David haye fixed the fight pure and simple

john welsh
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 143
Joined: 30 Nov 2008, 15:13

Re: David haye fixed the fight pure and simple

Post by john welsh »

hitman_hatton1 wrote:
john welsh wrote:
hitman_hatton1 wrote:the board need to get haye up before em to explain this sh1t.

check his betting accounts now the greedy f*cker. :D
Oh indeed,the board needs to haul him in over those comments,forget the fans its only about the $$$
he shouldn't be as candid as that.

he's making a bloody mockery out of it.

say that sort of thing behind closed doors.

but don't yab away to the interviewer about it. :roll:
Exactly! i bet thousands of people are complaining right now after him saying that.
The_Hayemaker
Cruiserweight
Posts: 24
Joined: 12 Nov 2010, 13:08

Re: David haye fixed the fight pure and simple

Post by The_Hayemaker »

just watched a david haye interview on sky sports news....did i hear him say "i had alot of money on the 3rd round and so did my friends and family"...if that is what i heard are boxers allowed to bet on themself??
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: David haye fixed the fight pure and simple

Post by palooka »

U.F.O wrote:What about Ali when he was saying this stuff 40 odd years ago, It's not like it's anything new

you can do it if you are in a different league to your opponent, happens in all sports
The thing is Ali said it BEFORE the fight; not after. Haye himself has made the non event questionable.
john welsh
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 143
Joined: 30 Nov 2008, 15:13

Re: David haye fixed the fight pure and simple

Post by john welsh »

The_Hayemaker wrote:just watched a david haye interview on sky sports news....did i hear him say "i had alot of money on the 3rd round and so did my friends and family"...if that is what i heard are boxers allowed to bet on themself??
No,no they aren`t.

he`s gotten over excited for the money he betted and blurtted it out by accident...we`v been had.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: David haye fixed the fight pure and simple

Post by palooka »

It is the last £15 that anyone's getting off me for a PPV; believe me.
The_Hayemaker
Cruiserweight
Posts: 24
Joined: 12 Nov 2010, 13:08

Re: David haye fixed the fight pure and simple

Post by The_Hayemaker »

john welsh wrote:
The_Hayemaker wrote:just watched a david haye interview on sky sports news....did i hear him say "i had alot of money on the 3rd round and so did my friends and family"...if that is what i heard are boxers allowed to bet on themself??
No,no they aren`t.

he`s gotten over excited for the money he betted and blurtted it out by accident...we`v been had.
so did he actually say that and im not hearing things? if he said that then it is an absolute disgrace and a middle finger up at all boxing fans.
U.F.O
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 279
Joined: 20 Dec 2008, 19:38

Re: David haye fixed the fight pure and simple

Post by U.F.O »

Even if he did bet on himself, no rules have been broken

the way people are going on you would think he was fighting himself :lol: ,
it was by no means a garenteed winning bet was it.
Darling
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 388
Joined: 01 Apr 2010, 15:39

Re: David haye fixed the fight pure and simple

Post by Darling »

john welsh wrote:
The_Hayemaker wrote:just watched a david haye interview on sky sports news....did i hear him say "i had alot of money on the 3rd round and so did my friends and family"...if that is what i heard are boxers allowed to bet on themself??
No,no they aren`t.

he`s gotten over excited for the money he betted and blurtted it out by accident...we`v been had.
:oo
jonp
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2081
Joined: 29 Mar 2007, 12:44

Re: David haye fixed the fight pure and simple

Post by jonp »

john welsh wrote:
The_Hayemaker wrote:just watched a david haye interview on sky sports news....did i hear him say "i had alot of money on the 3rd round and so did my friends and family"...if that is what i heard are boxers allowed to bet on themself??
No,no they aren`t.

he`s gotten over excited for the money he betted and blurtted it out by accident...we`v been had.
Theres no rules topping a boxer betting on himself it been happining for years from jack dempsey against willard up to lloyd honeyghan against curry jut usualy they arnt confident enough to name the round.
This ha happend more than you think have heard plenty of times of boxers having a nice bonus backing themself
Darling
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 388
Joined: 01 Apr 2010, 15:39

