Perhaps I'm jumping the gun then, and apologise. Its just i read Neil's comment and one from a chap from cardiff and both were essentially negative. I post more regularly on a rugby forum, and get a bit sick of every Celt running down a decent English performance whenever the opportunity arises.Goz wrote:I hadn't noticed any bias whatsoever toward Scottish fighters in Neils posts....Loftgroov wrote:Though I suppose if Khan was Scottish it would have been the best performance you'd ever seen.neil r wrote:Well Khan done him on points 19-13 . he fought well, even against a fighter almost twice his age... far from a classic though, lets watch the press go wild now and blow everything out of proportion...
8)
e.g. if Scotland beat Tonga or Malawi or something its a "great result" and if England beat New Zealand its because they cheated/were lucky/ref was biased [delete as appropriate]
I just wonder if the chips on their shoulders will ever end.
Khan just beat Mario Kindelin for christ sake! Why does the first comment in a post-fight thread have to be negative?
