Classic Fights not given enough credit

Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit

Post by Autobarn »

Counter-puncher wrote:
Autobarn wrote:
brian mitchell's first fight - a controversial draw - with tony lopez was a superb boxing match.

no one raves about these fights, despite involving hall of famers in gruelling battles.

.[/b]
i'll have to rewatch it some time, don't recall much of the fight at all, apart from Lopez trying to box with Mitchell and getting quietly outworked
it was really good - great technique, brisk pace, back and forth action. one of my faves. the rematch was won easily by mitchell, though.
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit

Post by Hagler2002 »

Autobarn wrote:
Hagler2002 wrote:Monshipour V's Sithchatchawal
everyone's 2004 fight of the year?
It goes under the radar, a lot of boxing fans I know haven't seen it yet alone heard of it.
orbtastic
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12549
Joined: 05 Dec 2006, 11:22

Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit

Post by orbtastic »

he's never been in a bad fight
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit

Post by Autobarn »

veeraphol sahaprom v hozumi hasegawa 1 - very intense.

and at a much lower level, lovemore n'dou v naoufel ben rabah, a seriously intense light welterweight title fight.

i really like mahyar monshipour v julio zarate. all out warfare. but i think with zarate being pulled out between rounds, it lacked the dramatic ending.

poonsawat v cordoba is absolute class, extremely close and very tough. how many non title fights are this good? a true, worthy world title eliminator. i believe the british ref who worked the fight was very impressed.
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13262
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit

Post by MightyWarrior »

Autobarn wrote:
Hagler2002 wrote:Monshipour V's Sithchatchawal
everyone's 2004 fight of the year?
I thought Valero v Mosquera was even better
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit

Post by Autobarn »

never!
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit

Post by Dioufy »

I enjoyed Froch/Taylor, but only for that ending.

:box:
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit

Post by Chambers2 »

Dioufy wrote:I enjoyed Froch/Taylor, but only for that ending.

:box:
and me, even more so when I picked up just over £500
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit

Post by Dioufy »

Chambers2 wrote:
Dioufy wrote:I enjoyed Froch/Taylor, but only for that ending.

:box:
and me, even more so when I picked up just over £500
On what bet? KO in the 12th?
stevieb_8006
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit

Post by stevieb_8006 »

BY FAR THE MOST UNDERATED TRILOGY IS DENNIS ANDRIES VS JEFF HARDING!!!! WARS!!!

u just couldnt split them. also, i think Brodie vs Injin Chi 1 was a belter. I think it was just after Gomez vs Arthur and got overlooked.

Actually, Gomez vs Johansson was a little war while it lasted, the shell of Gomez giving absolutely everything.

Woods vs Johnson 3 was a great battle and personal triumph for Clinton.

We could be here all day really..... Joe C Vs Robin Reid.

Eubank vs Thompson, or as an earlier poster put, basically any of Carls fights. So underappreciated that fella.
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit

Post by Dioufy »

I really enjoyed Smith/Renda.

:box:
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit

Post by Chambers2 »

Dioufy wrote:
Chambers2 wrote:
Dioufy wrote:I enjoyed Froch/Taylor, but only for that ending.

:box:
and me, even more so when I picked up just over £500
On what bet? KO in the 12th?
I had a bet on Froch to win, a bet on Froch to win by KO and and Froch to win in rounds 10-12

It had me jumping round the living like a deranged armadillo
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit

Post by Dioufy »

Chambers2 wrote:
Dioufy wrote:
Chambers2 wrote: and me, even more so when I picked up just over £500
On what bet? KO in the 12th?
I had a bet on Froch to win, a bet on Froch to win by KO and and Froch to win in rounds 10-12

It had me jumping round the living like a deranged armadillo
I hate you.
Chambers2
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6499
Joined: 24 Feb 2004, 07:24

Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit

Post by Chambers2 »

Dioufy wrote:I hate you.
Cheers, I've chucked enough money back at the bookies though
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit

Post by Autobarn »

stevieb_8006 wrote:BY FAR THE MOST UNDERATED TRILOGY IS DENNIS ANDRIES VS JEFF HARDING!!!! WARS!!!

u just couldnt split them. also, i think Brodie vs Injin Chi 1 was a belter. I think it was just after Gomez vs Arthur and got overlooked.