Re: David haye fixed the fight pure and simple

Post by Darling »

jonp wrote:
john welsh wrote:
The_Hayemaker wrote:just watched a david haye interview on sky sports news....did i hear him say "i had alot of money on the 3rd round and so did my friends and family"...if that is what i heard are boxers allowed to bet on themself??
No,no they aren`t.

he`s gotten over excited for the money he betted and blurtted it out by accident...we`v been had.
Theres no rules topping a boxer betting on himself it been happining for years from jack dempsey against willard up to lloyd honeyghan against curry jut usualy they arnt confident enough to name the round.
This ha happend more than you think have heard plenty of times of boxers having a nice bonus backing themself
But john welsh sounded so confident with his "No,no they aren' t."

We need a boxing expert like FLINT ISLAND to confirm this one way or another.
john welsh
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 143
Joined: 30 Nov 2008, 15:13

Re: David haye fixed the fight pure and simple

Post by john welsh »

jonp wrote:
john welsh wrote:
The_Hayemaker wrote:just watched a david haye interview on sky sports news....did i hear him say "i had alot of money on the 3rd round and so did my friends and family"...if that is what i heard are boxers allowed to bet on themself??
No,no they aren`t.

he`s gotten over excited for the money he betted and blurtted it out by accident...we`v been had.
Theres no rules topping a boxer betting on himself it been happining for years from jack dempsey against willard up to lloyd honeyghan against curry jut usualy they arnt confident enough to name the round.
This ha happend more than you think have heard plenty of times of boxers having a nice bonus backing themself
Problem is mate demsey was fighting 100 years ago,this is 2010 this sort of shit should not be happening today,its a disgrace to boxing fans.
U.F.O
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 279
Joined: 20 Dec 2008, 19:38

Re: David haye fixed the fight pure and simple

Post by U.F.O »

Look the only problem with this fight was it was a total mismatch as most people realised.

If it hadn;t have been, well he wouldn't have been able to toy with this opponent would he.
greenyox3
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1197
Joined: 20 Jul 2010, 16:53

Re: David haye fixed the fight pure and simple

Post by greenyox3 »

What he's done is really no different to the likes of Ali/Naz predicting which rounds they would ko their opponents in. The fact that he's bet on it makes no difference IMO.

End of the day, if Audley had actually tried punching this probably wouldn't even be an issue.
Carbo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1827
Joined: 23 Nov 2006, 14:25

Re: David haye fixed the fight pure and simple

Post by Carbo »

What a moron John Welsh is. He pays to watch a knock out artist fight a man three levels (at least) below him, who also has a suspect chin and who has always fought tentative. And then when it's a demolition job he thinks the whole thing's a fix. Incredible!

Promoters have a job to do: sell fights. They sold this by trying to build up the idea that Harrison had a chance and that there was some kind of "needle" between the two. Nobody I know whose opinion on boxing I respect thought that Harrison had a chance.

I didn't.

And he didn't land a single punch.

But you paid your money and you got a very exciting demolition job. People did it for Tyson against similar opposition. Not a rip off. Certainly not a fix.
damianhucker1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3071
Joined: 20 Sep 2008, 17:36

Re: David haye fixed the fight pure and simple

Post by damianhucker1 »

Carbo wrote:What a moron John Welsh is. He pays to watch a knock out artist fight a man three levels (at least) below him, who also has a suspect chin and who has always fought tentative. And then when it's a demolition job he thinks the whole thing's a fix. Incredible!

Promoters have a job to do: sell fights. They sold this by trying to build up the idea that Harrison had a chance and that there was some kind of "needle" between the two. Nobody I know whose opinion on boxing I respect thought that Harrison had a chance.

I didn't.

And he didn't land a single punch.

But you paid your money and you got a very exciting demolition job. People did it for Tyson against similar opposition. Not a rip off. Certainly not a fix.

