Gomez vs Sinan Sam

Post Reply
sachayoj2001
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3
Joined: 18 Jun 2005, 10:00

Gomez vs Sinan Sam

Post by sachayoj2001 »

Hello. Only one question. Why the fight Gomez vs Sinan Sam is now a NC?
Yesterday it was a win for Gomez by UD.
Thanks for all. The site is excellent.
JM
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12
Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 22:29

Post by JM »

Yeah i noticed the same...why would this fight be changed to a no-contest?? this fight took place so long ago...
Freiheit
Editor
Editor
Posts: 2851
Joined: 28 Dec 2001, 20:00

Post by Freiheit »

JM
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12
Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 22:29

Post by JM »

The fight took place 2 years ago!! how could he have tested positive? why such a delay?
Freiheit
Editor
Editor
Posts: 2851
Joined: 28 Dec 2001, 20:00

Post by Freiheit »

I think its because we only got the commission report now, but Im not sure.
AGP
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13
Joined: 01 Jul 2004, 02:27

Post by AGP »

And what about that?
Philadelphia Daily News, http://www.bradenton.com/mld/philly/spo ... 950776.htm

It is not widely known, but Cuban heavyweight Juan Carlos Gomez (37-0, 31 KOs), who scored a unanimous decision over Turkey's Sinan Samil Sam (18-1, 11 KOs) on the same card as Mesi-Williamson, was at first informed his victory had been declared a no-decision after he tested positive for a banned substance.

After 2 days, the New York State Athletic Commission - according to the record keepers at Fight Fax Inc. - restored Gomez's "W" when technicians at the medical facility that administered his prebout MRI confirmed they had had to give the claustrophobic fighter a sedative to calm him down before he would consent to entering the confined space of the MRI tube. Some ingredient in the sedative, it seems, was on the NYSAC's no-no list.
Was the decision overruled once again?
aldo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 401
Joined: 01 Apr 2005, 15:38

Post by aldo »

2 years later ????. Incredible, the boxing commissions seem handled by really morons, sometimes.
Post Reply