Political Reasons? Mitchell vs. Murray

whicker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4550
Joined: 01 Jan 2008, 01:52

Re: Political Reasons? Mitchell vs. Murray

Post by whicker »

Seriosuly though- political reasons? What the hell?????
Grays_Dan
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 203
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 16:49

Re: Political Reasons? Mitchell vs. Murray

Post by Grays_Dan »

Apparently they wanted Kevin to basically sell the arena using his "West Ham" fanbase then pay him peanuts.
nh1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 153
Joined: 09 Sep 2008, 15:13

Re: Political Reasons? Mitchell vs. Murray

Post by nh1 »

Take a look at FW's latest column (available via the Scene): he's very critical of Mitchell, and says there were no 'political reasons', and that it was all about money.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Political Reasons? Mitchell vs. Murray

Post by leforge »

nh1 wrote:Take a look at FW's latest column (available via the Scene): he's very critical of Mitchell, and says there were no 'political reasons', and that it was all about money.
Mitchell wants a final payday as Murray will stop him easily!
alexpaterson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4310
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22

Re: Political Reasons? Mitchell vs. Murray

Post by alexpaterson »

Camcas wrote:Want to see Murray fight Brandon Rios next, but know its not going to happen so i not really sure who he can fight Katsidis maybe but feel hed win that easily?? As for Mitchell im not really bothered
Rios is fighting for the World Title against Acosta and Katsidis is fighting Guerrero on the Maidana/Morales card :TU:
fasteddie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 812
Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 21:40

Re: Political Reasons? Mitchell vs. Murray

Post by fasteddie »

murray vs rees is murray's fight every day of the week,rees struggled with watson were as murray will just grind you down take your best shots and still keep coming he is a throw back from the school and anyone involved in the sport of boxing loves his no nonesense style
Camcas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 881
Joined: 12 Sep 2010, 14:18

Re: Political Reasons? Mitchell vs. Murray

Post by Camcas »

alexpaterson wrote:
Camcas wrote:Want to see Murray fight Brandon Rios next, but know its not going to happen so i not really sure who he can fight Katsidis maybe but feel hed win that easily?? As for Mitchell im not really bothered
Rios is fighting for the World Title against Acosta and Katsidis is fighting Guerrero on the Maidana/Morales card :TU:
woops my bad :TU:
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Political Reasons? Mitchell vs. Murray

Post by Horse »

They should make:

Murray vs Rees
Mitchell vs Arthur
TheCobra
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3450
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 15:11

Re: Political Reasons? Mitchell vs. Murray

Post by TheCobra »

nh1 wrote:Take a look at FW's latest column (available via the Scene): he's very critical of Mitchell, and says there were no 'political reasons', and that it was all about money.
Warren hanging Mitchell out to dry methinks. He's obviously had enough of Mitchell's messing about, definitely saying 'sink or swim'.
Dan Dares
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1584
Joined: 29 Nov 2010, 16:33

Re: Political Reasons? Mitchell vs. Murray

Post by Dan Dares »

Interesting that Kevin's brother Vinny hasn't fought since May last year at Upton Park either. I reckon Barry Hearn shld make a move for the Mitchells - he could put on fights at Brisbane Rd for f**k all (and lets face it, the only Mitchell your likely to see fight at Upton Park is Billy Mitchell. And thats only if he's pissed.)
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23132
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Political Reasons? Mitchell vs. Murray

Post by mickey1975 »

TheCobra wrote:
nh1 wrote:Take a look at FW's latest column (available via the Scene): he's very critical of Mitchell, and says there were no 'political reasons', and that it was all about money.
Warren hanging Mitchell out to dry methinks. He's obviously had enough of Mitchell's messing about, definitely saying 'sink or swim'.
I got that impression right from the post fight press conference for the Katsidis fight.FW invested heavily in putting it on a plate for Mitchell at Upton Park,he was seething hearing his excuses.I dont think the fight will happen now,FW will want to move Murray on and is hardly going to reward Mitchell after this.
Des1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 872
Joined: 07 Dec 2006, 10:11

Re: Political Reasons? Mitchell vs. Murray

Post by Des1 »

mickey1975 wrote:
TheCobra wrote:
nh1 wrote:Take a look at FW's latest column (available via the Scene): he's very critical of Mitchell, and says there were no 'political reasons', and that it was all about money.
Warren hanging Mitchell out to dry methinks. He's obviously had enough of Mitchell's messing about, definitely saying 'sink or swim'.
I got that impression right from the post fight press conference for the Katsidis fight.FW invested heavily in putting it on a plate for Mitchell at Upton Park,he was seething hearing his excuses.I dont think the fight will happen now,FW will want to move Murray on and is hardly going to reward Mitchell after this.
Where's this FW's latest column (via the Scene)?
nh1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 153
Joined: 09 Sep 2008, 15:13

Re: Political Reasons? Mitchell vs. Murray

Post by nh1 »

Des1 wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:
TheCobra wrote: Warren hanging Mitchell out to dry methinks. He's obviously had enough of Mitchell's messing about, definitely saying 'sink or swim'.
I got that impression right from the post fight press conference for the Katsidis fight.FW invested heavily in putting it on a plate for Mitchell at Upton Park,he was seething hearing his excuses.I dont think the fight will happen now,FW will want to move Murray on and is hardly going to reward Mitchell after this.
Where's this FW's latest column (via the Scene)?
Here's the link, Des:
http://www.BS.com/frank-warren ... ore--36138
Grays_Dan
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 203
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 16:49

