Quality of Kell Brook opponents compared to Matthew Hattpn
Quality of Kell Brook opponents compared to Matthew Hattpn
Matthew Hatton has fought better opponents recently than Brook. Brook needs to fight better opponents otherwise he going to come unstuck when he steps up.
Kell Brook opponents boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=272717&cat=boxer
Matthew Hattons opponents http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer
Kell Brook opponents boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=272717&cat=boxer
Matthew Hattons opponents http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer
Re: Quality of Kell Brook opponents compared to Matthew Hattpn
Don't think you can say they are wildley better. N'dou was Hatton's only goodish opponent and Jenning's was Brooks' only goodish opponent. Hatton's last opponent was really below British title standard so id say they were about equal tbh
-
littlekinny
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 255
- Joined: 19 Oct 2009, 07:36
Re: Quality of Kell Brook opponents compared to Matthew Hattpn
Tbh I honestly think Jennings would beat Hatton
Re: Quality of Kell Brook opponents compared to Matthew Hattpn
He'd struggle to beat me if he fought the way he ''fought'' against Brook.
I like Michael a lot but that was pathetic.
I like Michael a lot but that was pathetic.
Re: Quality of Kell Brook opponents compared to Matthew Hattpn
The ukrainan hatton beat is better than anyone brook faced. Also branco is onnpar with Jennings!Camcas wrote:Don't think you can say they are wildley better. N'dou was Hatton's only goodish opponent and Jenning's was Brooks' only goodish opponent. Hatton's last opponent was really below British title standard so id say they were about equal tbh
-
xXHAMMERXx
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 159
- Joined: 09 Jan 2009, 16:33
Re: Quality of Kell Brook opponents compared to Matthew Hattpn
Hatton is a lucky guy an all the lads he has boxed are old men as for brook he hasn't been tested my brother Craig Watson beat the shit out of Hatton an has been in the ring with alot of good fighters i.e o donnell, witch he should have won, hatton , numembembe , lomax , barrie jones an stopped him in 4 alot quicker than brook . An also won the commonwelth title at light middle on 2 day notice in 2 rounds but gets no recognition after he has beat odonnel I would love to see him fight Hatton again or brook I no he would want it .
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Quality of Kell Brook opponents compared to Matthew Hattpn
Watson is very unlucky. lets face it, after schooling Hatton, had he been promoted with the same lets call it zeal that other fighters have, imagine what Watson could do with the kind of opportunities Matt hatton or Brook have had.
Re: Quality of Kell Brook opponents compared to Matthew Hattpn
Hatton's have been superior in the past couple of years.
All of Brook's opponents bar Jennings have had shaky chins and can't punch..... and Jennings was just crap on the night I'm afraid.
All of Brook's opponents bar Jennings have had shaky chins and can't punch..... and Jennings was just crap on the night I'm afraid.
Re: Quality of Kell Brook opponents compared to Matthew Hattpn
Hatton next EBU mandtory : http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer
Hatton v Witter would be good. I think Watson beats O'Donnell then he should be challenging for EBU.
Hatton v Witter would be good. I think Watson beats O'Donnell then he should be challenging for EBU.
Re: Quality of Kell Brook opponents compared to Matthew Hattpn
Do you really rate Matthew Hatton? I don't think Brook's as good as everybody says but he's clearly better than Ricky's talentless brother. You missed a blinding test by the way Dave.leforge wrote:Hatton next EBU mandtory : http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer
Hatton v Witter would be good. I think Watson beats O'Donnell then he should be challenging for EBU.
Re: Quality of Kell Brook opponents compared to Matthew Hattpn
No I think he an improving fighter. I just trying to say he had better opposition than Brook. Brook still untested imo.yid14 wrote:Do you really rate Matthew Hatton? I don't think Brook's as good as everybody says but he's clearly better than Ricky's talentless brother. You missed a blinding test by the way Dave.leforge wrote:Hatton next EBU mandtory : http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer
Hatton v Witter would be good. I think Watson beats O'Donnell then he should be challenging for EBU.
I am gutted I missed it. I thought we were going to lose!
Re: Quality of Kell Brook opponents compared to Matthew Hattpn
I think Brook knocks Hatton out at anytime of there career and I'll give you whatever odds you want. Did you go to the last prizefighter? And are you going to the Liverpool 11th dec bill mate?leforge wrote:No I think he an improving fighter. I just trying to say he had better opposition than Brook. Brook still untested imo.yid14 wrote:Do you really rate Matthew Hatton? I don't think Brook's as good as everybody says but he's clearly better than Ricky's talentless brother. You missed a blinding test by the way Dave.leforge wrote:Hatton next EBU mandtory : http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer
Hatton v Witter would be good. I think Watson beats O'Donnell then he should be challenging for EBU.
