6 defeats, none avenged, biting off ears, attempting to break arms, biting thighs... use of ugly profanities etc etc etc... sound like an all time great to anyone here???.......
ALI VS. TYSON
Boxing has everything to do with mental strength and mental flaws... this is the real difference between being a true great and an also ran in boxing and anyone who knows boxing knows this. Had Tyson the mentality of a Frazier or Marciano then he would have achieved much more and may well have proved himself an all time great but he was severely flawed even at his 'prime' and hence he does not merit a place amongst the all time greats.
6 defeats, none avenged, biting off ears, attempting to break arms, biting thighs... use of ugly profanities etc etc etc... sound like an all time great to anyone here???.......
6 defeats, none avenged, biting off ears, attempting to break arms, biting thighs... use of ugly profanities etc etc etc... sound like an all time great to anyone here???.......
silkov wrote:Boxing has everything to do with mental strength and mental flaws... this is the real difference between being a true great and an also ran in boxing and anyone who knows boxing knows this. Had Tyson the mentality of a Frazier or Marciano then he would have achieved much more and may well have proved himself an all time great but he was severely flawed even at his 'prime' and hence he does not merit a place amongst the all time greats.
6 defeats, none avenged, biting off ears, attempting to break arms, biting thighs... use of ugly profanities etc etc etc... sound like an all time great to anyone here???.......
bollox wrote:silkov wrote:Boxing has everything to do with mental strength and mental flaws... this is the real difference between being a true great and an also ran in boxing and anyone who knows boxing knows this. Had Tyson the mentality of a Frazier or Marciano then he would have achieved much more and may well have proved himself an all time great but he was severely flawed even at his 'prime' and hence he does not merit a place amongst the all time greats.
6 defeats, none avenged, biting off ears, attempting to break arms, biting thighs... use of ugly profanities etc etc etc... sound like an all time great to anyone here???.......spot on. Tyson in a nutshell
Indeed Bollox old bean! ....and 'nutshell'
Dear Grimm,Grimm wrote:What really would have happened if Muhammad Ali faced Wilt Chamberlain?Sweet Scientist wrote:What do you think Wilt's reach was?KOJOE90 wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Wilt has to be in the top 10 - 20 athletes of all time.
He was in tremendous shape, A world class weight lifter, 7'0 tall with a ridiculous reach and he wasn't a big clumsy giant either he was very agile, he holds his state high school record for the long jump and 100 meter dash.
I actually believe that he would've beaten Ali and when he did there would be lot's of giants boxing instead of playing basketball.
This forum over here seems to be better suited to your intellectual capacity and perspective on the world: http://www.network54.com/Forum/201879
Check it out. Don't bother coming back and thanking me. I already know you will love it. In fact, don't bother coming back at all.
-Dapa
Re: WHAT
No, that's exactly my point, if you have never seen the man fight then how could you automatically say that it is just crazy for someone to say he could beat Ali?KOJOE90 wrote:Have you?Grimm wrote:Have you ever seen Wilt Chamberlain box?
If any of you are actually boxers and not just people who try to assume what it is like being in the ring, then you would know that someone a whole foot taller than you would need very limited boxing skills to give you hell.
I'm not going to go on about everything Wilt Chamberlain could do but he was truly a freak and could do almost anything.
I'm not saying that it was definite that either of them would win, but my bet would be on Chamberlain.
-
Sweet Scientist
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 815
- Joined: 13 Oct 2003, 18:19
Re: WHAT
Common fornicating sense...Grimm wrote:
No, that's exactly my point, if you have never seen the man fight then how could you automatically say that it is just crazy for someone to say he could beat Ali?
Go to your local gym, pick a professional fighter 3 or 4" shorter than you, and 20-30# lighter than you, then pick a fight with him...and you'll find out first hand what an experienced boxer can do to someone bigger...you also won't find many boxers who think a basketball player can beat a quality heavyweight boxer...If any of you are actually boxers and not just people who try to assume what it is like being in the ring, then you would know that someone a whole foot taller than you would need very limited boxing skills to give you hell.
There were hundreds of things Wilt couldn't do...especially beating a heavyweight champion...I'm not going to go on about everything Wilt Chamberlain could do but he was truly a freak and could do almost anything.
You were 'definite' in an earlier post...change your mind much?I'm not saying that it was definite that either of them would win, but my bet would be on Chamberlain.
Re: WHAT
I was not definite in my earlier post.You were 'definite' in an earlier post...change your mind much?
I clearly said that "I believe Chamberlain would've won" I didn't say it was impossible for Ali to win and that Chamberlain would definitely win.
Well you don't know this. Seing that he never fought one.There were hundreds of things Wilt couldn't do...especially beating a heavyweight champion...
