Chris Norrad is my brother!Ric wrote:It looks a bit odd to me, when reviewing the Canadian cruiserweight rankings, that a guy like Chris Norrad (5-0-0) is rated below two guys with with 1-0 records (Ryan Ford and Taylor Bull)--even after clicking those two boxers' opponents' records. Something doesn't quite seem right about that.
What do you mean with - to view the database at a certain point in time, please?MatthewS wrote:how much work would it be to provide the user with an option to view the database at a certain point in time?
if I wanted to know what the database - had it existed at that point in time - looked at on say 1st Jan 1955... as opposed to the All-Time ratings. I guess this would mean 'running' the bout calculation from year dot and then stopping it once all bouts prior to that date had occured...computerrank wrote:What do you mean with - to view the database at a certain point in time, please?MatthewS wrote:how much work would it be to provide the user with an option to view the database at a certain point in time?
Can someone please respond. It's not a dig. I just want to know.keithmoonhangover wrote:Can someone please explain why Jimmy Bivins is #4 in the All Time Heavyweight Ratings? This is just plain wrong.
http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxerkeithmoonhangover wrote:Can someone please respond. It's not a dig. I just want to know.keithmoonhangover wrote:Can someone please explain why Jimmy Bivins is #4 in the All Time Heavyweight Ratings? This is just plain wrong.
computerrank wrote:http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxerkeithmoonhangover wrote:Can someone please respond. It's not a dig. I just want to know.keithmoonhangover wrote:Can someone please explain why Jimmy Bivins is #4 in the All Time Heavyweight Ratings? This is just plain wrong.
He reached his career high in light heavyweight 1943
keithmoonhangover wrote:computerrank wrote:http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxerkeithmoonhangover wrote: Can someone please respond. It's not a dig. I just want to know.
He reached his career high in light heavyweight 1943
I have read his record. There is nothing in that record that qualifies him to be rated #4 Heavy.
- ratings on Jan 1 for every year -> would mean to store 2 additional values (division and points) for every boxer and every year - this would be millions of additional values to be updated and stored every day -> overloadMatthewS wrote:if I wanted to know what the database - had it existed at that point in time - looked at on say 1st Jan 1955... as opposed to the All-Time ratings. I guess this would mean 'running' the bout calculation from year dot and then stopping it once all bouts prior to that date had occured...computerrank wrote:What do you mean with - to view the database at a certain point in time, please?MatthewS wrote:how much work would it be to provide the user with an option to view the database at a certain point in time?
also, any chance of being able to produce a boxers points progression through his career as one line graph?
What's the problem?computerrank wrote:- one line graph for rating points -> problem: division moves within career
The problem is, that the points decrease / increase technically in case of weight division step-up / step-down.Asterix wrote:What's the problem?computerrank wrote:- one line graph for rating points -> problem: division moves within career
Here's Amir Khan's:
Points on the left, fight number along the bottom.
But it'll only be after they've had a fight that division, right?computerrank wrote:The problem is, that the points decrease / increase technically in case of weight division step-up / step-down.Asterix wrote:What's the problem?computerrank wrote:- one line graph for rating points -> problem: division moves within career
Here's Amir Khan's:
Points on the left, fight number along the bottom.
... right ...Asterix wrote:But it'll only be after they've had a fight that division, right?computerrank wrote:The problem is, that the points decrease / increase technically in case of weight division step-up / step-down.Asterix wrote: What's the problem?
Here's Amir Khan's:
Points on the left, fight number along the bottom.
Who is your fighter, please?BoxingTrainer wrote:I HAVE A GENERAL QUESTION MY FIGHTER IS ACTIVE AND HAS HAD FOUR PRO FIGHTS. Record 1-3-1ko but is listed as not rated how come?
MatthewS wrote:what did the HW ratings look like the day after RJJ beat Ruiz?
Code: Select all
+------------+------------+-------------+----------+------+
| first_name | last_name | division | boxer_id | r |
+------------+------------+-------------+----------+------+
| Lennox | Lewis | Heavyweight | 1853 | 1045 |
| Roy | Jones Jr | Heavyweight | 1758 | 727 |
| Chris | Byrd | Heavyweight | 4923 | 625 |
| Wladimir | Klitschko | Heavyweight | 7035 | 624 |
| David | Tua | Heavyweight | 4343 | 533 |
| Mike | Tyson | Heavyweight | 474 | 427 |
| Hasim | Rahman | Heavyweight | 6070 | 420 |
| Vitali | Klitschko | Heavyweight | 7033 | 387 |
| Kirk | Johnson | Heavyweight | 7777 | 366 |
| Fres | Oquendo | Heavyweight | 14027 | 361 |
| Evander | Holyfield | Heavyweight | 499 | 357 |
| Sinan | Samil Sam | Heavyweight | 9091 | 352 |
| John | Ruiz | Heavyweight | 4655 | 332 |
| DaVarryl | Williamson | Heavyweight | 15784 | 330 |
| Jameel | McCline | Heavyweight | 8943 | 306 |
+------------+------------+-------------+----------+------+
You have to run through all the bouts - just as the daily rating program does.MatthewS wrote:tyvm
now why is it so hard to allow the user to do that themselves?
fair enough. thanks for doing it at our beck and call tho.computerrank wrote:You have to run through all the bouts - just as the daily rating program does.MatthewS wrote:tyvm
now why is it so hard to allow the user to do that themselves?
It needs minutes and binds a lot of computing ressources.
So such requests are not acceptable for a click call by every user - sorry.