Sadly, Adam, and this is NOT something I am endorsing at all (ie: "don't shoot the messenger"), that is EXACTLY the case.Adam1991 wrote:i stand corrected.. soo does this mean that IF mccloskey beats khan he is then super champion?
Col
Sadly, Adam, and this is NOT something I am endorsing at all (ie: "don't shoot the messenger"), that is EXACTLY the case.Adam1991 wrote:i stand corrected.. soo does this mean that IF mccloskey beats khan he is then super champion?
I wouldn't be so sure. No way do I see Morales winning it, but he's had an OK comeback run and still has enough residual skill for it not to be a rout.terminator wrote:Morales is going to get killed by Maidana!
Yes, that's how I remember it, and that was fair enough. As you say, they got a commemorative belt which was more valuable, but it didn't make a vacancy for any other titles beneath it.T.M.K wrote:But the WBA call it Light-Welter, not Super-Lightweight (which is a WBC thing). However Felix Sturm is the WBA Super-world Super-Middleweight champion..... and I am NOT joking here.Adam1991 wrote:he's not super champion at all is he? i thought it was just what the americans called the division amir boxes in, we call it light-welterweight and they call its super-lightweight.. well thats just what i thought anyway if im wrong please correct me!!
That was different. Back in the 80's and 90's the WBA and WBO recognised anyone who made ten defences of their title as a Super-champion, but it was really only via giving them a commemorative belt. I remember chatting to Brian Mitchell once and he told me he was so proud of his 3 world title belts.... straight away, being an anorak I questioned the 3 and he told me the WBA gave him a special super-champions belt when he got to his 10th defence.hurlock wrote:wasnt naz the first wbo super champ.
However, they were never billed as-such and they didn't have a regular champ beneath them or any of this stuff.
"T.M.K"
I must seem like some weird WBA-rules-anorak here..... I'm not (I promise), but:oliverfennell wrote: Even if that was what now happened, Khan has only made three defences, and he hasn't unified anything, so what is the logic?? No unification, only an ordinary number of defences so far, not even the number one in his division. What is "super" about that?
I know the answer obviously is more money for the WBA, but they should at least have a STATED reason, even if it's just to paper over the money-grabbing motives.
Yes. Especially when the WBA pull this shite. And with the whole "Silver" belt thing with the WBC, I couldn't bring myself to watch the Duddy fight.Dioufy wrote:Ha ha, don't sancationing bodies kill you a little inside.
Well in the super middleweight division andre ward is the wba super super middleweight champion and dmitri sartison is the regular wba champion.Basically its aload of bollocks designed to make sanctioning bodies more money the greedy shitsSyntax Error wrote:What is a 'Super' world champion?![]()
What happens if a 'Super' world champion loses, does he just become a 'normal' world champion?
I dont know if he was the super champion was he?I wasnt sure whether that was brought in after ward beat kessler but you're probably right.I wouldnt mind if they called in the interim title because of the super 6 going on but otherwise its a complete joke!orbtastic wrote:I honestly don't know how Kessler was "super" champ in the first place, given he lost to Calzaghe after unifiying and then had to fight for a vacant world title again.
He was super champ when he beat Beyer, which is understandable that's their rules etclefty wrote:I dont know if he was the super champion was he?I wasnt sure whether that was brought in after ward beat kessler but you're probably right.I wouldnt mind if they called in the interim title because of the super 6 going on but otherwise its a complete joke!orbtastic wrote:I honestly don't know how Kessler was "super" champ in the first place, given he lost to Calzaghe after unifiying and then had to fight for a vacant world title again.
it makes no sense whatsover!!Dont you just hate the greedy f$£$s!orbtastic wrote:He was super champ when he beat Beyer, which is understandable that's their rules etclefty wrote:I dont know if he was the super champion was he?I wasnt sure whether that was brought in after ward beat kessler but you're probably right.I wouldnt mind if they called in the interim title because of the super 6 going on but otherwise its a complete joke!orbtastic wrote:I honestly don't know how Kessler was "super" champ in the first place, given he lost to Calzaghe after unifiying and then had to fight for a vacant world title again.
Looking at his record again, it seems the super belt was only on the line when he fought Ward, which makes no sense at all.
Quick google says they promoted him in Nov 2009. My money would be on money i.e. they sanctioned a regular fight:
http://wbanews.com/artman/publish/news/ ... itle.shtml
Nonsense really.
in the wbc you have the full champion,the silver champion and the diamond champion right?Thats the ones i can think of off the top of my head!Dioufy wrote:I personally don't think you can justify having more that one champ per division if I'm honest. I guess we had to settle for 4 which saddened me, but I went with it. Now that we're getting 4 or 5 per sanctioning body is now too much. I am slowly, but gradually, falling out of love with this sport - I also don't think I'm the only one.
