Katsidis vs Burns WBO Lightweight Title

Post Reply
franko1990
Cruiserweight
Posts: 88
Joined: 10 Oct 2010, 07:58

Katsidis vs Burns WBO Lightweight Title

Post by franko1990 »

Apparently it's on for the WBO Lightweight Title. Good fight for Katsidis I reckon, but what's happened to the Light Welter ambitions?
http://sport.stv.tv/world-sport/270099- ... -katsidis/
Last edited by franko1990 on 14 Sep 2011, 17:42, edited 1 time in total.
#1 BoXa
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 216
Joined: 05 Aug 2011, 10:58

Re: Katsidis vs Burns?

Post by #1 BoXa »

GO KATSIDIS U BEAST GOODLUCK CHAMP :TU:
Da Voice
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1092
Joined: 24 Dec 2010, 20:59

Re: Katsidis vs Burns?

Post by Da Voice »

franko1990 wrote:Apparently it's on for the WBO Lightweight Title. Good fight for Katsidis I reckon, but what's happened to the Light Welter ambitions?
http://sport.stv.tv/world-sport/270099- ... -katsidis/
IMO.........Bullshit
thunderfromdownunder
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1789
Joined: 15 May 2005, 06:55

Re: Katsidis vs Burns WBO Lightweight Title

Post by thunderfromdownunder »

this is a great fight for katsidis. I guess marquez must have vacated the title.
Brute
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6993
Joined: 03 Dec 2005, 03:05

Re: Katsidis vs Burns WBO Lightweight Title

Post by Brute »

If this is kosher it is probably a matter of a title being available.

Good luck, Michael. :TU:
Da Voice
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1092
Joined: 24 Dec 2010, 20:59

Re: Katsidis vs Burns WBO Lightweight Title

Post by Da Voice »

thunderfromdownunder wrote:this is a great fight for katsidis. I guess marquez must have vacated the title.
Elevated to "super champ"
PacSugarThunder
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 40
Joined: 05 Oct 2009, 19:43

Re: Katsidis vs Burns WBO Lightweight Title

Post by PacSugarThunder »

Da Voice wrote:
thunderfromdownunder wrote:this is a great fight for katsidis. I guess marquez must have vacated the title.
Elevated to "super champ"
He's been 'Super Champ' for ages. It's actually got to do with the fact that JMM has/is vacating to head to 147lbs and contest for Pacquiao's WBO 147lbs belt when they meet in November.
thunderfromdownunder
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1789
Joined: 15 May 2005, 06:55

Re: Katsidis vs Burns WBO Lightweight Title

Post by thunderfromdownunder »

Da Voice wrote:
thunderfromdownunder wrote:this is a great fight for katsidis. I guess marquez must have vacated the title.
Elevated to "super champ"
i dont think the wbo has super champs
p4p1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5854
Joined: 23 Apr 2007, 07:43

Re: Katsidis vs Burns WBO Lightweight Title

Post by p4p1 »

WBO has a super champion but it's not like WBA's they dnt hand out another title and it's early after 12 consecutive defences I'm pretty sure
franko1990
Cruiserweight
Posts: 88
Joined: 10 Oct 2010, 07:58

Re: Katsidis vs Burns WBO Lightweight Title

Post by franko1990 »

thunderfromdownunder wrote:this is a great fight for katsidis. I guess marquez must have vacated the title.
Don't get me wrong I'm a massive Katsidis fan but how does he get to fight for the Vacant title ahead of Robert Guerrero who is the interim title holder?
D J Pawsey
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 207
Joined: 18 Jul 2011, 05:26

Re: Katsidis vs Burns WBO Lightweight Title

Post by D J Pawsey »

franko1990 wrote:
thunderfromdownunder wrote:this is a great fight for katsidis. I guess marquez must have vacated the title.
Don't get me wrong I'm a massive Katsidis fan but how does he get to fight for the Vacant title ahead of Robert Guerrero who is the interim title holder?
allegedly Promotions has plenty of pull with WBO Look how many Wbo champs they have promoted.
Ipswich Express
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 145
Joined: 11 Jul 2011, 09:10

Re: Katsidis vs Burns WBO Lightweight Title

Post by Ipswich Express »

Guerrero has moved up to 140.
thunderfromdownunder
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1789
Joined: 15 May 2005, 06:55

Re: Katsidis vs Burns WBO Lightweight Title

Post by thunderfromdownunder »

is it for the full title or the interim one?
Brute
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6993
Joined: 03 Dec 2005, 03:05

Re: Katsidis vs Burns WBO Lightweight Title

Post by Brute »

thunderfromdownunder wrote:is it for the full title or the interim one?
Interim, naturally. WBO is run by indecisive clowns.
Craig14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2933
Joined: 17 Jun 2010, 12:25

Re: Katsidis vs Burns WBO Lightweight Title

Post by Craig14 »

Burns is Wbo super featherweight World champion. I doubt very much it's for the interim. at lightweight.
Brute
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6993
Joined: 03 Dec 2005, 03:05

Re: Katsidis vs Burns WBO Lightweight Title

Post by Brute »

"Interim" is how it is described on the schedule.
Craig14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2933
Joined: 17 Jun 2010, 12:25

Re: Katsidis vs Burns WBO Lightweight Title

Post by Craig14 »

Brute wrote:"Interim" is how it is described on the schedule.
Yep it is for the interim title very strange. Giving up a world title (all be it a WBO one) and moving up to fight a big puncher in Katsidis who weighed 140 ponds for his last fight. Really can't understand it Burns is not even a big puncher. I think Katsidis will walk straight through him.
Brute
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6993
Joined: 03 Dec 2005, 03:05

Re: Katsidis vs Burns WBO Lightweight Title

Post by Brute »

In 2006 WBO Lightweight Champion Acelino Freitas announced his retirement. The WBO contacted Michael Katsidis and had him abandon two upcoming fights to fight Graham Earl for the vacant title.

Freitas then changed his mind and announced he would fight Juan Diaz to combine his WBO title and Diaz's WBA title. The WBO panicked. Fearing being sued by Katsidis for loss of earnings and unwilling to cast Freitas aside (he lost to Diaz anyway) they decided to have two champions, one champion and one interim champion.

They have been gun shy about their lightweight title ever since.
Post Reply