From Holmes to Now!!!!!!!!
Re: From Holmes to Now!!!!!!!!
1. Holmes
2. Holyfield
3. Lewis
4. Tyson
5. Klitschko V
6. Bowe
7. Klitschko W
8. Witherspoon
9. Thomas
10. (undecided)
2. Holyfield
3. Lewis
4. Tyson
5. Klitschko V
6. Bowe
7. Klitschko W
8. Witherspoon
9. Thomas
10. (undecided)
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: From Holmes to Now!!!!!!!!
Vitali over Bowe? How?
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16872
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: From Holmes to Now!!!!!!!!
Because Bowe was a bum, perhaps?SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Vitali over Bowe? How?
-
The Great John L
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4351
- Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37
Re: From Holmes to Now!!!!!!!!
Holmes
Lewis
Tyson
Holyfield
Bowe
Klitschko, V.
Klitschko, W.
Tucker
Douglas
Tubbs
Witherspoon
Dokes
Bruno
Thomas, P.
Weaver
Spinks, M.
Moorer
Page
Byrd
Berbick
Tua
Smith, BC
Cooney
Coetzee
Ruddock
Lewis
Tyson
Holyfield
Bowe
Klitschko, V.
Klitschko, W.
Tucker
Douglas
Tubbs
Witherspoon
Dokes
Bruno
Thomas, P.
Weaver
Spinks, M.
Moorer
Page
Byrd
Berbick
Tua
Smith, BC
Cooney
Coetzee
Ruddock
Re: From Holmes to Now!!!!!!!!
1. Holmes
2. Lewis
3. Holyfield
4. Tyson
5. Wladimir Klitschko
6. Vitali Klitschko
7. Bowe
it gets a lot harder after that
2. Lewis
3. Holyfield
4. Tyson
5. Wladimir Klitschko
6. Vitali Klitschko
7. Bowe
it gets a lot harder after that
Re: From Holmes to Now!!!!!!!!
Holmes
Lewis
Holyfield
Tyson
Bowe
Klitschko, V.
Klitschko, W.
Dougles (when in shape)
Tucker
Witherspoon
Lewis
Holyfield
Tyson
Bowe
Klitschko, V.
Klitschko, W.
Dougles (when in shape)
Tucker
Witherspoon
Re: From Holmes to Now!!!!!!!!
1.Holmes
2.Holyfield
3.Lewis
4.Tyson
5.Klitschko, V.
6.Klitschko, W.
7.Bowe
8.Douglas
9.Thomas, P.
10.Witherspoon
2.Holyfield
3.Lewis
4.Tyson
5.Klitschko, V.
6.Klitschko, W.
7.Bowe
8.Douglas
9.Thomas, P.
10.Witherspoon
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: From Holmes to Now!!!!!!!!
Agreed, I'd also have Tubbs in the bottom 3 of that list. Mercer should be on it, Rahman was better than Tua. All in all it's pretty solid imo.BarryWashington wrote:I think you're underrated Coetzee (assuming that list is in order).The Great John L wrote:Holmes
Lewis
Tyson
Holyfield
Bowe
Klitschko, V.
Klitschko, W.
Tucker
Douglas
Tubbs
Witherspoon
Dokes
Bruno
Thomas, P.
Weaver
Spinks, M.
Moorer
Page
Byrd
Berbick
Tua
Smith, BC
Cooney
Coetzee
Ruddock
Coetzee deserved the decision over Snipes (even if it wasn't a 10 point must system, Coetzee probably won 6-3-1 or 7-3).
Coetzee deserved the decision over Thomas (a draw was reasonable).
Coetzee gave prime Tate a tough fight.
Coetzee gave prime Weaver a tough fight before the TKO.
Coetzee KO'd a prime Dokes.
I'll make my list later.
For me
Holmes
Holyfield
Lewis
Tyson
Bowe
Witherspoon
Moorer
Wlad
Vitali
Spinks
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16872
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: From Holmes to Now!!!!!!!!
Holmes
Tyson
Holyfield
Lewis
V Klitschko
Spinks
W Klitschko
Bowe
Witherspoon
Douglas
Tyson
Holyfield
Lewis
V Klitschko
Spinks
W Klitschko
Bowe
Witherspoon
Douglas
Re: From Holmes to Now!!!!!!!!
Not much in it.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Vitali over Bowe? How?