I am gutted I missed it. I thought we were going to lose!
-
Pugilist-specialist
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1632
- Joined: 11 Jul 2008, 04:37
Re: Quality of Kell Brook opponents compared to Matthew Hattpn
Hatton hasn't boxed Jennings and lost to Watson - he's probably ranked 3rd in Manchester.
Brook has beaten everyone who has been put in front of him.

Brook has beaten everyone who has been put in front of him.
-
bigjack
- Heavyweight

Re: Quality of Kell Brook opponents compared to Matthew Hattpn
littlekinny wrote:Tbh I honestly think Jennings would beat Hatton
Yes without a doubt
Re: Quality of Kell Brook opponents compared to Matthew Hattpn
No watched on tv. Having people round to watch Dec 11th Bill. If it was London would go. Are you back in New Zealand now?yid14 wrote:I think Brook knocks Hatton out at anytime of there career and I'll give you whatever odds you want. Did you go to the last prizefighter? And are you going to the Liverpool 11th dec bill mate?leforge wrote:No I think he an improving fighter. I just trying to say he had better opposition than Brook. Brook still untested imo.yid14 wrote:Do you really rate Matthew Hatton? I don't think Brook's as good as everybody says but he's clearly better than Ricky's talentless brother. You missed a blinding test by the way Dave.
I am gutted I missed it. I thought we were going to lose!
I like to see Brook v Hatton.
Re: Quality of Kell Brook opponents compared to Matthew Hattpn
Sure there are plenty of question marks,
But I think Matt has improved a lot in the last couple of years since he left Billy Graham.
Seems more resilient and better all round. Others may be more natural, but especially in the case of jennings - inactivity has been his main downfall as he is always in shape.
Watson and O'Donnell are the 2 top dogs domestically for skills.
But I think Matt has improved a lot in the last couple of years since he left Billy Graham.
Seems more resilient and better all round. Others may be more natural, but especially in the case of jennings - inactivity has been his main downfall as he is always in shape.
Watson and O'Donnell are the 2 top dogs domestically for skills.
-
Captain Hook
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4730
- Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40
Re: Quality of Kell Brook opponents compared to Matthew Hattpn
I agree, he's a far better boxer in my opinion and was doing ok v Brook before the stoppage.littlekinny wrote:Tbh I honestly think Jennings would beat Hatton
Re: Quality of Kell Brook opponents compared to Matthew Hattpn
Yeah I'm back in N.Z - I would love to see Brook-Hatton, It will never happen though.leforge wrote:No watched on tv. Having people round to watch Dec 11th Bill. If it was London would go. Are you back in New Zealand now?yid14 wrote:I think Brook knocks Hatton out at anytime of there career and I'll give you whatever odds you want. Did you go to the last prizefighter? And are you going to the Liverpool 11th dec bill mate?leforge wrote: No I think he an improving fighter. I just trying to say he had better opposition than Brook. Brook still untested imo.
I am gutted I missed it. I thought we were going to lose!
I like to see Brook v Hatton.
-
Captain Hook
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4730
- Joined: 07 May 2007, 09:40
Re: Quality of Kell Brook opponents compared to Matthew Hattpn
In what way? Brook hardly covered himself in glory...LeedsLad wrote:Hatton's have been superior in the past couple of years.
All of Brook's opponents bar Jennings have had shaky chins and can't punch..... and Jennings was just crap on the night I'm afraid.
Re: Quality of Kell Brook opponents compared to Matthew Hattpn
Did you get hammered every day?yid14 wrote:Yeah I'm back in N.Z - I would love to see Brook-Hatton, It will never happen though.leforge wrote:No watched on tv. Having people round to watch Dec 11th Bill. If it was London would go. Are you back in New Zealand now?yid14 wrote: I think Brook knocks Hatton out at anytime of there career and I'll give you whatever odds you want. Did you go to the last prizefighter? And are you going to the Liverpool 11th dec bill mate?
I like to see Brook v Hatton.
Re: Quality of Kell Brook opponents compared to Matthew Hattpn
hatton aint nowhere near world level theres about 5-6 welter weights in britain that would spank him
-
big lennox
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2550
- Joined: 06 Feb 2004, 13:44
Re: Quality of Kell Brook opponents compared to Matthew Hattpn
Mathew Hatton seems like a good bloke, and he has improved enormously, which is good to see, but I think Kell would do a number on him, and finish matters comfortably inside 5 rounds.