Thank you Channel 5

Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Thank you Channel 5

Post by Asterix »

Thank you Channel 5, and please may we have Tyson Fury vs David Price in the near future?
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11801
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Ch5 coverage

Post by Old bones Ian »

Now i'm happy that boxing is on CH5, but no undercard fights shown!!

Other than that, the commentary team was good.
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Thank you Channel 5

Post by Asterix »

I thought the production was very good. I hope they keep the same small team.
neil hibbert
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 747
Joined: 21 Dec 2008, 08:36

Re: Thank you Channel 5

Post by neil hibbert »

yed the set up tonight, sky may have a rival, fingers crossed ay :box:
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11801
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Thank you Channel 5

Post by Old bones Ian »

Yeah but they should of shown some highlights of Theopane v Cook at least
Bennyblanco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 967
Joined: 19 Jul 2009, 05:01

Re: Thank you Channel 5

Post by Bennyblanco »

Take note Jim Watt
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Thank you Channel 5

Post by freddydoesdallas »

The intro was nearly 30 mins, that's my only complaint. The rest was alright in my view, practice makes perfect though Desmond!!
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26425
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: Thank you Channel 5

Post by banjo »

Apart from a lack of undercard(though that could have been beyond their control, who knows) I thought it was spot on. Fair play to them and hopefully we'll see a bit more boxing on 5.
Jeff Thomas
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3016
Joined: 30 Apr 2009, 06:32

Re: Thank you Channel 5

Post by Jeff Thomas »

Bennyblanco wrote:Take note Jim Watt
Jim watt is beyond awful- plain annoying
Deno1986
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5349
Joined: 25 Jul 2009, 06:58

Re: Thank you Channel 5

Post by Deno1986 »

Very impressed with all aspects of the production especially the commentary. It's nice to watch a boxing match without having to scream at Jim Watt to shut up.
tijuana1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 263
Joined: 02 May 2009, 10:51

Re: Thank you Channel 5

Post by tijuana1 »

Very pleased to watch boxing back on Ch 5 hope there is many more in the future. :TU:
Deno1986
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5349
Joined: 25 Jul 2009, 06:58

Re: Thank you Channel 5

Post by Deno1986 »

The Dark Destroyer wrote:
Deno1986 wrote:Very impressed with all aspects of the production especially the commentary. It's nice to watch a boxing match without having to scream at Jim Watt to shut up.
Do you get C5 over there? Or did you watch a stream?
Had to Google the frequency and manually tune it into the Skybox.
TheCobra
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3450
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 15:11

Re: Thank you Channel 5

Post by TheCobra »

Deno1986 wrote:Very impressed with all aspects of the production especially the commentary. It's nice to watch a boxing match without having to scream at Jim Watt to shut up.
So, so true. All the Jim Watt apologists, please I hope you watched this fight tonight. It was refreshing I agree that the fight didn't have to centre around one guy's scorecard or views on the fight. I enjoyed it tonight and I think C5 did a great job. I can only hope they get more involved and provide us with a real alternative to Sky.
el_grande_mauro_mina
Lightweight
Posts: 11215
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 11:54

Re: Thank you Channel 5

Post by el_grande_mauro_mina »

I think the vast majority of Tyson Fury's future fights will be on terrrestial as they won't have sky in prison will they?
Deno1986
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5349
Joined: 25 Jul 2009, 06:58

Re: Thank you Channel 5

Post by Deno1986 »

The Dark Destroyer wrote:
Deno1986 wrote:
The Dark Destroyer wrote: Do you get C5 over there? Or did you watch a stream?
Had to Google the frequency and manually tune it into the Skybox.
:lol:

Worth it though?
Yeah, I enjoyed the fight. Standard wasn't the best but exciting all the same.
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26425
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: Thank you Channel 5

Post by banjo »

Fat Git wrote:I think the vast majority of Tyson Fury's future fights will be on terrrestial as they won't have sky in prison will they?
Cuts!

We're all in the same boat 8)
Bennyblanco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 967
Joined: 19 Jul 2009, 05:01

Re: Thank you Channel 5

Post by Bennyblanco »

Fat Git wrote:I think the vast majority of Tyson Fury's future fights will be on terrrestial as they won't have sky in prison will they?

You get all the freeview channels in the slammer these days
AliAsghar
Cruiserweight
Posts: 110
Joined: 31 May 2011, 18:01

Re: Thank you Channel 5

Post by AliAsghar »

Thankyou channel 5 great job shame there was no undressed but still happy to see boxing on terrestrial tv!!
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Thank you Channel 5

Post by freddydoesdallas »

Bennyblanco wrote:
Fat Git wrote:I think the vast majority of Tyson Fury's future fights will be on terrrestial as they won't have sky in prison will they?

You get all the freeview channels in the slammer these days
And the daily mail
mkirkhope
Cruiserweight
Posts: 231
Joined: 19 Sep 2010, 08:20

Re: Thank you Channel 5

Post by mkirkhope »

Bennyblanco wrote:Take note Jim Watt
Watt would have described that as embarrassing for a british title fight - and he'd be right.

It may have been exciting in parts to watch but it was a guy with zero technique vs a guy who was so unfit and uninterested it was dreadful.

As for C5 overall it was a good effort but at least some undercard highlights would have been good.
Bennyblanco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 967
Joined: 19 Jul 2009, 05:01

Re: Thank you Channel 5

Post by Bennyblanco »

freddydoesdallas wrote:
Bennyblanco wrote:
Fat Git wrote:I think the vast majority of Tyson Fury's future fights will be on terrrestial as they won't have sky in prison will they?

You get all the freeview channels in the slammer these days
And the daily mail
:D

You do though, learnt that the hard way :neutral:
wrimc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 680
Joined: 11 Apr 2010, 14:36

Re: Thank you Channel 5

Post by wrimc »

Good show was nice and slick and a god advertisement for the sport. Maybe not necessarily the best boxing on show but it was certainly entertaining! :bow:
split_decision
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 255
Joined: 26 Apr 2005, 16:11

Re: Thank you Channel 5

Post by split_decision »

Add my agreement to this thread. Production was good, Commentary team superb, Bernstein is the man. So good to not have commentators who are in the pocket of the promoter and calling a fight right down the middle. And the fight was a pretty decent, competitive, domestic scrap. Thoroughly enjoyed tonight's show and hopefully a bit of healthy competition may make sky buck up their ideas too.
alexpaterson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4310
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22

Re: Thank you Channel 5

Post by alexpaterson »

Yep excellent production!
lefthook82
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1837
Joined: 07 Mar 2008, 04:33

Re: Thank you Channel 5

Post by lefthook82 »

Better boxing in this UFC match they are showing. Says it all really
Post Reply