it was really good - great technique, brisk pace, back and forth action. one of my faves. the rematch was won easily by mitchell, though.Counter-puncher wrote:i'll have to rewatch it some time, don't recall much of the fight at all, apart from Lopez trying to box with Mitchell and getting quietly outworkedAutobarn wrote:
brian mitchell's first fight - a controversial draw - with tony lopez was a superb boxing match.
no one raves about these fights, despite involving hall of famers in gruelling battles.
.[/b]
Classic Fights not given enough credit
Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit
-
Hagler2002
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3512
- Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04
Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit
It goes under the radar, a lot of boxing fans I know haven't seen it yet alone heard of it.Autobarn wrote:everyone's 2004 fight of the year?Hagler2002 wrote:Monshipour V's Sithchatchawal
Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit
he's never been in a bad fight
Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit
veeraphol sahaprom v hozumi hasegawa 1 - very intense.
and at a much lower level, lovemore n'dou v naoufel ben rabah, a seriously intense light welterweight title fight.
i really like mahyar monshipour v julio zarate. all out warfare. but i think with zarate being pulled out between rounds, it lacked the dramatic ending.
poonsawat v cordoba is absolute class, extremely close and very tough. how many non title fights are this good? a true, worthy world title eliminator. i believe the british ref who worked the fight was very impressed.
and at a much lower level, lovemore n'dou v naoufel ben rabah, a seriously intense light welterweight title fight.
i really like mahyar monshipour v julio zarate. all out warfare. but i think with zarate being pulled out between rounds, it lacked the dramatic ending.
poonsawat v cordoba is absolute class, extremely close and very tough. how many non title fights are this good? a true, worthy world title eliminator. i believe the british ref who worked the fight was very impressed.
-
MightyWarrior
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13262
- Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01
Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit
I thought Valero v Mosquera was even betterAutobarn wrote:everyone's 2004 fight of the year?Hagler2002 wrote:Monshipour V's Sithchatchawal
Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit
I enjoyed Froch/Taylor, but only for that ending.

Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit
and me, even more so when I picked up just over £500Dioufy wrote:I enjoyed Froch/Taylor, but only for that ending.
Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit
On what bet? KO in the 12th?Chambers2 wrote:and me, even more so when I picked up just over £500Dioufy wrote:I enjoyed Froch/Taylor, but only for that ending.
-
stevieb_8006
- Heavyweight

Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit
BY FAR THE MOST UNDERATED TRILOGY IS DENNIS ANDRIES VS JEFF HARDING!!!! WARS!!!
u just couldnt split them. also, i think Brodie vs Injin Chi 1 was a belter. I think it was just after Gomez vs Arthur and got overlooked.
Actually, Gomez vs Johansson was a little war while it lasted, the shell of Gomez giving absolutely everything.
Woods vs Johnson 3 was a great battle and personal triumph for Clinton.
We could be here all day really..... Joe C Vs Robin Reid.
Eubank vs Thompson, or as an earlier poster put, basically any of Carls fights. So underappreciated that fella.
u just couldnt split them. also, i think Brodie vs Injin Chi 1 was a belter. I think it was just after Gomez vs Arthur and got overlooked.
Actually, Gomez vs Johansson was a little war while it lasted, the shell of Gomez giving absolutely everything.
Woods vs Johnson 3 was a great battle and personal triumph for Clinton.
We could be here all day really..... Joe C Vs Robin Reid.
Eubank vs Thompson, or as an earlier poster put, basically any of Carls fights. So underappreciated that fella.
Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit
I really enjoyed Smith/Renda.

Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit
I had a bet on Froch to win, a bet on Froch to win by KO and and Froch to win in rounds 10-12Dioufy wrote:On what bet? KO in the 12th?Chambers2 wrote:and me, even more so when I picked up just over £500Dioufy wrote:I enjoyed Froch/Taylor, but only for that ending.
It had me jumping round the living like a deranged armadillo
Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit
I hate you.Chambers2 wrote:I had a bet on Froch to win, a bet on Froch to win by KO and and Froch to win in rounds 10-12Dioufy wrote:On what bet? KO in the 12th?Chambers2 wrote: and me, even more so when I picked up just over £500
It had me jumping round the living like a deranged armadillo
Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit
Cheers, I've chucked enough money back at the bookies thoughDioufy wrote:I hate you.
Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit
gomez v johanesson is the best fight i've seen from doncaster. after that i'd have to give woodhouse v steffy bull major props.stevieb_8006 wrote:BY FAR THE MOST UNDERATED TRILOGY IS DENNIS ANDRIES VS JEFF HARDING!!!! WARS!!!
u just couldnt split them. also, i think Brodie vs Injin Chi 1 was a belter. I think it was just after Gomez vs Arthur and got overlooked.
Actually, Gomez vs Johansson was a little war while it lasted, the shell of Gomez giving absolutely everything.
Woods vs Johnson 3 was a great battle and personal triumph for Clinton.
We could be here all day really..... Joe C Vs Robin Reid.
Eubank vs Thompson, or as an earlier poster put, basically any of Carls fights. So underappreciated that fella.
andries v harding are great fights. i thought they were pretty well rated. certainly the rivalry is rated higher tha the fighters themselves. i prefer the 2nd fight, as andries was in massive trouble, went all-out and accomplished the seemingly impossible: pretty much nailing harding to the canvas.
andries should have got the decision in that 3rd fight, but it was a tremendous fight. oddly, at least to me, it's the first fight that seems to make the "classics" list, i.e. harding, well behind, scores late KO on fatigued andries. obviously the judges were scoring it for andries, but i felt that too was a very close fight.
another "home robbery" i love is billy hardy-orlando canizales 1. hardy fell behind with the knockdown but it was close all the way and i felt he dominated the final third in exciting exchanges. few ppl discuss this as a great fight, but it was really good - especially for showing a brit stepping up in class and showing his absolute best, and then some. canizales, not for the first/last time, got a bit lucky. but he certainly nailed hardy in their sweltering, tough, but less competitive rematch.
Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit
canizales/seabrooks
Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit
if you like two guys knocking lumps and years off each other - PCW/Sosa I/II.
Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit
i believe alan rudkin v johny clarke were spectacular bouts.
-
Dirk Kelly
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4971
- Joined: 06 Jul 2004, 20:13
Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit
Naz vs. Ingle
Jones vs. Ingle
Jones vs. Ingle
Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit
rendall munroe v simone maludrottu was a thrilling fight with many punches thrown.
yet only one person on this forum rated it as the tremendous fight (i think it was stujones) it clearly was.
yet only one person on this forum rated it as the tremendous fight (i think it was stujones) it clearly was.
Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit
Autobarn wrote:rendall munroe v simone maludrottu was a thrilling fight with many punches thrown.
yet only one person on this forum rated it as the tremendous fight (i think it was stujones) it clearly was.
Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit
yep, loads of whining about scoring and arm punching, but little appreciation of a very tough contrast of styles (munroe's swarming, malu's counter punching).
Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit
Wally Swift Jnr v Tony Collins was a great bout; (just remembered it after seeing a thread on Collins). Brilliant bout 
Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit
Billy Corocoran vs Carl Johannsson - for as long as it lasted what a belter. Corcoran through everything but the kitchen sink at Carl in a "suicidal" tactic... He needed that kitchen sink also.
It's gets mentioned for the controvesy... I don't see it - But Hunt vs Meager is one I will not forget in a hurry.
It's gets mentioned for the controvesy... I don't see it - But Hunt vs Meager is one I will not forget in a hurry.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23015
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit
One of the most underated lads on here is Carl.A very hard man.stujones wrote:Billy Corocoran vs Carl Johannsson - for as long as it lasted what a belter. Corcoran through everything but the kitchen sink at Carl in a "suicidal" tactic... He needed that kitchen sink also.
It's gets mentioned for the controvesy... I don't see it - But Hunt vs Meager is one I will not forget in a hurry.