Why Sky Why?
Why Sky Why?
How can they justify a show like tonights?
Murray is a 33/1 on (betfair) favourite against a nobody opponent (look at his record, what a joke) as the Main Event, and little notable support, which might not even be live anyway.
This is beyond poor.
Sky or allegedly, feel free to reply.
Murray is a 33/1 on (betfair) favourite against a nobody opponent (look at his record, what a joke) as the Main Event, and little notable support, which might not even be live anyway.
This is beyond poor.
Sky or allegedly, feel free to reply.
Re: Why Sky Why?
Sky should not be allowing it. Very poor show again from warren promotions. Seem to be saving competitive fights for ppv only!whicker wrote:How can they justify a show like tonights?
Murray is a 33/1 on (betfair) favourite against a nobody opponent (look at his record, what a joke) as the Main Event, and little notable support, which might not even be live anyway.
This is beyond poor.
Sky or allegedly, feel free to reply.
Re: Why Sky Why?
I agree, it is a very poor main event and undercard.
What time does the Helenius vs Peter fight start? I think I will watch that instead if they are on at the same time.
What time does the Helenius vs Peter fight start? I think I will watch that instead if they are on at the same time.
Re: Why Sky Why?
Murray is a 40/1 on now.
i av to agree sky should not allowed this fight this is a poor fight for some one like Murray
i av to agree sky should not allowed this fight this is a poor fight for some one like Murray
Re: Why Sky Why?
Broadcast starts at 9.15. The German card looks much more interesting than this 40/1 nonsense.Horse wrote:I agree, it is a very poor main event and undercard.
What time does the Helenius vs Peter fight start? I think I will watch that instead if they are on at the same time.
Re: Why Sky Why?
Thanks.bfchunk wrote:Broadcast starts at 9.15. The German card looks much more interesting than this 40/1 nonsense.
Murray's last fight was a 30/1 type of joke as well. Murray's European title run has been weak.
Re: Why Sky Why?
I've seen odds of 100/1-on for a Murray win.
:x
:x
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23132
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Why Sky Why?
Its basically a showcase for Murray with Mitchell ringside so they can plug a fight between them to sell to us on PPV!
Re: Why Sky Why?
A fight with Mitchell makes no sense for Murray.
Murray should be fighting for a world title and a fight with Mitchell, great as it may be for boxing fans, is too big a risk, for too little reward. He's already on the cusp of a title shot.
Murray should be fighting for a world title and a fight with Mitchell, great as it may be for boxing fans, is too big a risk, for too little reward. He's already on the cusp of a title shot.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23132
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Why Sky Why?
It will ba good payday and quite a high profile fight in Britain.I bet FW and Sky push for it.I dont see it as a massive risk,either.Finch wrote:A fight with Mitchell makes no sense for Murray.
Murray should be fighting for a world title and a fight with Mitchell, great as it may be for boxing fans, is too big a risk, for too little reward. He's already on the cusp of a title shot.
Re: Why Sky Why?
Why isn't Mitchell on the undercard?mickey1975 wrote:Its basically a showcase for Murray with Mitchell ringside so they can plug a fight between them to sell to us on PPV!
He hasn't fought in over 10 1/2 months and hasn't won a fight in over a year. He needs a warm up more than Murray does.
Re: Why Sky Why?
Horse, good question.
He came across on Ringside as he wasn't sure about his future plans. He surely can't wait another 3 or 4 months to fight Murray?
He came across on Ringside as he wasn't sure about his future plans. He surely can't wait another 3 or 4 months to fight Murray?
Re: Why Sky Why?
I must repeat.... I have seen odds of 100/1-on for a Muzza win.

Re: Why Sky Why?
Yes, Dioufy, it is a pathetic fight.Dioufy wrote:I must repeat.... I have seen odds of 100/1-on for a Muzza win.
A main event shown on Sky should never really be worse than 4/1 (and that would be bad). This fight wouldn't even be a very interesting undercard fight. Absolute trash.
Re: Why Sky Why?
