Frankie Gavin vs Young Mutley May 21st

crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Frankie Gavin vs Young Mutley May 21st

Post by crusader »

8)
hoot
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 192
Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 16:58

Re: Frankie Gavin vs Young Mutley May 21st

Post by hoot »

Pugilist-specialist wrote:
Camcas wrote:I dont see what the point in fighting this at 147lbs is Gavin is best suited fighting at 140lbs its seems, so why put him in fights at this weight when in his tougher fights further down the line he will be in a lower division
I agree with you.
Frankie is usually very forthright and quick to answer questions on here and I just wondered what his view was.

:TU:
Very easy to answer' brings the WBO itercontinental belt at 147lbs ' back to where it belongs, warren boxing organisation. then frankie will go back down to 140lbs to carry on. :OhYes:
fasteddie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 812
Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 21:40

Re: Frankie Gavin vs Young Mutley May 21st

Post by fasteddie »

didnt frankie say he was fighting at 140 to win titles in this division? so why refuse to fight adnan amar cause it was at 147 then fight mutley at 147?
Frankie Gavin
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 393
Joined: 09 Jul 2009, 17:39

Re: Frankie Gavin vs Young Mutley May 21st

Post by Frankie Gavin »

fasteddie wrote:didnt frankie say he was fighting at 140 to win titles in this division? so why refuse to fight adnan amar cause it was at 147 then fight mutley at 147?
Cause I am scared of adnan an mutley win looks better on my record
LeedsLad
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 996
Joined: 02 Jul 2010, 06:15

Re: Frankie Gavin vs Young Mutley May 21st

Post by LeedsLad »

At least you're honest :lol:
fasteddie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 812
Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 21:40

Re: Frankie Gavin vs Young Mutley May 21st

Post by fasteddie »

Frankie Gavin wrote:
fasteddie wrote:didnt frankie say he was fighting at 140 to win titles in this division? so why refuse to fight adnan amar cause it was at 147 then fight mutley at 147?
Cause I am scared of adnan an mutley win looks better on my record
haha fair enough,honesty is the best policy
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Frankie Gavin vs Young Mutley May 21st

Post by dondada »

Frankie Gavin wrote:
fasteddie wrote:didnt frankie say he was fighting at 140 to win titles in this division? so why refuse to fight adnan amar cause it was at 147 then fight mutley at 147?
Cause I am scared of adnan
:lol:
Pugilist-specialist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1632
Joined: 11 Jul 2008, 04:37

Re: Frankie Gavin vs Young Mutley May 21st

Post by Pugilist-specialist »

Frankie Gavin wrote:
fasteddie wrote:didnt frankie say he was fighting at 140 to win titles in this division? so why refuse to fight adnan amar cause it was at 147 then fight mutley at 147?
Cause I am scared of adnan an mutley win looks better on my record
Thanks Frankie.

Don't suppose there's much chance of Kell Brook being your first defence ?

:TU:
fasteddie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 812
Joined: 03 Feb 2010, 21:40

Re: Frankie Gavin vs Young Mutley May 21st

Post by fasteddie »

Pugilist-specialist wrote:
Frankie Gavin wrote:
fasteddie wrote:didnt frankie say he was fighting at 140 to win titles in this division? so why refuse to fight adnan amar cause it was at 147 then fight mutley at 147?
Cause I am scared of adnan an mutley win looks better on my record
Thanks Frankie.

Don't suppose there's much chance of Kell Brook being your first defence ?

:TU:
would be the best test for you that frankie seems as tho brook got his belt taken away for leaving fw,and this would shut your critics up and prove the gavin love train right :TU:
jessi
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3008
Joined: 11 Jul 2010, 11:59

Re: Frankie Gavin vs Young Mutley May 21st

Post by jessi »

Pugilist-specialist wrote:
Frankie Gavin wrote:
fasteddie wrote:didnt frankie say he was fighting at 140 to win titles in this division? so why refuse to fight adnan amar cause it was at 147 then fight mutley at 147?
Cause I am scared of adnan an mutley win looks better on my record
Thanks Frankie.

Don't suppose there's much chance of Kell Brook being your first defence ?

:TU:
would love to see gavin v brook ! kell has called him out already, gavin is so good he would probably win, could you imagine that ? :TU:
Frankie Gavin
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 393
Joined: 09 Jul 2009, 17:39

Re: Frankie Gavin vs Young Mutley May 21st

Post by Frankie Gavin »

jessi wrote:
Pugilist-specialist wrote:
Frankie Gavin wrote: Cause I am scared of adnan an mutley win looks better on my record
Thanks Frankie.

Don't suppose there's much chance of Kell Brook being your first defence ?

