I imagine plenty of it has been debunked. But I still think there is plenty in it to raise major questions! Even if you just collate all the footage or lack of from the 3 incidents and the eye witness and media reports at the time. IMO, no way did a commercial airliner
crash into the pentagon, no way was the flight that was brought down done so by its passengers.....and the one I'm not so sure about, but remain sceptical of is how two buildings would fall in that manner, when it seems to go against all laws of engineering and physics.
Do you have any links to it being debunked?
Off Topic: Bin Laden Killed by US Forces
-
Feargal....
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 178
- Joined: 26 Jun 2010, 16:20
Re: Off Topic: Bin Laden Killed by US Forces
Bin Laden shouldn't have being killed. By killing him in cold blood he only becomes a martyr and only leads to more people joining terrorist groups. He should have being captured and given to the The international criminal court in the Hague (He would most likely not get a fair trial in the US or Britain).
Re: Off Topic: Bin Laden Killed by US Forces
As someone who believes he committed a criminal, rather than a military, act, and who hated this phrase "war" on terror, and also someone who is a liberal and believes in the rule of law, I think it would have been better for him to be taken alive and put on trail.FeargalóCuinneagáin wrote:Bin Laden shouldn't have being killed. By killing him in cold blood he only becomes a martyr and only leads to more people joining terrorist groups. He should have being captured and given to the The international criminal court in the Hague (He would most likely not get a fair trial in the US or Britain).
I'm also enough of a pragmatist to realize two things: (1) operationally, you have a duty of care to the men who you send after him, and if they have any doubt, or there are moments of hesitation, people can be killed, and (2) if there was a trail, it would be an absolute circus and a clarion call to every Muslim out there, as Bin Laden would have the highest profile advertising -- probably for months and months -- to hold forth his Qutbist ideas.
So, I understand why they essentially executed him. I can't bring myself to agree with it, but I understand it.
Re: Off Topic: Bin Laden Killed by US Forces
He's probably been dead for years but now seemed a gd time to put the story otu to fit their agenda. It's all staged propaganda bullshit, they already changed their story 3 times within as many days.exittored wrote:You do realise there was no actual evidence linking Bin Laden with 9/11 or that there's no such thing as al qaeda but hey don't let Facts get in the way of a good story, carry on believing in fairytales the government controlled media tells you.
This really was the last window of opportunity for Obama to announce the capture/death of Bin Laden. September 11th 2011 would have marked the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 attack and the biggest question the Media would have been asking was 'How come Bin Laden hasn't be found' so it was really now or never as any time from September would have been too convenient and even the 'sheeple' would have questioned the story after that with his re-election year coming up in 2012.
Also very convenient he was killed...so America has at it's disposal the most modern tools of warefare including stun grenades, flash and tear gas and have a house surrounded and they can't take him alive or at least partly injured, absolute bullshit and stops America having to put him on trial and actually come up with some Evidence to try him or have certain Facts revealed.
We the people have been duped yet again although some of us are more AWAKE then others!
The UK media actually put up faked pictures of Osama's dead body on their websites but had to pull them when they were found to be fake, they will print any shite to get hits. reasons for not releasing video/photo evidence is because apparently the pictures are too gruesome but they had no problems releasing pictures of Saddam and his dead sons. Haven't they already desensitized us over the years whilst they have dropped bombs from afar killing 100's of thousands of civillians, which is of course a damn site lot more than 'Al Qaeda' were responsible for. These guys are scum and worse than the 'terrorists' they set out to kill. Only recently gadaffi was condemned for allowing his ppl to use cluster bombs as it 'violated international law' but the same news outlets, the main stream media, didn't kick up much fuss when Israel used them against the Palestines. "He may be a son of a bitch but he's our son of a bitch" :P
ffs our goverment have been violating UN laws for years. Please stand in the corner gaddafy and do not fight back whilst we blow the fornicate out of you and your family with B52's....
