Alfred Cole

Post Reply
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Alfred Cole

Post by oliverfennell »

I see he's listed as a heavyweight, but I'd suggest cruiser is more appropriate.

I know he fought at heavyweight in the latter part of his career, but his prime was at cruiser and he had a long IBF reign at the weight. Surely this makes cruiser more appropriate for his he is categorised/remembered?

There are, of course, many multi-weight boxers, but once their careers are complete they are usually listed by the weight class in which they had their best years/most definitive career stage.
wouter
Editor
Editor
Posts: 4801
Joined: 04 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Alfred Cole

Post by wouter »

He was still rated at the division he last fought in. Since he hasn't fought for more than 12 months, and therefore technically inactive, he's now back to cruiserweight. :TU:
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: Alfred Cole

Post by oliverfennell »

Similarly, Junior Witter is listed as welterweight. I don't know if he EVER fought there, and certainly not even in his last bout.
claudevsq
Editor
Editor
Posts: 3332
Joined: 19 Jun 2007, 14:35

Re: Alfred Cole

Post by claudevsq »

No, but the average is used when a career is ended for example. Witter fought most of his bouts at welterweight.
wouter
Editor
Editor
Posts: 4801
Joined: 04 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Alfred Cole

Post by wouter »

claudevsq wrote:No, but the average is used when a career is ended for example. Witter fought most of his bouts at welterweight.
Oliver is correct. He's now rated at light welterweight. :TU:
claudevsq
Editor
Editor
Posts: 3332
Joined: 19 Jun 2007, 14:35

Re: Alfred Cole

Post by claudevsq »

:TU:
Post Reply