To be fair it was a bit different with Tyson , i paid for several that ended up as 1st or second round blowouts but dont really remember feeling dissapointed , maybe the overall cards were good , i dont remember , i think in those days you paid to see tyson the animal destroy his opponents .
Carbo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1827
Joined: 23 Nov 2006, 14:25

Re: David haye fixed the fight pure and simple

Post by Carbo »

damianhucker1 wrote:
Carbo wrote:What a moron John Welsh is. He pays to watch a knock out artist fight a man three levels (at least) below him, who also has a suspect chin and who has always fought tentative. And then when it's a demolition job he thinks the whole thing's a fix. Incredible!

Promoters have a job to do: sell fights. They sold this by trying to build up the idea that Harrison had a chance and that there was some kind of "needle" between the two. Nobody I know whose opinion on boxing I respect thought that Harrison had a chance.

I didn't.

And he didn't land a single punch.

But you paid your money and you got a very exciting demolition job. People did it for Tyson against similar opposition. Not a rip off. Certainly not a fix.
To be fair it was a bit different with Tyson , i paid for several that ended up as 1st or second round blowouts but dont really remember feeling dissapointed , maybe the overall cards were good , i dont remember , i think in those days you paid to see tyson the animal destroy his opponents .
But Ruiz is better than Harrison; Barrett is better than Harrison. I think they were put over a combined nine times.

Everyone knew that not only was Harrison several levels below in quality -- that he'd never been in with anyone like as good as Haye, and had lost to far, far worse, and been rocked by far, far lighter punchers -- but that he was a tentative fighter against a man who has rocked and put down men with good chins.

This was known.

I watched, because I wanted to see how Haye did the demolition job, to be honest.

To say it was fixed -- dear God!
orbtastic
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12549
Joined: 05 Dec 2006, 11:22

Re: David haye fixed the fight pure and simple

Post by orbtastic »

Groves, post fight interview, one hour before the Haye fight "Thanks for telling me about the round David" - Adam Smith - "what's this, what round??" Groves "can't tell you that" Booth going white, making cutting gestures...
tobyh5
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2880
Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 07:07

Re: David haye fixed the fight pure and simple

Post by tobyh5 »

Haye talked about him and family betting days ago, think
I read it in The Sun
BillyTKid
Cruiserweight
Posts: 401
Joined: 08 Sep 2010, 13:19

Re: David haye fixed the fight pure and simple

Post by BillyTKid »

The biggest fix was Sky convincing people this was a fair fight. Won £700 on this tonight.......should have bet more.
orbtastic
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12549
Joined: 05 Dec 2006, 11:22

Re: David haye fixed the fight pure and simple

Post by orbtastic »

Yeah, anyone that even talked up Audley is a complete mug.
tobyh5
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2880
Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 07:07

Re: David haye fixed the fight pure and simple

Post by tobyh5 »

In all the years I have followed boxing I have only ever known one other example of a big fight having a victor that there was no doubt about - hatton v pbf

But just like that one, people bought into lies and false promoting. Hatton would not have won that fight if he had a shotgun, ditto Harrison.
U.F.O
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 279
Joined: 20 Dec 2008, 19:38

Re: David haye fixed the fight pure and simple

Post by U.F.O »

There have never been any problems with any sports person betting on himself to win with a bookies.
They are happy to take bets like this, why wouldn't they be ???.
There are a million and one things that could have stopped Haye Collecting tonight, it's still gambling .

betting on yourself to lose in sport is the big problem.
alot of sports governing bodies have banned gambling altogether as a result.

but boxing is not one of them and
Haye's done nothing wrong, other than taking an easy fight.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: David haye fixed the fight pure and simple

Post by leforge »

Audley had bet on 3 round too! Haye full of bs
when will he fight next?
JDC
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2963
Joined: 23 Jan 2008, 21:24

Re: David haye fixed the fight pure and simple

Post by JDC »

The predicted lack of A-Force did win me a few bears tonight. Audley did manage to win 1 round despite only throwing 1 punch.

He tried to cover up and use his defense, but it was never guna happen
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

Re: David haye fixed the fight pure and simple

Post by hurlock »

Audley A- jab :lol:
Post Reply