So osama was buried at sea to respect islamic law
-
hitman_hatton1
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6148
- Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57
Re: Off Topic: Bin Laden Killed by US Forces
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMyKhVwj6GIWax On wrote:I imagine plenty of it has been debunked. But I still think there is plenty in it to raise major questions! Even if you just collate all the footage or lack of from the 3 incidents and the eye witness and media reports at the time. IMO, no way did a commercial airliner
crash into the pentagon, no way was the flight that was brought down done so by its passengers.....and the one I'm not so sure about, but remain sceptical of is how two buildings would fall in that manner, when it seems to go against all laws of engineering and physics.
Do you have http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AnGyMC_j0qMany links to it being debunked?
part 1 (follow the links)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AnGyMC_j0qM
i like that one cos it talks about the structural issues.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technol ... ws/1227842
Re: Off Topic: Bin Laden Killed by US Forces
Cheers hitman. That's my evening's viewing sorted :)
Re: Off Topic: Bin Laden Killed by US Forces
100% spot on Ivlarc, exactly how it is......lvlarc wrote:He's probably been dead for years but now seemed a gd time to put the story otu to fit their agenda. It's all staged propaganda bullshit, they already changed their story 3 times within as many days.exittored wrote:You do realise there was no actual evidence linking Bin Laden with 9/11 or that there's no such thing as al qaeda but hey don't let Facts get in the way of a good story, carry on believing in fairytales the government controlled media tells you.
This really was the last window of opportunity for Obama to announce the capture/death of Bin Laden. September 11th 2011 would have marked the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 attack and the biggest question the Media would have been asking was 'How come Bin Laden hasn't be found' so it was really now or never as any time from September would have been too convenient and even the 'sheeple' would have questioned the story after that with his re-election year coming up in 2012.
Also very convenient he was killed...so America has at it's disposal the most modern tools of warefare including stun grenades, flash and tear gas and have a house surrounded and they can't take him alive or at least partly injured, absolute bullshit and stops America having to put him on trial and actually come up with some Evidence to try him or have certain Facts revealed.
We the people have been duped yet again although some of us are more AWAKE then others!
The UK media actually put up faked pictures of Osama's dead body on their websites but had to pull them when they were found to be fake, they will print any shite to get hits. reasons for not releasing video/photo evidence is because apparently the pictures are too gruesome but they had no problems releasing pictures of Saddam and his dead sons. Haven't they already desensitized us over the years whilst they have dropped bombs from afar killing 100's of thousands of civillians, which is of course a damn site lot more than 'Al Qaeda' were responsible for. These guys are scum and worse than the 'terrorists' they set out to kill. Only recently gadaffi was condemned for allowing his ppl to use cluster bombs as it 'violated international law' but the same news outlets, the main stream media, didn't kick up much fuss when Israel used them against the Palestines. "He may be a son of a bitch but he's our son of a bitch" :P
ffs our goverment have been violating UN laws for years. Please stand in the corner gaddafy and do not fight back whilst we blow the eff out of you and your family with B52's....
So osama was buried at sea to respect islamic lawits a joke but whats funnier is that most of the public are so gullible they will buy it and who can blame them when we are just small fry in reality, although actually it's quite scary. So this will take the headlines for a few weeks before it's swept under the carpet whilst they come up with new reasons to invade other countries...
-
freddydoesdallas
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 9436
- Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48
Re: Off Topic: Bin Laden Killed by US Forces
If anyone does want something to read around this kind of area then i would recommend 'The Looming Tower' by Lawrence Wright. Good read, very detailed and informative
-
jtourettes
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 819
- Joined: 20 Feb 2009, 07:24
Re: Off Topic: Bin Laden Killed by US Forces
http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/Wax On wrote:Has anybody on here seen the internet film, Loose Change about 9/11. I'm no conspiracy theorist, but I've always felt there was something very dodgy about the information we were fed on the events of that day, even from my own limited experience of what went on watching the original eye witness accounts live on the day. If you've not seen it, spend 75 minutes watching it and see what you think. I certainly believe little that the US government has to say, and I feel the same about the whole Osama Bin Ladin affair recently.