Bowe is more fluid and has more to his game. Vitali is much more reliable. Both men were giants but Vitali fought more intelligently.
I just picked Vitali's consistency.
Re: From Holmes to Now!!!!!!!!
Mike Spinks woul have been detonated by Frank Bruno, Mike Weaver, Bonecrusher, Tommy Morrison...
I'm surprised at how many lists he's making.
Holmes-Holy is very close. Lewis is really not far behind. I'm surprised at how few of us disagree on the top rankings.
I'm surprised at how many lists he's making.
Holmes-Holy is very close. Lewis is really not far behind. I'm surprised at how few of us disagree on the top rankings.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16872
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: From Holmes to Now!!!!!!!!
Got to disagree with you on Spinks. If he beat Larry Holmes twice, then he would school the four on your list.Ezzard wrote:Mike Spinks woul have been detonated by Frank Bruno, Mike Weaver, Bonecrusher, Tommy Morrison...
I'm surprised at how many lists he's making.
Holmes-Holy is very close. Lewis is really not far behind. I'm surprised at how few of us disagree on the top rankings.
Agree with you on Klitschko and Bowe. Apart from Holyfield, who did Bowe beat, A has been (Dokes) and a never was (Ferguson).
Re: From Holmes to Now!!!!!!!!
He scraped by an aged Holmes (many thought he lost the rematch) and then avoided any real contenders until he could tap out against Tyson with a huge pay day.keithmoonhangover wrote:Got to disagree with you on Spinks. If he beat Larry Holmes twice, then he would school the four on your list.Ezzard wrote:Mike Spinks woul have been detonated by Frank Bruno, Mike Weaver, Bonecrusher, Tommy Morrison...
I'm surprised at how many lists he's making.
Holmes-Holy is very close. Lewis is really not far behind. I'm surprised at how few of us disagree on the top rankings.
Agree with you on Klitschko and Bowe. Apart from Holyfield, who did Bowe beat, A has been (Dokes) and a never was (Ferguson).
I am a huge Mike fan. I totally wanted him to win his fights but he could not hold a HW shot and he knew it. Holmes had him going but was too old to follow it up.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16872
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: From Holmes to Now!!!!!!!!
I agree with everything yuou said. Holmes is my idol and I was gutted by the results against Spinks. But if Witherspoon beats Bruno, Spinks does too.Ezzard wrote:He scraped by an aged Holmes (many thought he lost the rematch) and then avoided any real contenders until he could tap out against Tyson with a huge pay day.keithmoonhangover wrote:Got to disagree with you on Spinks. If he beat Larry Holmes twice, then he would school the four on your list.Ezzard wrote:Mike Spinks woul have been detonated by Frank Bruno, Mike Weaver, Bonecrusher, Tommy Morrison...
I'm surprised at how many lists he's making.
Holmes-Holy is very close. Lewis is really not far behind. I'm surprised at how few of us disagree on the top rankings.
Agree with you on Klitschko and Bowe. Apart from Holyfield, who did Bowe beat, A has been (Dokes) and a never was (Ferguson).
I am a huge Mike fan. I totally wanted him to win his fights but he could not hold a HW shot and he knew it. Holmes had him going but was too old to follow it up.
-
The Great John L
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4351
- Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37
Re: From Holmes to Now!!!!!!!!
He also can stop punches with something other than his face.Ezzard wrote:Not much in it.
Bowe is more fluid and has more to his game. Vitali is much more reliable. Both men were giants but Vitali fought more intelligently.
I just picked Vitali's consistency.
Re: From Holmes to Now!!!!!!!!
Vitali will always try to fight to his strengths. Bowe will look to turn his advantages into disadvantages.The Great John L wrote:He also can stop punches with something other than his face.Ezzard wrote:Not much in it.
Bowe is more fluid and has more to his game. Vitali is much more reliable. Both men were giants but Vitali fought more intelligently.
I just picked Vitali's consistency.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: From Holmes to Now!!!!!!!!
Ezzard wrote:Not much in it.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Vitali over Bowe? How?
Bowe is more fluid and has more to his game. Vitali is much more reliable. Both men were giants but Vitali fought more intelligently.
I just picked Vitali's consistency.
The consistency of weak opposition?
