyweight

Re: Undefeated lightweight Andy Murray
yer a classy guy Apollo.ApolloCreed wrote:Next time you start a thread about some part-Irish bum living in Manchester, I'll come on and say 'close thread'.
Deal?
Since you are moaning like a premenstral biatch lets look at what I said.
PROS -
A-Muz would beat Buckland
A-Muz would beat McAllister
A-Muz would beat Thaxton
A-Muz is the least offensive guy on the planet
A-Muz has improved considerably in the last year
A-Muz is a classy upright boxer
CONS -
A-Muz is a level below J-Muz
A-Muz lack aggresion and confidence
A-Muz is still relatively untested
If you object to any of the points I've made then lets hear you, no need to have a pop at other fighter - not cool!
-
ApolloCreed
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 398
- Joined: 03 Mar 2008, 13:42
Re: Undefeated lightweight Andy Murray
It's your initial reaction:
'No. Close thread'.
Strange that a huge Irish boxing fan would react like that to a thread about an exciting Irish boxer.
Yes, you backtracked since, but just thought that was odd, seeing as I don't recall you ever dismissing any other Irish boxer like that before, however awful they are (and some are).
I agree totally that he is untested. John Murray is also untested.
Thaxton's shot isn't he? What's he at now?
'No. Close thread'.
Strange that a huge Irish boxing fan would react like that to a thread about an exciting Irish boxer.
Yes, you backtracked since, but just thought that was odd, seeing as I don't recall you ever dismissing any other Irish boxer like that before, however awful they are (and some are).
I agree totally that he is untested. John Murray is also untested.
Thaxton's shot isn't he? What's he at now?
-
slapbangwhallop
- Heavyweight

Re: Undefeated lightweight Andy Murray
I've backtracked on nothing - I foolishly pandered to you whinging like Pommy baby thats all.ApolloCreed wrote:It's your initial reaction:
'No. Close thread'.
Strange that a huge Irish boxing fan would react like that to a thread about an exciting Irish boxer.
Yes, you backtracked since, but just thought that was odd, seeing as I don't recall you ever dismissing any other Irish boxer like that before, however awful they are (and some are).
I agree totally that he is untested. John Murray is also untested.
Thaxton's shot isn't he? What's he at now?
Here is what I am saying - if A-Muz gets in the ring with J-Muz anytime soon he is going to he a beat of Buckland proportions - if you think that makes me "less of an Irish boxing fan" than before, well I'll just have to live with that.
If that pair do meet I will be supporting A-Muz no matter what his chances!
Now go and collect all you toys and put them back in your pram.
-
ApolloCreed
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 398
- Joined: 03 Mar 2008, 13:42
Re: Undefeated lightweight Andy Murray
I lose track of all the murray's in boxing.