SUPER FIGHTS FROM FEATHERWEIGHT-HEAVYWEIGHT

Post Reply
BrocktonBlockbuster49
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32

SUPER FIGHTS FROM FEATHERWEIGHT-HEAVYWEIGHT

Post by BrocktonBlockbuster49 »

Who wins????


FEATHERWEIGHT: - Sandy Saddler vs Salvador Sanchez ???
My prediction: Saddler by KO 12


LIGHTWEIGHTS/LIGHT WELTER: - Roberto Duran vs Kosta Tzyu
My prediction:: Duran cleans up anyone in this devison wins by TKO 10

WELTERWEIGHT:
Sugar Ray Robinson vs Sugar ray Leonard??
My prediction: heres a super fight robinson 15 U

MIDDLEWEIGHT: Marvin Hagler vs Carlos Monzon ????
MY prediction: another great debate I say Hagler 15 split Des

LIGHT HEAVYWEIGHT:
Roy Jones vs Ezzard Charles
MY prediction: Heres a good one, I say Charles 15 Split Des

Cruiserweights doenst count, Marciano would have fought heavyweight if he were fighting today cause hes strong enough and would Knock out all these bums

HEAVYWEIGHT: Joe Louis vs Muhammad Ali
My prediction: heres the ultimate super fight Louis wins by KO 13
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11172
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Post by Ezzard »

How about

Sanchez v Arguello

Sanchez W15

Duran v Whittaker

Duran WTKO 15

Hearns v Napoles

Hearns W15

Greb v Hagler

Greb W15

Spinks v Jones

Spinks KO13
tiredoldngrey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 442
Joined: 23 May 2005, 12:36

Post by tiredoldngrey »

I see it like this: Saddler beats both Sanchez and Arguello. Too strong, too fierce, underrated skills. Duran beats Kostya and Whitaker. Think 6-8 for the Russian, and 5-9 for Whitaker. Duran would walk through all that cute crap and Pernell had zero to give back. At 147 Robinson easily beats Leonard probably by KO @the 8th, though Leonard's pride may have kept him up thru 10. Napole eats Hearns. Too much skill; like a novice vs. a pro. Tommy never met a punch he could take, and Napoles was more skilled than and hit harder than Leonard. KO in4. I'll go with Greb over Hagler. The Monzon fight has always intrigued me. Sometimes I think Monzon would hypnotize Hagler into thinking to much and outpoint him, then I think Monzon didn't train a heap and Marvin would outwork him and win. Spinks beats Jones at 175 within a round after landing his first clean right hand. RJJ has no business in the ring with the guy I consider the all-time #1 (ranked top 10 at MW, Top 5 at LHW, 8title defenses at HW) Charles was fast, strong, technically rock solid, fight inside or outside.
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11172
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Post by Ezzard »

tiredoldngrey wrote:I see it like this: Saddler beats both Sanchez and Arguello. Too strong, too fierce, underrated skills. Duran beats Kostya and Whitaker. Think 6-8 for the Russian, and 5-9 for Whitaker. Duran would walk through all that cute crap and Pernell had zero to give back. At 147 Robinson easily beats Leonard probably by KO @the 8th, though Leonard's pride may have kept him up thru 10. Napole eats Hearns. Too much skill; like a novice vs. a pro. Tommy never met a punch he could take, and Napoles was more skilled than and hit harder than Leonard. KO in4. I'll go with Greb over Hagler. The Monzon fight has always intrigued me. Sometimes I think Monzon would hypnotize Hagler into thinking to much and outpoint him, then I think Monzon didn't train a heap and Marvin would outwork him and win. Spinks beats Jones at 175 within a round after landing his first clean right hand. RJJ has no business in the ring with the guy I consider the all-time #1 (ranked top 10 at MW, Top 5 at LHW, 8title defenses at HW) Charles was fast, strong, technically rock solid, fight inside or outside.
Hi Tired

I like your thoughts on Monzon-Hagler I feel the same uncertainty, though surely Monzon must have trained hard as he was in some real wars and never seemed short of stamina.

Not sure about Hearns-Napoles. Napoles can win the fight, no doubt, and yes Hearns was chinny, but he always gave a good fight. I watch the first SRL fight and Tommy dominated most of the fight. I think they stopped it too early.
tiredoldngrey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 442
Joined: 23 May 2005, 12:36

Post by tiredoldngrey »

True, and Napoles had a tendency to cut up around the eyes. Michael Spinks beats the tar out of RJJ; too smart hits too hard..
dnahar32
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 348
Joined: 11 Aug 2004, 15:10

Post by dnahar32 »

I think Monzon would outpoint Hagler in a decision fight. While Monzon's training can fairly be questioned, he did get up for the biggest fights (Napoles, Benvenuti, Valdez). He has too much pride to take a fighter like Hagler lightly if they were to fight. Hagler's problem is that as a counterpuncher, he doesn't lead much. With Monzon sticking out his jab, probably the best in the history of the division, it would keep Hagler on the outside. If Hagler bulled his way in, Monzon could tie him up inside and smother him with his length. I like Monzon in the fight although Hagler would give anyone a tough fight at middleweight.
BrocktonBlockbuster49
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4900
Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32

Post by BrocktonBlockbuster49 »

Roy Jones would outpoint mike spinks. roy jones is way too talented an has way to much speed for spinks. Roy Jones is the better boxer.
Post Reply