Burns v Katsidis!!!
-
goldenears
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 319
- Joined: 21 Jul 2010, 10:49
Burns v Katsidis!!!
Nov 12 in Glasgow apparently! Heck of a fight that for Ricky, Kat's had a few tough wars but still hits hard. Good fight
-
Terminator666
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1665
- Joined: 06 Nov 2007, 10:18
Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!
Can't wait for that one-wonder what Burns will be like at lightweight?
-
billy nelson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1966
- Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49
Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!
Just sit up and take noticeTerminator666 wrote:Can't wait for that one-wonder what Burns will be like at lightweight?
-
ThereByTheGrace
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4016
- Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22
Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!
Kelvin Hall? A bit small is it not - big fight.
Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!
Katsidis fighting for versions of the WBO belt this many times must be some sort of record.
Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!
This time full one not the interim which he has held. What about Mitchell?J-C wrote:Katsidis fighting for versions of the WBO belt this many times must be some sort of record.
Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!
Nice! If this comes off, no bad-mouthing Burns for not fighting Broner. Katsidis is a beast.
Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!
I bet the people who were saying burns was moving up a weight to avoid a tough fighter will be eating humble pie now.
Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!
hmm maybe but then the Ausie has lost a few against good boxers.
I think Broner in the US was waaaaaay more dangerous.
Another smart move by Warren.
I think Broner in the US was waaaaaay more dangerous.
Another smart move by Warren.
Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!
I think way more dangerous is a bit unfair when you take into consideration he's moving up to fight Katsidis's who is now a light welter so will be a very big powerfull Lightweight to be facing.Jon Saxon wrote:hmm maybe but then the Ausie has lost a few against good boxers.
I think Broner in the US was waaaaaay more dangerous.
Another smart move by Warren.
-
JimJim2009
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3131
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48
Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!
Come on Katsidis 
Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!
Main athletics hall holds 4500 for boxingThereByTheGrace wrote:Kelvin Hall? A bit small is it not - big fight.
Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!
Belter of a fight - was massively gutted about Broner but thats well in the past!
A 2 min walk to get the subway to kelvinhall instead of having to wait til 4am to watch a dodgy stream!
Hope this doesn't fall through!
A 2 min walk to get the subway to kelvinhall instead of having to wait til 4am to watch a dodgy stream!
Hope this doesn't fall through!
-
Yes We Can
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 2087
- Joined: 29 Sep 2010, 17:16
Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!
Money fight.
Katsidis sells in the UK. Burns wins then Mitchell/Burns is a huge fight. Burns loses then Katsidis / Mitchell is a massive fight.
doesnt make it a bad fight though....
Katsidis sells in the UK. Burns wins then Mitchell/Burns is a huge fight. Burns loses then Katsidis / Mitchell is a massive fight.
doesnt make it a bad fight though....
Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!
Perhaps I will get more excited later, but at the moment I would much rather see Burns vs Broner.
-
Pat Butcher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 227
- Joined: 06 Jul 2008, 04:40
Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!
Good fight. Can't fault Ricky at all for taking this.
Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!
I bet Hagler will be all over this one.
"wheel barrows at the ready"
"wheel barrows at the ready"
Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!
Tough tough fight but if Burns avoids a tear up theres no reason why he can't box the skull off Katsidis
Ragin that I'm gonna be on holiday that date tho, move it back a week!!!
Ragin that I'm gonna be on holiday that date tho, move it back a week!!!
Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!
Get the following on to
Scott Harrison
Alex Arthur
Kevin Mcintyre
Christ its like the gold old days
Scott Harrison
Alex Arthur
Kevin Mcintyre
Christ its like the gold old days
-
loaded_gloves
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 1907
- Joined: 09 Mar 2011, 12:18
Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!
He just getting KOd for more money. He had no shot at winning either.Asterix wrote:Nice! If this comes off, no bad-mouthing Burns for not fighting Broner. Katsidis is a beast.
Ballsy for any man to get into the ring with either though, we must all admit.
-
ShadrachSimmo
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4738
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42
Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!
Nice match up. If Burns avoids mixing it up he should outbox him. But Katsidis will be on him for 12 rounds.
-
Twinkle Toes
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3344
- Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 08:38
Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!
Kastidis must be shop worn now, he's been in some epic fights and took some serious punishment, looks like perfect timing to me.
Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!
Guerrero and Marquez were wars. But then so were his fights with Amonsot, Casamayor and Diaz all of which were before he flattened Mitchell. There's not guarantee he will be too shop worn for Burns.Twinkle Toes wrote:Kastidis must be shop worn now, he's been in some epic fights and took some serious punishment, looks like perfect timing to me.