:TU:
would love to see gavin v brook ! kell has called him out already, gavin is so good he would probably win, could you imagine that ? :TU:
If nothin comes at light welter y not
Pugilist-specialist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1632
Joined: 11 Jul 2008, 04:37

Re: Frankie Gavin vs Young Mutley May 21st

Post by Pugilist-specialist »

Frankie!

After watching your stablemate struggle with a novice from the Ingles gym, did your trainer or matchmaker advise you to steer clear of Amar ?

:TU:
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Frankie Gavin vs Young Mutley May 21st

Post by Counter-puncher »

Pugilist- give it up on Amar, already. he's fought once in the last 2 years, twice in the last 4 or so. boxing doesn't seem to be his thing, really. he may still have his name as some kind of eliminator but its well outdated. i would not be at all surprised if he never fought again.
jessi
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3008
Joined: 11 Jul 2010, 11:59

Re: Frankie Gavin vs Young Mutley May 21st

Post by jessi »

Pugilist-specialist wrote:Frankie!

After watching your stablemate struggle with a novice from the Ingles gym, did your trainer or matchmaker advise you to steer clear of Amar ?

:TU:
Why are people so gullable, i think frankie was joking mate ! :lol:
jessi
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3008
Joined: 11 Jul 2010, 11:59

Re: Frankie Gavin vs Young Mutley May 21st

Post by jessi »

Frankie Gavin wrote:
jessi wrote:
Pugilist-specialist wrote: Thanks Frankie.

Don't suppose there's much chance of Kell Brook being your first defence ?

:TU:
would love to see gavin v brook ! kell has called him out already, gavin is so good he would probably win, could you imagine that ? :TU:
If nothin comes at light welter y not
Ha Ha, Brook is good but never had the same amateur pedigree as you, Love your confidence mate, good luck on the 21st, i know mutley is alot tougher opponent then his given credit for.
Pugilist-specialist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1632
Joined: 11 Jul 2008, 04:37

Re: Frankie Gavin vs Young Mutley May 21st

Post by Pugilist-specialist »

jessi wrote:
Pugilist-specialist wrote:
Frankie Gavin wrote: Cause I am scared of adnan an mutley win looks better on my record
Thanks Frankie.

Don't suppose there's much chance of Kell Brook being your first defence ?

:TU:
would love to see gavin v brook ! kell has called him out already, gavin is so good he would probably win, could you imagine that ? :TU:
No I couldn't imagine that.

:TU:
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Frankie Gavin vs Young Mutley May 21st

Post by whiskey »

When I was at a weigh in at Nottingham before Frankie signed terms with anyone, he was stood near Amar (think it was Witter vs Bradley) and he is a big lad, more suited to 154 than 147.

That was a couple of years ago mind, and Frankie's matured since then and grew more into his weight class.

But Amar is unorthadox, pretty strong and slippery - not a great recipe to showcase a fighter; It's likely the reason he hasn't fought too often of late either.

I suspect Mutley can punch harder, but is slower on his feet and more suited to where Frankie's career is at right now.
jessi
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3008
Joined: 11 Jul 2010, 11:59

Re: Frankie Gavin vs Young Mutley May 21st

Post by jessi »

Pugilist-specialist wrote:
jessi wrote:
Pugilist-specialist wrote: Thanks Frankie.

Don't suppose there's much chance of Kell Brook being your first defence ?

:TU:
would love to see gavin v brook ! kell has called him out already, gavin is so good he would probably win, could you imagine that ? :TU:
No I couldn't imagine that.

:TU:
i can ! :TU:
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Frankie Gavin vs Young Mutley May 21st

Post by Counter-puncher »

G0mez wrote:When I was at a weigh in at Nottingham before Frankie signed terms with anyone, he was stood near Amar (think it was Witter vs Bradley) and he is a big lad, more suited to 154 than 147.

But Amar is unorthadox, pretty strong and slippery - not a great recipe to showcase a fighter; It's likely the reason he hasn't fought too often of late either.

.
amar certainly big at the weight and extremely awkward but i would guess there's more to it than that behind him fighting twice in 4 years.....
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Frankie Gavin vs Young Mutley May 21st

Post by whiskey »

Counter-puncher wrote:
G0mez wrote:When I was at a weigh in at Nottingham before Frankie signed terms with anyone, he was stood near Amar (think it was Witter vs Bradley) and he is a big lad, more suited to 154 than 147.

But Amar is unorthadox, pretty strong and slippery - not a great recipe to showcase a fighter; It's likely the reason he hasn't fought too often of late either.

.
amar certainly big at the weight and extremely awkward but i would guess there's more to it than that behind him fighting twice in 4 years.....
I know Adnan and have his number. He is still working out, I spar sometimes with his brother Mo and Adnan is without a promoter and elimnator fights have fell through of late up in scotland etc.

He wants to fight, believe me.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Frankie Gavin vs Young Mutley May 21st

Post by Counter-puncher »

fair play, thanks for that gomez :TU:
Post Reply