Katsidis vs Burns WBO Lightweight Title
-
franko1990
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 88
- Joined: 10 Oct 2010, 07:58
Katsidis vs Burns WBO Lightweight Title
Apparently it's on for the WBO Lightweight Title. Good fight for Katsidis I reckon, but what's happened to the Light Welter ambitions?
http://sport.stv.tv/world-sport/270099- ... -katsidis/
http://sport.stv.tv/world-sport/270099- ... -katsidis/
Last edited by franko1990 on 14 Sep 2011, 17:42, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Katsidis vs Burns?
GO KATSIDIS U BEAST GOODLUCK CHAMP 
Re: Katsidis vs Burns?
IMO.........Bullshitfranko1990 wrote:Apparently it's on for the WBO Lightweight Title. Good fight for Katsidis I reckon, but what's happened to the Light Welter ambitions?
http://sport.stv.tv/world-sport/270099- ... -katsidis/
-
thunderfromdownunder
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1789
- Joined: 15 May 2005, 06:55
Re: Katsidis vs Burns WBO Lightweight Title
this is a great fight for katsidis. I guess marquez must have vacated the title.
Re: Katsidis vs Burns WBO Lightweight Title
If this is kosher it is probably a matter of a title being available.
Good luck, Michael.
Good luck, Michael.
Re: Katsidis vs Burns WBO Lightweight Title
Elevated to "super champ"thunderfromdownunder wrote:this is a great fight for katsidis. I guess marquez must have vacated the title.
-
PacSugarThunder
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 40
- Joined: 05 Oct 2009, 19:43
Re: Katsidis vs Burns WBO Lightweight Title
He's been 'Super Champ' for ages. It's actually got to do with the fact that JMM has/is vacating to head to 147lbs and contest for Pacquiao's WBO 147lbs belt when they meet in November.Da Voice wrote:Elevated to "super champ"thunderfromdownunder wrote:this is a great fight for katsidis. I guess marquez must have vacated the title.
-
thunderfromdownunder
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1789
- Joined: 15 May 2005, 06:55
Re: Katsidis vs Burns WBO Lightweight Title
i dont think the wbo has super champsDa Voice wrote:Elevated to "super champ"thunderfromdownunder wrote:this is a great fight for katsidis. I guess marquez must have vacated the title.
Re: Katsidis vs Burns WBO Lightweight Title
WBO has a super champion but it's not like WBA's they dnt hand out another title and it's early after 12 consecutive defences I'm pretty sure
-
franko1990
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 88
- Joined: 10 Oct 2010, 07:58
Re: Katsidis vs Burns WBO Lightweight Title
Don't get me wrong I'm a massive Katsidis fan but how does he get to fight for the Vacant title ahead of Robert Guerrero who is the interim title holder?thunderfromdownunder wrote:this is a great fight for katsidis. I guess marquez must have vacated the title.
-
D J Pawsey
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 207
- Joined: 18 Jul 2011, 05:26
Re: Katsidis vs Burns WBO Lightweight Title
allegedly Promotions has plenty of pull with WBO Look how many Wbo champs they have promoted.franko1990 wrote:Don't get me wrong I'm a massive Katsidis fan but how does he get to fight for the Vacant title ahead of Robert Guerrero who is the interim title holder?thunderfromdownunder wrote:this is a great fight for katsidis. I guess marquez must have vacated the title.
-
Ipswich Express
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 145
- Joined: 11 Jul 2011, 09:10
Re: Katsidis vs Burns WBO Lightweight Title
Guerrero has moved up to 140.
-
thunderfromdownunder
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1789
- Joined: 15 May 2005, 06:55
Re: Katsidis vs Burns WBO Lightweight Title
is it for the full title or the interim one?
Re: Katsidis vs Burns WBO Lightweight Title
Interim, naturally. WBO is run by indecisive clowns.thunderfromdownunder wrote:is it for the full title or the interim one?
Re: Katsidis vs Burns WBO Lightweight Title
Burns is Wbo super featherweight World champion. I doubt very much it's for the interim. at lightweight.
Re: Katsidis vs Burns WBO Lightweight Title
"Interim" is how it is described on the schedule.
Re: Katsidis vs Burns WBO Lightweight Title
Yep it is for the interim title very strange. Giving up a world title (all be it a WBO one) and moving up to fight a big puncher in Katsidis who weighed 140 ponds for his last fight. Really can't understand it Burns is not even a big puncher. I think Katsidis will walk straight through him.Brute wrote:"Interim" is how it is described on the schedule.
Re: Katsidis vs Burns WBO Lightweight Title
In 2006 WBO Lightweight Champion Acelino Freitas announced his retirement. The WBO contacted Michael Katsidis and had him abandon two upcoming fights to fight Graham Earl for the vacant title.
Freitas then changed his mind and announced he would fight Juan Diaz to combine his WBO title and Diaz's WBA title. The WBO panicked. Fearing being sued by Katsidis for loss of earnings and unwilling to cast Freitas aside (he lost to Diaz anyway) they decided to have two champions, one champion and one interim champion.
They have been gun shy about their lightweight title ever since.
Freitas then changed his mind and announced he would fight Juan Diaz to combine his WBO title and Diaz's WBA title. The WBO panicked. Fearing being sued by Katsidis for loss of earnings and unwilling to cast Freitas aside (he lost to Diaz anyway) they decided to have two champions, one champion and one interim champion.
They have been gun shy about their lightweight title ever since.