Mitchell v Katsidas part 2

wesley05
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Mitchell v Katsidas part 2

Post by wesley05 »

After the performance on sat a would love to see him against katsidas, he seems to be back where he belongs surly this can be arranged ?????? A would to see the rematch
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Mitchell v Katsidas part 2

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

I'd love tae see it but i still think Katsidis would be too much for him.
wesley05
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Mitchell v Katsidas part 2

Post by wesley05 »

ShadrachSimmo wrote:I'd love tae see it but i still think Katsidis would be too much for him.
Even after his last bad bad beating ???
wrimc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 680
Joined: 11 Apr 2010, 14:36

Re: Mitchell v Katsidas part 2

Post by wrimc »

I think even a beaten worn out sliding version of Katsidis beats the best version of Mitchell
wesley05
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Mitchell v Katsidas part 2

Post by wesley05 »

wrimc wrote:I think even a beaten worn out sliding version of Katsidis beats the best version of Mitchell
No way you you must be a Murray fan :roll:
smcb80
Cruiserweight
Posts: 195
Joined: 18 May 2011, 08:27

Re: Mitchell v Katsidas part 2

Post by smcb80 »

would love to see this. if mitchell were to beat katsidis he would propel
hurlock
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5687
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 04:23

Re: Mitchell v Katsidas part 2

Post by hurlock »

katsidis has had the sh1t kicked out of him recently & wont be as tough as the last outing :!:

if rios is getting made it's pointless & if k-mitch wins a title it's a fight that sell's big & he can win.
wrimc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 680
Joined: 11 Apr 2010, 14:36

Re: Mitchell v Katsidas part 2

Post by wrimc »

wesley05 wrote:
wrimc wrote:I think even a beaten worn out sliding version of Katsidis beats the best version of Mitchell
No way you you must be a Murray fan :roll:
Far from it ;;-)
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13318
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: Mitchell v Katsidas part 2

Post by MightyWarrior »

Has Katsidis even got a title ? If not, can't see the point really, as it's a high risk fight for little gain. And Katsidis could well over power Mitchell again, as he's a bit open and Kat is strong as an ox and punches like a mule.

Still, not sure how many more beatings the bloke can take. Tough division as 135. Maybe Rios, sink or swim - be a hell of a fight, and maybe the wily Tibbs and a more exprienced Mitchell, might just come in with the prefect game plan. Big underdog though.
wesley05
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Mitchell v Katsidas part 2

Post by wesley05 »

Revenge my little friend ;;-)
TJ77
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1352
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 13:01

Re: Mitchell v Katsidas part 2

Post by TJ77 »

I think rios first if poss,Katsidis did a right number on him and even if better prepared it could all come flooding back and losing twice to katsidis would un do all his good work far too dangerous to go for that before a world title crack even after the hammering katsidis got at the hands of the ghost but would like to see it one day :TU:
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Mitchell v Katsidas part 2

Post by crusader »

If Katsidis is on the slide then Mitchell would have a good chance. If Katsidis isn't on the slide then it's the same result, although I doubt it comes as early. Katsidis and Murray are on two different levels, and beating Murray doesn't all of a sudden mean you will beat Katsidis. Mitchell will get knocked out if he fights Rios.
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13318
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: Mitchell v Katsidas part 2

Post by MightyWarrior »

wesley05 wrote:Revenge my little friend ;;-)
Well it'd be great, but it's not often a boxer gets revenge after a one sided beating like that.

If your 2nd shot goes wrong, it's a massive disaster. Recently Kermit Clinton tried it, and closer to home Carl Johansson. Must be devastating to the psych. So is it worth the risk? I don't think FW takes it, despite what he says.