If you put your mind and heart to it you could win "The Little Pecker's WBC Honourable world champion" strap. It's shiny with cum-stains on it.lefty wrote:in the wbc you have the full champion,the silver champion and the diamond champion right?Thats the ones i can think of off the top of my head!Dioufy wrote:I personally don't think you can justify having more that one champ per division if I'm honest. I guess we had to settle for 4 which saddened me, but I went with it. Now that we're getting 4 or 5 per sanctioning body is now too much. I am slowly, but gradually, falling out of love with this sport - I also don't think I'm the only one.
Dioufy wrote:If you put your mind and heart to it you could win "The Little Pecker's WBC Honourable world champion" strap. It's shiny with cum stains on it.lefty wrote:in the wbc you have the full champion,the silver champion and the diamond champion right?Thats the ones i can think of off the top of my head!Dioufy wrote:I personally don't think you can justify having more that one champ per division if I'm honest. I guess we had to settle for 4 which saddened me, but I went with it. Now that we're getting 4 or 5 per sanctioning body is now too much. I am slowly, but gradually, falling out of love with this sport - I also don't think I'm the only one.
interim, champion emeritus and fedelatin( a latin title once held by that famous latino andrew golota)Dioufy wrote:If you put your mind and heart to it you could win "The Little Pecker's WBC Honourable world champion" strap. It's shiny with cum-stains on it.lefty wrote:in the wbc you have the full champion,the silver champion and the diamond champion right?Thats the ones i can think of off the top of my head!Dioufy wrote:I personally don't think you can justify having more that one champ per division if I'm honest. I guess we had to settle for 4 which saddened me, but I went with it. Now that we're getting 4 or 5 per sanctioning body is now too much. I am slowly, but gradually, falling out of love with this sport - I also don't think I'm the only one.
Just shows that we should judge fighters on their individual characteristics rather than what crappy belt they possessAdamj1987 wrote:interim, champion emeritus and fedelatin( a latin title once held by that famous latino andrew golota)Dioufy wrote:If you put your mind and heart to it you could win "The Little Pecker's WBC Honourable world champion" strap. It's shiny with cum-stains on it.lefty wrote: in the wbc you have the full champion,the silver champion and the diamond champion right?Thats the ones i can think of off the top of my head!
indeed i belive teh fight was Mike Mollo (then holder) Vs Andrew Golota and golotta got a really busted up eyelefty wrote:Just shows that we should judge fighters on their individual characteristics rather than what crappy belt they possessAdamj1987 wrote:interim, champion emeritus and fedelatin( a latin title once held by that famous latino andrew golota)Dioufy wrote: If you put your mind and heart to it you could win "The Little Pecker's WBC Honourable world champion" strap. It's shiny with cum-stains on it.
dont get me startedAdamj1987 wrote:indeed i belive teh fight was Mike Mollo (then holder) Vs Andrew Golota and golotta got a really busted up eyelefty wrote:Just shows that we should judge fighters on their individual characteristics rather than what crappy belt they possessAdamj1987 wrote: interim, champion emeritus and fedelatin( a latin title once held by that famous latino andrew golota)
also sergio martinez is emeritus champion but they stripped him of the title and made him a WBC overseas peace diplomat (something along those lines) does that count?
lefty wrote:dont get me startedAdamj1987 wrote:indeed i belive teh fight was Mike Mollo (then holder) Vs Andrew Golota and golotta got a really busted up eyelefty wrote: Just shows that we should judge fighters on their individual characteristics rather than what crappy belt they possess
also sergio martinez is emeritus champion but they stripped him of the title and made him a WBC overseas peace diplomat (something along those lines) does that count?
lol well i guess atleast peter showed that he was the true champ in beating maskaev but you're completely right!Boxing really needs some serious rich investor to come in and buy out the sanctioning bodies and restructure the damn thingAdamj1987 wrote:lefty wrote:dont get me startedAdamj1987 wrote: indeed i belive teh fight was Mike Mollo (then holder) Vs Andrew Golota and golotta got a really busted up eye
also sergio martinez is emeritus champion but they stripped him of the title and made him a WBC overseas peace diplomat (something along those lines) does that count?i know so many titles with 1 organization
best quote i remember was: "i'm glad i unified the titles" by sam peter after uniting his Full WBC title with Oleg Maskaevs Full WBC title that he had be stripped of then he sued the WBC and was declared champion so there were 2 full WBC champions at the same time