Froch Abraham not for title

Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Froch Abraham not for title

Post by Horse »

stujones wrote:Especially as the WBC had promised Dirrell first dibs if anything like this happened, or post super 6.
Why did they promise him anything? The WBC are a very silly organisation.
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5456
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Froch Abraham not for title

Post by forcefraser »

Froch v Abraham will be a top battle. Who really cares if it`s for a belt.
stevek3lly
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 649
Joined: 14 Jul 2010, 14:56

Re: Froch Abraham not for title

Post by stevek3lly »

Bomber 1 wrote:
MacTavish wrote:Which one Bomber?

Froch Vs Abraham everyday of the week mate, It's a dream fight really!! Very entertaining fight!! 5*
Good point Bomber. I think it is going to be one hell of a scrap and I will be looking forward to it.
Post Reply