If I go and beat the hell out of some middleweight at my gym I will prove nothing. 3 or 4 inches is not 11 or 12 inches anyway. 3 or 4 inches is not much of a difference at all.Go to your local gym, pick a professional fighter 3 or 4" shorter than you, and 20-30# lighter than you, then pick a fight with him...and you'll find out first hand what an experienced boxer can do to someone bigger...you also won't find many boxers who think a basketball player can beat a quality heavyweight boxer...
You've never boxed before have you?
-
Sweet Scientist
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 815
- Joined: 13 Oct 2003, 18:19
Re: WHAT
...no real boxer would say a basketball player could beat Ali...unless they suffer from pugilistic dementia...no real boxer would be intimidated by someone who never boxed...no real boxer would post something like that...if your 'boxing skills' match your intelligence, deductive reasoning, and common sense, you must really suck...Grimm wrote:I was not definite in my earlier post.You were 'definite' in an earlier post...change your mind much?
I clearly said that "I believe Chamberlain would've won" I didn't say it was impossible for Ali to win and that Chamberlain would definitely win.
Well you don't know this. Seing that he never fought one.There were hundreds of things Wilt couldn't do...especially beating a heavyweight champion...
If I go and beat the hell out of some middleweight at my gym I will prove nothing. 3 or 4 inches is not 11 or 12 inches anyway. 3 or 4 inches is not much of a difference at all.Go to your local gym, pick a professional fighter 3 or 4" shorter than you, and 20-30# lighter than you, then pick a fight with him...and you'll find out first hand what an experienced boxer can do to someone bigger...you also won't find many boxers who think a basketball player can beat a quality heavyweight boxer...
You've never boxed before have you?
-
Sweet Scientist
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 815
- Joined: 13 Oct 2003, 18:19
Re: WHAT
Sweet Scientist wrote:...no real boxer would say a basketball player could beat Ali...unless they suffer from pugilistic dementia...no real boxer would be intimidated by someone who never boxed...no real boxer would post something like that...if your 'boxing skills' match your intelligence, deductive reasoning, and common sense, you must really suck...Grimm wrote:I was not definite in my earlier post.You were 'definite' in an earlier post...change your mind much?
I clearly said that "I believe Chamberlain would've won" I didn't say it was impossible for Ali to win and that Chamberlain would definitely win.
Well you don't know this. Seing that he never fought one.There were hundreds of things Wilt couldn't do...especially beating a heavyweight champion...
If I go and beat the hell out of some middleweight at my gym I will prove nothing. 3 or 4 inches is not 11 or 12 inches anyway. 3 or 4 inches is not much of a difference at all.Go to your local gym, pick a professional fighter 3 or 4" shorter than you, and 20-30# lighter than you, then pick a fight with him...and you'll find out first hand what an experienced boxer can do to someone bigger...you also won't find many boxers who think a basketball player can beat a quality heavyweight boxer...
You've never boxed before have you?
So you aren't a boxer, just like I thought.
Well then, have a nice tall glass of shut the hell up.
-
Sweet Scientist
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 815
- Joined: 13 Oct 2003, 18:19
Re: WHAT
...well...how would you know how good I was...Chamberlain never boxed and you say he could have beaten Ali...Grimm wrote:
So you aren't a boxer, just like I thought.
Well then, have a nice tall glass of shut the hell up.
Do you even have a clue as to what you're talking about?
Well might as well educate you in the studies of english as well.Sweet Scientist wrote:Grimm wrote:
What really would have happened if Muhammad Ali faced Wilt Chamberlain?
I actually believe that he would've beaten Ali
sounds pretty 'definite' to me...![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Definite:2 a : free of all ambiguity, uncertainty, or obscurity .
Definite1 : having distinct or certain limits
Did I say that Wilt Chamberlain would beat I Ali?
NO. I said that I believe had they fought he would've won.
And I do believe that he would have won had they fought, I never said that I was absolutely positive that he would beat Ali, I just picked him to win.
Re: WHAT
Sweet Scientist wrote:...well...how would you know how good I was...Chamberlain never boxed and you say he could have beaten Ali...Grimm wrote:
So you aren't a boxer, just like I thought.
Well then, have a nice tall glass of shut the hell up.
Do you even have a clue as to what you're talking about?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
YOU are not Wilt Chamberlain.
Nor will you ever be able to achieve what he has done outside of basketball.
-
Sweet Scientist
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 815
- Joined: 13 Oct 2003, 18:19
Grimm wrote:Well might as well educate you in the studies of english as well.Sweet Scientist wrote:Grimm wrote:
What really would have happened if Muhammad Ali faced Wilt Chamberlain?