Hence why Mr.Horse wrote:Yes, Dioufy, it is a pathetic fight.Dioufy wrote:I must repeat.... I have seen odds of 100/1-on for a Muzza win.
A main event shown on Sky should never really be worse than 4/1 (and that would be bad). This fight wouldn't even be a very interesting undercard fight. Absolute trash.
now doesn't have a Sky Sports subscription.Re: Why Sky Why?
Did you cancel it because of this fight? Or because of the general low quality of their recent boxing shows?Dioufy wrote:Hence why Mr. http://www.virginmedia.com/images/el-ha ... -hated.jpg now doesn't have a Sky Sports subscription.
Re: Why Sky Why?
coz he spat on his telly
Re: Why Sky Why?
Because of the low-level crap we get served up. Murray's been above 20/1-on ever since Meager, IMO.Horse wrote:Did you cancel it because of this fight? Or because of the general low quality of their recent boxing shows?Dioufy wrote:Hence why Mr. http://www.virginmedia.com/images/el-ha ... -hated.jpg now doesn't have a Sky Sports subscription.
Re: Why Sky Why?
Just to clarify, Horse, I cancelled about 18 months ago. Money well saved.
Re: Why Sky Why?
Did you though? :)
-
Tommy Gunn13
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3290
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11
Re: Why Sky Why?
Surely the Thaxton fight was alot closer in the betting stakes??Dioufy wrote:Because of the low-level crap we get served up. Murray's been above 20/1-on ever since Meager, IMO.Horse wrote:Did you cancel it because of this fight? Or because of the general low quality of their recent boxing shows?Dioufy wrote:Hence why Mr. http://www.virginmedia.com/images/el-ha ... -hated.jpg now doesn't have a Sky Sports subscription.
As someone said earlier in the thread i think Mr W is go to keep his even fights for ppv&i reckon we will be getting more of them(which is bollox)
Re: Why Sky Why?
The same Thaxton who was beat by Meezache and Glover? Nah, that fight was ridiculous. It should've happened a lot earlier. Thaxton was shot to bits, IMO.Tommy Gunn13 wrote:Surely the Thaxton fight was alot closer in the betting stakes??Dioufy wrote:Because of the low-level crap we get served up. Murray's been above 20/1-on ever since Meager, IMO.Horse wrote:Did you cancel it because of this fight? Or because of the general low quality of their recent boxing shows?
As someone said earlier in the thread i think Mr W is go to keep his even fights for ppv&i reckon we will be getting more of them(which is bollox)
Re: Why Sky Why?
If that's his game then I hope that other promoters get a proper crack next season. There are some class British level boxers about who would box till they dropped and do not get a look in.
The Khan v McCloskey PPV can stick it up their bollocks.
I'll have to watch DeGale v Groves though.
The Khan v McCloskey PPV can stick it up their bollocks.
I'll have to watch DeGale v Groves though.
-
Tommy Gunn13
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3290
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11
Re: Why Sky Why?
I totally agree with you he was finished but the odds wernt that far apartDioufy wrote:The same Thaxton who was beat by Meezache and Glover? Nah, that fight was ridiculous. It should've happened a lot earlier. Thaxton was shot to bits, IMO.Tommy Gunn13 wrote:Surely the Thaxton fight was alot closer in the betting stakes??Dioufy wrote: Because of the low-level crap we get served up. Murray's been above 20/1-on ever since Meager, IMO.
As someone said earlier in the thread i think Mr W is go to keep his even fights for ppv&i reckon we will be getting more of them(which is bollox)
Re: Why Sky Why?
Do you know what they were then? In my eyes, Johnno had no chance.Tommy Gunn13 wrote:I totally agree with you he was finished but the odds wernt that far apartDioufy wrote:The same Thaxton who was beat by Meezache and Glover? Nah, that fight was ridiculous. It should've happened a lot earlier. Thaxton was shot to bits, IMO.Tommy Gunn13 wrote: Surely the Thaxton fight was alot closer in the betting stakes??
As someone said earlier in the thread i think Mr W is go to keep his even fights for ppv&i reckon we will be getting more of them(which is bollox)