Maybe best to just move on, like Khan did.
steve richards
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Mitchell v Katsidas part 2

Post by steve richards »

wrimc wrote:I think even a beaten worn out sliding version of Katsidis beats the best version of Mitchell
I don't think so, Mitchell exposed murray as a head down brawler, he beats katsldis easily next time round, I have followed kevins whole career, he's a class act who f**ked up, fingers crossed he gets his sh1t together a wins himself a title.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Mitchell v Katsidas part 2

Post by crusader »

steve richards wrote:
wrimc wrote:I think even a beaten worn out sliding version of Katsidis beats the best version of Mitchell
I don't think so, Mitchell exposed murray as a head down brawler, he beats katsldis easily next time round, I have followed kevins whole career, he's a class act who f**ked up, fingers crossed he gets his sh1t together a wins himself a title.
What has Mitchell ever done to suggest that he would easily beat Katsidis?
iwz678
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 695
Joined: 20 Jan 2009, 12:30

Re: Mitchell v Katsidas part 2

Post by iwz678 »

Mitchell wouldnt win easy, but Katsidis got beat up by Guerrero and you'd have to think Mitchell would train exceptionally hard for the fight after what happened first time around, and when he does that, look what happens.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Mitchell v Katsidas part 2

Post by leforge »

Mitchell got to get through his court case first!
wrimc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 680
Joined: 11 Apr 2010, 14:36

Re: Mitchell v Katsidas part 2

Post by wrimc »

iwz678 wrote:Mitchell wouldnt win easy, but Katsidis got beat up by Guerrero and you'd have to think Mitchell would train exceptionally hard for the fight after what happened first time around, and when he does that, look what happens.
It will be the same result. Ok he knocked out Murray fair play to the lad its a good win but its still some way off beating Katsidis who lets be honest is still only a contender himself so talk of a world title is a bit premature. Kevin was moving away in wide circles against Murray he wont be able to do that against Katsidis he will cut the ring off and batter him against the ropes. Mitchell doesn't have the power to keep Katsidis off or to trade with him. He will get bullied about again.

Lets not get carried away here guys.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Mitchell v Katsidas part 2

Post by crusader »

iwz678 wrote:Mitchell wouldnt win easy, but Katsidis got beat up by Guerrero and you'd have to think Mitchell would train exceptionally hard for the fight after what happened first time around, and when he does that, look what happens.
Guerrero is better than Mitchell and Katsidis is better than Murray. It's all about levels and this was evident when Katsidis smashed Mtchell in three rounds. I have no doubts that Mitchell could improve on his performance against Katsidis, but people are getting caught up again, just as they were after Mitchell beat Prescott.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Mitchell v Katsidas part 2

Post by crusader »

wrimc wrote:
iwz678 wrote:Mitchell wouldnt win easy, but Katsidis got beat up by Guerrero and you'd have to think Mitchell would train exceptionally hard for the fight after what happened first time around, and when he does that, look what happens.
It will be the same result. Ok he knocked out Murray fair play to the lad its a good win but its still some way off beating Katsidis who lets be honest is still only a contender himself so talk of a world title is a bit premature. Kevin was moving away in wide circles against Murray he wont be able to do that against Katsidis he will cut the ring off and batter him against the ropes. Mitchell doesn't have the power to keep Katsidis off or to trade with him. He will get bullied about again.

Lets not get carried away here guys.
Lol, beat me to it.
yiddo14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Mitchell v Katsidas part 2

Post by yiddo14 »

So essentially you are pinning your hopes of a Mitchell win on Katsidis being worn out and on the slide?

To be honest why would Katsidis want to rematch a fighter he destroyed in 3 rounds? It wasn't exactly a close fight and Mitchell is hardly a big name on the world stage. Katsidis can fight anyone given his pleasing style. Having said that, no doubt the Aussie would be willing to fight him again if the moolah is right.

If Katsidis turns up in shape and hasn't take too many punches then he would win again.

Guerrero did beat him up a bit but then again Guerrero would stand many a fighter on his head ( Mitchell included ) so no shame in that.

The excuses are rolling out for the Katsidis fight but it's tosh. It's all about levels. If Fury batters Chisora this weekend will we all start saying he would beat Haye etc? Of course not. Murray was not and has never been an elite level lightweight ( to be honest Katsidis is not exactly elite either, he loses to the elite guys ). Great a win as it was for Kevin, some perspective is required I reckon.