Actually, Gomez vs Johansson was a little war while it lasted, the shell of Gomez giving absolutely everything.

Woods vs Johnson 3 was a great battle and personal triumph for Clinton.

We could be here all day really..... Joe C Vs Robin Reid.

Eubank vs Thompson, or as an earlier poster put, basically any of Carls fights. So underappreciated that fella.
gomez v johanesson is the best fight i've seen from doncaster. after that i'd have to give woodhouse v steffy bull major props.

andries v harding are great fights. i thought they were pretty well rated. certainly the rivalry is rated higher tha the fighters themselves. i prefer the 2nd fight, as andries was in massive trouble, went all-out and accomplished the seemingly impossible: pretty much nailing harding to the canvas.

andries should have got the decision in that 3rd fight, but it was a tremendous fight. oddly, at least to me, it's the first fight that seems to make the "classics" list, i.e. harding, well behind, scores late KO on fatigued andries. obviously the judges were scoring it for andries, but i felt that too was a very close fight.

another "home robbery" i love is billy hardy-orlando canizales 1. hardy fell behind with the knockdown but it was close all the way and i felt he dominated the final third in exciting exchanges. few ppl discuss this as a great fight, but it was really good - especially for showing a brit stepping up in class and showing his absolute best, and then some. canizales, not for the first/last time, got a bit lucky. but he certainly nailed hardy in their sweltering, tough, but less competitive rematch.
orbtastic
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12549
Joined: 05 Dec 2006, 11:22

Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit

Post by orbtastic »

canizales/seabrooks
orbtastic
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12549
Joined: 05 Dec 2006, 11:22

Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit

Post by orbtastic »

if you like two guys knocking lumps and years off each other - PCW/Sosa I/II.
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit

Post by hurlock »

i believe alan rudkin v johny clarke were spectacular bouts.
Dirk Kelly
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4971
Joined: 06 Jul 2004, 20:13

Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit

Post by Dirk Kelly »

Naz vs. Ingle
Jones vs. Ingle
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit

Post by Autobarn »

rendall munroe v simone maludrottu was a thrilling fight with many punches thrown.

yet only one person on this forum rated it as the tremendous fight (i think it was stujones) it clearly was.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27489
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit

Post by stujones »

Autobarn wrote:rendall munroe v simone maludrottu was a thrilling fight with many punches thrown.

yet only one person on this forum rated it as the tremendous fight (i think it was stujones) it clearly was.
:TU: Yeah, can remember people saying I was talking out of my arse when I hailed it a fantastic little fight.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit

Post by Autobarn »

yep, loads of whining about scoring and arm punching, but little appreciation of a very tough contrast of styles (munroe's swarming, malu's counter punching).
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit

Post by palooka »

Wally Swift Jnr v Tony Collins was a great bout; (just remembered it after seeing a thread on Collins). Brilliant bout :box:
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27489
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit

Post by stujones »

Billy Corocoran vs Carl Johannsson - for as long as it lasted what a belter. Corcoran through everything but the kitchen sink at Carl in a "suicidal" tactic... He needed that kitchen sink also.

It's gets mentioned for the controvesy... I don't see it - But Hunt vs Meager is one I will not forget in a hurry.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23015
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Classic Fights not given enough credit

Post by mickey1975 »

stujones wrote:Billy Corocoran vs Carl Johannsson - for as long as it lasted what a belter. Corcoran through everything but the kitchen sink at Carl in a "suicidal" tactic... He needed that kitchen sink also.

It's gets mentioned for the controvesy... I don't see it - But Hunt vs Meager is one I will not forget in a hurry.
One of the most underated lads on here is Carl.A very hard man.
Post Reply