Re: Political Reasons? Mitchell vs. Murray

Post by Grays_Dan »

Dan Dares wrote:Interesting that Kevin's brother Vinny hasn't fought since May last year at Upton Park either.
Vinny was due to fight at York Hall last night but fight got cancelled few weeks back due to injury
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Political Reasons? Mitchell vs. Murray

Post by Final round »

Must be a bit of a wake up call when your own promoter publicly turns against you.
earsjohn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1691
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 14:34

Re: Political Reasons? Mitchell vs. Murray

Post by earsjohn »

You have to love the hypocrisy of a promoter, known for criticising his former charges lack of loyalty, so publically hanging one of his fighters out to dry after a single defeat! Shameful behaviour.
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Political Reasons? Mitchell vs. Murray

Post by Final round »

earsjohn wrote:You have to love the hypocrisy of a promoter, known for criticising his former charges lack of loyalty, so publically hanging one of his fighters out to dry after a single defeat! Shameful behaviour.

You drove the nail right through with that one!
TheCobra
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3450
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 15:11

Re: Political Reasons? Mitchell vs. Murray

Post by TheCobra »

earsjohn wrote:You have to love the hypocrisy of a promoter, known for criticising his former charges lack of loyalty, so publically hanging one of his fighters out to dry after a single defeat! Shameful behaviour.
Yep have to agree with this, whatever Kevin has done behind the scenes, be it poor prepapration for the Katsidis fight or anything else, it seems a bit unprofessional to hang one of his own fighters out to dry like that in the press. You don't get on the wrong side of Frank I suppose!
Deadendgeneration
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1906
Joined: 21 Feb 2009, 19:01

Re: Political Reasons? Mitchell vs. Murray

Post by Deadendgeneration »

earsjohn wrote:You have to love the hypocrisy of a promoter, known for criticising his former charges lack of loyalty, so publically hanging one of his fighters out to dry after a single defeat! Shameful behaviour.

Spot on.
Scottrf
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1146
Joined: 30 Nov 2010, 05:43

Re: Political Reasons? Mitchell vs. Murray

Post by Scottrf »

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/9403596.stm

Considering retirement apparently. Locked into a 5 fight deal but doesn't like the money offered by Warren. Would be a real shame.
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

Re: Political Reasons? Mitchell vs. Murray

Post by hurlock »

Deadendgeneration wrote:
earsjohn wrote:You have to love the hypocrisy of a promoter, known for criticising his former charges lack of loyalty, so publically hanging one of his fighters out to dry after a single defeat! Shameful behaviour.

Spot on.

the man gets criticised for padding fighters up & now not looking after them :!:

mitchell is a proffesional, wether he decided to go & party with his purse or get straight back in the gym is he's problem.what a way to crash back on the scene :!:
i dont know how much he was offerd, i cant imagine it being poor :!: not forgetting he got exposed by a man who failed to win the crown.
winkveron
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 802
Joined: 08 Dec 2008, 12:31

Re: Political Reasons? Mitchell vs. Murray

Post by winkveron »

I don't see the problem here. He's been offered half of the purse he got for the Katsidis fight, to fight Murray. That makes sense for a few reasons-

a) it's for the European, not world title like against Katsidis.
b) he's not topping the bill in a major stadium event.
c) he's coming off a loss
d) he was acting like an idiot in the build up to his previous fight regarding the booze and his mrs. if I'm not mistaken.

Basically, I think Frank's done well offering him this fight straight after a defeat. He could've been dumped into a obscure 6 rounder for his comeback but he's got a high-profile fight in which a win could catapult him back onto the world scene. In my opinion he just doesn't fancy the job.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Political Reasons? Mitchell vs. Murray

Post by Horse »

Scottrf wrote:Considering retirement apparently. Locked into a 5 fight deal but doesn't like the money offered by Warren. Would be a real shame.
Warren will offer him other fights than just the Murray fight, won't he?

Will there be an expiry date on the contract?
Scottrf
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1146
Joined: 30 Nov 2010, 05:43

Re: Political Reasons? Mitchell vs. Murray

Post by Scottrf »

He probably doesn't want to feel like he's going backwards, but I think he just has to accept the reality of the sort of purse he should be getting for this. Boxing is a tough game and one loss can mean you have to work your way back up. Perhaps he is setting up a bargaining position, or perhaps he just can't cope with defeat and his heart isn't in it.

I dunno Horse, but presumably Warren is losing patience considering his public comments. No idea about the expiry date mate, just linked the article.
Des1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 872
Joined: 07 Dec 2006, 10:11

Re: Political Reasons? Mitchell vs. Murray

Post by Des1 »

nh1 wrote:
Des1 wrote:
mickey1975 wrote: I got that impression right from the post fight press conference for the Katsidis fight.FW invested heavily in putting it on a plate for Mitchell at Upton Park,he was seething hearing his excuses.I dont think the fight will happen now,FW will want to move Murray on and is hardly going to reward Mitchell after this.
Where's this FW's latest column (via the Scene)?
Here's the link, Des:
http://www.BS.com/frank-warren ... ore--36138
:TU: thanks nh1
Post Reply