Mitchell has had his cheerleaders since his early am days so it's not unexpected but I don't think such talk helps him at all. He believed it all before the Katsidis fight and thats why I think that defeat hurt him so much.
iwz678
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 695
Joined: 20 Jan 2009, 12:30

Re: Mitchell v Katsidas part 2

Post by iwz678 »

yiddo14 wrote:So essentially you are pinning your hopes of a Mitchell win on Katsidis being worn out and on the slide?

To be honest why would Katsidis want to rematch a fighter he destroyed in 3 rounds? It wasn't exactly a close fight and Mitchell is hardly a big name on the world stage. Katsidis can fight anyone given his pleasing style. Having said that, no doubt the Aussie would be willing to fight him again if the moolah is right.

If Katsidis turns up in shape and hasn't take too many punches then he would win again.

Guerrero did beat him up a bit but then again Guerrero would stand many a fighter on his head ( Mitchell included ) so no shame in that.

The excuses are rolling out for the Katsidis fight but it's tosh. It's all about levels. If Fury batters Chisora this weekend will we all start saying he would beat Haye etc? Of course not. Murray was not and has never been an elite level lightweight ( to be honest Katsidis is not exactly elite either, he loses to the elite guys ). Great a win as it was for Kevin, some perspective is required I reckon.

Mitchell has had his cheerleaders since his early am days so it's not unexpected but I don't think such talk helps him at all. He believed it all before the Katsidis fight and thats why I think that defeat hurt him so much.
Boxing is about levels yes as someone said, but Boxing is also about timing and Katsidis is on the way down in my opinion/

Why would Katsidis want the fight? Money looks a very good answer for me. He's fighting at home next against a pretty average opponent and who does he have to fight at world level at lighweight, especially if rios goes up to light welter.

Katsidis would see it as a good payday against a guy he's beaten easily and he said he loves England, so I wouldnt rule that out down the line.

I actually think Mitchell will fight an Ignacio Mendoza type fighter next time out.
Grays_Dan
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 203
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 16:49

Re: Mitchell v Katsidas part 2

Post by Grays_Dan »

iwz678 wrote:
I actually think Mitchell will fight an Ignacio Mendoza type fighter next time out.
I hope not - I remember seeing Mitchell make Mendoza bounce off the canvas at Wembley on the back of the Prescott fight would like to think that allegedly delivers on his promise of "World Title shot to the winner"
earsjohn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1691
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 14:34

Re: Mitchell v Katsidas part 2

Post by earsjohn »

MightyWarrior wrote:Has Katsidis even got a title ? If not, can't see the point really, as it's a high risk fight for little gain. And Katsidis could well over power Mitchell again, as he's a bit open and Kat is strong as an ox and punches like a mule.

Still, not sure how many more beatings the bloke can take. Tough division as 135. Maybe Rios, sink or swim - be a hell of a fight, and maybe the wily Tibbs and a more exprienced Mitchell, might just come in with the prefect game plan. Big underdog though.
No offence fella, but it's this attitude that has contributed to the alphabet bodies carving up the titles and Sky having an approach whereby every fight must have a title, however meaningless. A good fight is a good fight, regardless of the belts. Mitchell v Katsidis fills most of the criteria of a good interest generating fight (rematch, both fighters just shy of genuine world class, one fighter looking for redemption, one fighter renowned as a warrior).
Datsue
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Mitchell v Katsidas part 2

Post by Datsue »

I think earsjohn had it right over on the Current Scene -- Marquez's WBO title is being vacated, & Burns is going to have to fight someone tasty if he stays at superfeather.

=

Burns vs Mitchell, vacant WBO Lightweight title, 17/09/11, venue TBA.


Who was it who was saying the other day that the good old (bad old) days of the WBO title being a virtual Commonwealth/European level belt have gone forever?
Post Reply