I don't get Vitali being more reliable at all. How can you say he is much more reliable? Bowe would never quit in a fight, that much I can guarantee. In all honesty, I can't agree with any of this. He was consistently in better shape, that's the only edge I can see. Have to give Bowe talent, resume, toughness & versatility.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: From Holmes to Now!!!!!!!!
The Great John L wrote:He also can stop punches with something other than his face.Ezzard wrote:Not much in it.
Bowe is more fluid and has more to his game. Vitali is much more reliable. Both men were giants but Vitali fought more intelligently.
I just picked Vitali's consistency.

Not against a real opponent.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16872
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: From Holmes to Now!!!!!!!!
Jesse Ferguson and Michael Dokes were REAL opponents? Bowe's title reign was a joke.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:The Great John L wrote:He also can stop punches with something other than his face.Ezzard wrote:Not much in it.
Bowe is more fluid and has more to his game. Vitali is much more reliable. Both men were giants but Vitali fought more intelligently.
I just picked Vitali's consistency.
Not against a real opponent.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16872
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: From Holmes to Now!!!!!!!!
keithmoonhangover wrote:Jesse Ferguson and Michael Dokes were REAL opponents? Bowe's title reign was a joke.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:The Great John L wrote: He also can stop punches with something other than his face.
Not against a real opponent.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: From Holmes to Now!!!!!!!!
You confuse so easily, do you seriously think that response has a thing to do with what you quoted? You can't be that slow.
The proper retort would be that at least Vitali had the stones to fight Lewis. But to pretend he is some great defender because he beat a slew of punching bags is just plain silly.
Bowe beat Holyfield twice, Vitali has nothing near that. End of story.
The proper retort would be that at least Vitali had the stones to fight Lewis. But to pretend he is some great defender because he beat a slew of punching bags is just plain silly.
Bowe beat Holyfield twice, Vitali has nothing near that. End of story.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16872
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: From Holmes to Now!!!!!!!!
Vitali didn't have the opportunity to fight Holyfield. He did, as you mentioned have the nuts to fight Lewis.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:You confuse so easily, do you seriously think that response has a thing to do with what you quoted? You can't be that slow.
The proper retort would be that at least Vitali had the stones to fight Lewis. But to pretend he is some great defender because he beat a slew of punching bags is just plain silly.
Bowe beat Holyfield twice, Vitali has nothing near that. End of story.
Vitali hasn't ducked anyone. Bowe proved he was a gutless coward when he refused to fight Lewis. All the while claiming that he was the man. Pathetic.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: From Holmes to Now!!!!!!!!
Vitali retired instead of fighting Rahman and still hasn't fought him. You can play the hyperbole game with any fighter.keithmoonhangover wrote:Vitali didn't have the opportunity to fight Holyfield. He did, as you mentioned have the nuts to fight Lewis.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:You confuse so easily, do you seriously think that response has a thing to do with what you quoted? You can't be that slow.
The proper retort would be that at least Vitali had the stones to fight Lewis. But to pretend he is some great defender because he beat a slew of punching bags is just plain silly.
Bowe beat Holyfield twice, Vitali has nothing near that. End of story.
Vitali hasn't ducked anyone. Bowe proved he was a gutless coward when he refused to fight Lewis. All the while claiming that he was the man. Pathetic.
Calling Bowe gutless is quite pathetic, he was one of the ballsier fighters of his time. But I don't expect any objectivity from you, that's why I rarely read a word you write.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16872
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: From Holmes to Now!!!!!!!!
Just answer me this Saad with a yes or no answer. Did Bowe avoid Lewis?SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Vitali retired instead of fighting Rahman and still hasn't fought him. You can play the hyperbole game with any fighter.keithmoonhangover wrote:Vitali didn't have the opportunity to fight Holyfield. He did, as you mentioned have the nuts to fight Lewis.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:You confuse so easily, do you seriously think that response has a thing to do with what you quoted? You can't be that slow.
The proper retort would be that at least Vitali had the stones to fight Lewis. But to pretend he is some great defender because he beat a slew of punching bags is just plain silly.
Bowe beat Holyfield twice, Vitali has nothing near that. End of story.
Vitali hasn't ducked anyone. Bowe proved he was a gutless coward when he refused to fight Lewis. All the while claiming that he was the man. Pathetic.
Calling Bowe gutless is quite pathetic, he was one of the ballsier fighters of his time. But I don't expect any objectivity from you, that's why I rarely read a word you write.