I actually believe that he would've beaten Ali
sounds pretty 'definite' to me...![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Definite:2 a : free of all ambiguity, uncertainty, or obscurity .
Definite1 : having distinct or certain limits
Did I say that Wilt Chamberlain would beat I Ali?
NO. I said that I believe had they fought he would've won.
And I do believe that he would have won had they fought, I never said that I was absolutely positive that he would beat Ali, I just picked him to win.
You're a flip flopping waffler that got stuck with your foot in your mouth...who the hell do you think you're bullshitting here?
Look at you resorting to name calling.LMAO.Sweet Scientist wrote:Grimm wrote:Well might as well educate you in the studies of english as well.Sweet Scientist wrote:
sounds pretty 'definite' to me...![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Definite:2 a : free of all ambiguity, uncertainty, or obscurity .
Definite1 : having distinct or certain limits
Did I say that Wilt Chamberlain would beat I Ali?
NO. I said that I believe had they fought he would've won.
And I do believe that he would have won had they fought, I never said that I was absolutely positive that he would beat Ali, I just picked him to win.
You're a flip flopping waffler that got stuck with your foot in your mouth...who the hell do you think you're bullshitting here?
I did not get caught with my foot in my mouth but it was you who did not know what the word definite means.
Be a man about it, thank me for educating you.
Re: WHAT
Sorry I missed that Grimm I apologise.Grimm wrote:I replied to this Kojoe on the last page.KOJOE90 wrote:Well?KOJOE90 wrote: Have you?
I still cant agree with you, no matter how great an athlete Wilt was you just can't pick up the multitute of skills, mental and physical of a World class Boxer in a few months it takes years and years of coaching and fight experience.No, that's exactly my point, if you have never seen the man fight then how could you automatically say that it is just crazy for someone to say he could beat Ali?
If any of you are actually boxers and not just people who try to assume what it is like being in the ring, then you would know that someone a whole foot taller than you would need very limited boxing skills to give you hell.
I'm not going to go on about everything Wilt Chamberlain could do but he was truly a freak and could do almost anything.
I'm not saying that it was definite that either of them would win, but my bet would be on Chamberlain.
-
Sweet Scientist
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 815
- Joined: 13 Oct 2003, 18:19
You aren't any boxer...and your vile trash you posted about Silkov on another thread (Pm'ing about the size of boxers dick's, calling a faggot bitch) shows your true colors...your credibility level is off the charts...good byeGrimm wrote:Look at you resorting to name calling.LMAO.Sweet Scientist wrote:Grimm wrote: Well might as well educate you in the studies of english as well.
Definite:2 a : free of all ambiguity, uncertainty, or obscurity .
Definite1 : having distinct or certain limits
Did I say that Wilt Chamberlain would beat I Ali?
NO. I said that I believe had they fought he would've won.
And I do believe that he would have won had they fought, I never said that I was absolutely positive that he would beat Ali, I just picked him to win.
You're a flip flopping waffler that got stuck with your foot in your mouth...who the hell do you think you're bullshitting here?
I did not get caught with my foot in my mouth but it was you who did not know what the word definite means.
Be a man about it, thank me for educating you.
I have no problem name calling on a boxing forum.Sweet Scientist wrote:You aren't any boxer...and your vile trash you posted about Silkov on another thread (Pm'ing about the size of boxers dick's, calling a faggot bitch) shows your true colors...your credibility level is off the charts...good byeGrimm wrote:Look at you resorting to name calling.LMAO.Sweet Scientist wrote:
You're a flip flopping waffler that got stuck with your foot in your mouth...who the hell do you think you're bullshitting here?
I did not get caught with my foot in my mouth but it was you who did not know what the word definite means.
Be a man about it, thank me for educating you.
But you of all people to call names, the same person who questioned my class when I called silkov a faggot, you of all people resort to name calling.
Re: WHAT
And I understand your point.KOJOE90 wrote:Sorry I missed that Grimm I apologise.Grimm wrote:I replied to this Kojoe on the last page.KOJOE90 wrote: Well?![]()
I still cant agree with you, no matter how great an athlete Wilt was you just can't pick up the multitute of skills, mental and physical of a World class Boxer in a few months it takes years and years of coaching and fight experience.No, that's exactly my point, if you have never seen the man fight then how could you automatically say that it is just crazy for someone to say he could beat Ali?
If any of you are actually boxers and not just people who try to assume what it is like being in the ring, then you would know that someone a whole foot taller than you would need very limited boxing skills to give you hell.
I'm not going to go on about everything Wilt Chamberlain could do but he was truly a freak and could do almost anything.
I'm not saying that it was definite that either of them would win, but my bet would be on Chamberlain.