Thought this might be interesting.
They weren't the very best heavyweights, but they were all very good. I thought they were all at least remotely close.
Rank them from best to worst. (Don't factor in anything they did at lower weight classes.)
James J.Corbett
Bob Fitzsimmons
Max Schmeling
Jack Sharkey
Max Baer
Ezzard Charles
Jersey Joe Walcott
Floyd Patterson
Ken Norton
Rank these heavyweights
-
dempseyfire
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5534
- Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56
Re: Rank these heavyweights
Factoring in accomplishments or just who beats who? I think putting them on their best night the likes of Walcott, Baer, Norton, Charles, Schmeling,Sharkey, and Corbett could've all beaten each other . . very evenly matched. I view Floyd and Fitz as a slight level below head to head.
-
Ambling Alp
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3627
- Joined: 15 Jul 2005, 22:31
Re: Rank these heavyweights
I guess really don't like the word "accomplishments" when rating fighters because I think many count paper titles as accomplisments.
Who had the best heavyweight career? ie- Factors b such as who beat the best opponents, the least bad losses etc. as well as looked the best on film taking into consideration that not much is available for Corbett and Fitz.
Who had the best heavyweight career? ie- Factors b such as who beat the best opponents, the least bad losses etc. as well as looked the best on film taking into consideration that not much is available for Corbett and Fitz.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Rank these heavyweights
Walcott
Charles
Schmeling
Norton
baer
Patterson
Sharkey
Fitzsimmons
Corbett
Charles
Schmeling
Norton
baer
Patterson
Sharkey
Fitzsimmons
Corbett
Re: Rank these heavyweights
Jersey Joe Walcott
Jack Sharkey
Max Schmeling
Ezzard Charles
Ken Norton
Bob Fitzsimmons
Floyd Patterson
James J.Corbett
Max Baer
Jack Sharkey
Max Schmeling
Ezzard Charles
Ken Norton
Bob Fitzsimmons
Floyd Patterson
James J.Corbett
Max Baer