Ernie Shavers vs

Post Reply
yancey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2827
Joined: 16 Dec 2007, 18:26

Ernie Shavers vs

Post by yancey »

Max Schmeling
Joe Louis
Rocky Marciano
Floyd Patterson
Joe Frazier

Primes, of course.

What happens?
dempseyfire
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5534
Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56

Re: Ernie Shavers vs

Post by dempseyfire »

Loses to all of them but splits fights with Patterson
yancey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2827
Joined: 16 Dec 2007, 18:26

Re: Ernie Shavers vs

Post by yancey »

dempseyfire wrote:Loses to all of them but splits fights with Patterson
Well, you may be right, but I think he springs a surprise or two.

I think Schmeling and Patterson are his two most likely victims.

As a Frazier man, I would be a little nervous for the first two rounds or so before I start relaxing. Ernie's right hand does worry me.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Ernie Shavers vs

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

yancey wrote:
dempseyfire wrote:Loses to all of them but splits fights with Patterson
Well, you may be right, but I think he springs a surprise or two.

I think Schmeling and Patterson are his two most likely victims.

As a Frazier man, I would be a little nervous for the first two rounds or so before I start relaxing. Ernie's right hand does worry me.
DempseyFire is about right, IMO. There's a clue to how good Shavers was in your own statement --- "he springs a surprise or two," & that's exactly what he'd need to do. Shavers wasn't as good as any of the men on your list.
yancey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2827
Joined: 16 Dec 2007, 18:26

Re: Ernie Shavers vs

Post by yancey »

Goodnight, Irene wrote:
yancey wrote:
dempseyfire wrote:Loses to all of them but splits fights with Patterson
Well, you may be right, but I think he springs a surprise or two.

I think Schmeling and Patterson are his two most likely victims.

As a Frazier man, I would be a little nervous for the first two rounds or so before I start relaxing. Ernie's right hand does worry me.
DempseyFire is about right, IMO. There's a clue to how good Shavers was in your own statement --- "he springs a surprise or two," & that's exactly what he'd need to do. Shavers wasn't as good as any of the men on your list.
Never thought that Shavers was as good as any of them.

I'm just saying with that big right hand the surprise possibility exists.

Think Ingemar Johannson-Floyd Patterson, 1959, NY, NY.
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Re: Ernie Shavers vs

Post by BoxBuzz »

Always has the puncher's chance, but I don't see him beating any of them.

Patterson? He just wasn't as precise as Sonny, but if he connected it could happen.

Could be similar to the Floyd Ingemar sessions.
Goodnight, Irene
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43

Re: Ernie Shavers vs

Post by Goodnight, Irene »

yancey wrote:
Goodnight, Irene wrote:
yancey wrote: Well, you may be right, but I think he springs a surprise or two.

I think Schmeling and Patterson are his two most likely victims.

As a Frazier man, I would be a little nervous for the first two rounds or so before I start relaxing. Ernie's right hand does worry me.
DempseyFire is about right, IMO. There's a clue to how good Shavers was in your own statement --- "he springs a surprise or two," & that's exactly what he'd need to do. Shavers wasn't as good as any of the men on your list.
Never thought that Shavers was as good as any of them.

I'm just saying with that big right hand the surprise possibility exists.

Think Ingemar Johannson-Floyd Patterson, 1959, NY, NY.
No one is disagreeing with you, & I'm not accusing you of anything.
Crease
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16865
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 10:19

Re: Ernie Shavers vs

Post by Crease »

Shavers loses to all of them, thought there would be a few slugfests in those fights mentioend above.
Post Reply