Burns v Katsidis!!!

goldenears
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 319
Joined: 21 Jul 2010, 10:49

Burns v Katsidis!!!

Post by goldenears »

Nov 12 in Glasgow apparently! Heck of a fight that for Ricky, Kat's had a few tough wars but still hits hard. Good fight
Josh1111
Cruiserweight
Posts: 874
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 05:50

Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!

Post by Josh1111 »

Link?
Terminator666
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1665
Joined: 06 Nov 2007, 10:18

Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!

Post by Terminator666 »

Can't wait for that one-wonder what Burns will be like at lightweight?
billy nelson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1966
Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49

Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!

Post by billy nelson »

Terminator666 wrote:Can't wait for that one-wonder what Burns will be like at lightweight?
Just sit up and take notice
ThereByTheGrace
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4016
Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22

Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!

Post by ThereByTheGrace »

Kelvin Hall? A bit small is it not - big fight.
JC
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4579
Joined: 07 Jan 2004, 13:04

Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!

Post by JC »

Katsidis fighting for versions of the WBO belt this many times must be some sort of record.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!

Post by leforge »

J-C wrote:Katsidis fighting for versions of the WBO belt this many times must be some sort of record.
This time full one not the interim which he has held. What about Mitchell?
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!

Post by Asterix »

Nice! If this comes off, no bad-mouthing Burns for not fighting Broner. Katsidis is a beast.
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!

Post by Finn »

I bet the people who were saying burns was moving up a weight to avoid a tough fighter will be eating humble pie now.
Jon Saxon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1657
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 16:16

Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!

Post by Jon Saxon »

hmm maybe but then the Ausie has lost a few against good boxers.
I think Broner in the US was waaaaaay more dangerous.

Another smart move by Warren.
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!

Post by Finn »

Jon Saxon wrote:hmm maybe but then the Ausie has lost a few against good boxers.
I think Broner in the US was waaaaaay more dangerous.

Another smart move by Warren.
I think way more dangerous is a bit unfair when you take into consideration he's moving up to fight Katsidis's who is now a light welter so will be a very big powerfull Lightweight to be facing.
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!

Post by JimJim2009 »

Come on Katsidis :TU:
sgtcecil
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 979
Joined: 20 Jan 2009, 14:38

Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!

Post by sgtcecil »

ThereByTheGrace wrote:Kelvin Hall? A bit small is it not - big fight.
Main athletics hall holds 4500 for boxing
sgtcecil
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 979
Joined: 20 Jan 2009, 14:38

Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!

Post by sgtcecil »

Belter of a fight - was massively gutted about Broner but thats well in the past!

A 2 min walk to get the subway to kelvinhall instead of having to wait til 4am to watch a dodgy stream!

Hope this doesn't fall through!
Yes We Can
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2087
Joined: 29 Sep 2010, 17:16

Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!

Post by Yes We Can »

Money fight.

Katsidis sells in the UK. Burns wins then Mitchell/Burns is a huge fight. Burns loses then Katsidis / Mitchell is a massive fight.

doesnt make it a bad fight though....
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!

Post by Horse »

Perhaps I will get more excited later, but at the moment I would much rather see Burns vs Broner.
Pat Butcher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 227
Joined: 06 Jul 2008, 04:40

Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!

Post by Pat Butcher »

Good fight. Can't fault Ricky at all for taking this.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!

Post by whiskey »

I bet Hagler will be all over this one.

"wheel barrows at the ready"
Emmseegee
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1400
Joined: 10 Sep 2010, 10:29

Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!

Post by Emmseegee »

Tough tough fight but if Burns avoids a tear up theres no reason why he can't box the skull off Katsidis
Ragin that I'm gonna be on holiday that date tho, move it back a week!!! :TU:
Gazmac81
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2103
Joined: 04 Oct 2008, 10:06

Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!

Post by Gazmac81 »

Get the following on to

Scott Harrison
Alex Arthur
Kevin Mcintyre

Christ its like the gold old days :bag:
loaded_gloves
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1907
Joined: 09 Mar 2011, 12:18

Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!

Post by loaded_gloves »

Asterix wrote:Nice! If this comes off, no bad-mouthing Burns for not fighting Broner. Katsidis is a beast.
He just getting KOd for more money. He had no shot at winning either.

Ballsy for any man to get into the ring with either though, we must all admit.
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

Nice match up. If Burns avoids mixing it up he should outbox him. But Katsidis will be on him for 12 rounds.
Twinkle Toes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3344
Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 08:38

Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!

Post by Twinkle Toes »

Kastidis must be shop worn now, he's been in some epic fights and took some serious punishment, looks like perfect timing to me.
JC
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4579
Joined: 07 Jan 2004, 13:04

Re: Burns v Katsidis!!!

Post by JC »

Twinkle Toes wrote:Kastidis must be shop worn now, he's been in some epic fights and took some serious punishment, looks like perfect timing to me.
Guerrero and Marquez were wars. But then so were his fights with Amonsot, Casamayor and Diaz all of which were before he flattened Mitchell. There's not guarantee he will be too shop worn for Burns.
Post Reply