tonights R by R

Baboon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1185
Joined: 25 Feb 2008, 17:00

Re: tonights R by R

Post by Baboon »

J-C wrote:I need this one to go to the 10th. Hoping the ref doesn't step in early.
talk about tempting fate :wink: . That was shockingly premature.
Speed997
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 30
Joined: 02 Oct 2011, 14:49

Re: tonights R by R

Post by Speed997 »

British stoppage....again.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17105
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: tonights R by R

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Old bones Ian wrote:
punchers chance wrote:eddie hearn is a genius to have sold out the venue on the strength of this fight. Its a dire one sided contest. Brook coasting through 4
Not Eddies fault, Jackiewicz has been competitive against a title holder. The promoters job is to get his fighter the highest pay/ranking with the least risk.
I agree Ian. The guy's ranked and has never been stopped. Awesome performance by Kell.
alexpaterson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4310
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 11:22

Re: tonights R by R

Post by alexpaterson »

Very premature stoppage, but there was only one way that was going!! Brook's totally changed my opinion of him tonight he really did look world class, very impressive performance
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: tonights R by R

Post by crusader »

RJ was clearly defending himselff. Most of those shots were not landing.
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11808
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: tonights R by R

Post by Old bones Ian »

I would like to point out that my Boxing Monthly to discuss thing was 'Are fights stopped in the UK to soon?'
JC
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4579
Joined: 07 Jan 2004, 13:04

Re: tonights R by R

Post by JC »

steve689 wrote:
J-C wrote:I need this one to go to the 10th. Hoping the ref doesn't step in early.
You cynic...oh wait a minute :roll:
Depressing.
wesley05
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: tonights R by R

Post by wesley05 »

WORLD CLASS :bow: viv
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: tonights R by R

Post by crusader »

Howard 'Quick Trigger' Foster
Ketchel
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 868
Joined: 17 Nov 2008, 14:18

Re: tonights R by R

Post by Ketchel »

Special K was just that tonight but that was stopped way too early!!
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11808
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: tonights R by R

Post by Old bones Ian »

crusader wrote:Howard 'Quick Trigger' Foster
unless its a british boxer that has taken a few heavy shots
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17105
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: tonights R by R

Post by keithmoonhangover »

AT the end of the day, the other guy barely landed a punch. How many more punches do you lot want him to take? Do you always want to see someone on the floor in the recovery position?
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: tonights R by R

Post by crusader »

The key not to be stopped when Foster is the ref

1. Be British
2. Don't cover up for more than 5 seconds
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: tonights R by R

Post by crusader »

keithmoonhangover wrote:AT the end of the day, the other guy barely landed a punch. How many more punches do you lot want him to take? Do you always want to see someone on the floor in the recovery position?
RJ was absolutely fine. He was clear headed, steady legged, and he was blocking most of Brook's fflurrys. He showed no signs of being in serious danger.
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11808
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: tonights R by R

Post by Old bones Ian »

keithmoonhangover wrote:AT the end of the day, the other guy barely landed a punch. How many more punches do you lot want him to take? Do you always want to see someone on the floor in the recovery position?
No, but Jackiewicz is a proven euro level fighter, so to stop him without the guy wobbling isn't correct.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17105
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: tonights R by R

Post by keithmoonhangover »

crusader wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:AT the end of the day, the other guy barely landed a punch. How many more punches do you lot want him to take? Do you always want to see someone on the floor in the recovery position?
RJ was absolutely fine. He was clear headed, steady legged, and he was blocking most of Brook's fflurrys. He showed no signs of being in serious danger.
He was never in the fight and was totally outclassed.
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9661
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Re: tonights R by R

Post by steve689 »

I think the fact that Sky are only showing repeated replays of a single slow motion right hand landed sums up that it was premature.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: tonights R by R

Post by crusader »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
crusader wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:AT the end of the day, the other guy barely landed a punch. How many more punches do you lot want him to take? Do you always want to see someone on the floor in the recovery position?
RJ was absolutely fine. He was clear headed, steady legged, and he was blocking most of Brook's fflurrys. He showed no signs of being in serious danger.
He was never in the fight and was totally outclassed.
So should every one-sided fight be stopped in your opinion? Even when the losing fighter has shown NO signs of being in any sort of trouble?
JC
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4579
Joined: 07 Jan 2004, 13:04

Re: tonights R by R

Post by JC »

crusader wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:AT the end of the day, the other guy barely landed a punch. How many more punches do you lot want him to take? Do you always want to see someone on the floor in the recovery position?
RJ was absolutely fine. He was clear headed, steady legged, and he was blocking most of Brook's fflurrys. He showed no signs of being in serious danger.
Exactly(leaving aside my own bitterness at losing money) there's no rule that says you stop a fight if it's boring.
Speed997
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 30
Joined: 02 Oct 2011, 14:49

Re: tonights R by R

Post by Speed997 »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
crusader wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:AT the end of the day, the other guy barely landed a punch. How many more punches do you lot want him to take? Do you always want to see someone on the floor in the recovery position?
RJ was absolutely fine. He was clear headed, steady legged, and he was blocking most of Brook's fflurrys. He showed no signs of being in serious danger.
He was never in the fight and was totally outclassed.

Then let him lose a UD unless he is stopped.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17105
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: tonights R by R

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Old bones Ian wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:AT the end of the day, the other guy barely landed a punch. How many more punches do you lot want him to take? Do you always want to see someone on the floor in the recovery position?
No, but Jackiewicz is a proven euro level fighter, so to stop him without the guy wobbling isn't correct.
If someone is shipping unanswered punches (yes he blocked some, but didn't return any) then the ref is right to stop it.
exittored
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1565
Joined: 19 Apr 2008, 19:40

Re: tonights R by R

Post by exittored »

THAT WAS A DISGUSTING STOPPAGE!
Last edited by exittored on 08 Oct 2011, 17:05, edited 2 times in total.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: tonights R by R

Post by crusader »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
Old bones Ian wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:AT the end of the day, the other guy barely landed a punch. How many more punches do you lot want him to take? Do you always want to see someone on the floor in the recovery position?
No, but Jackiewicz is a proven euro level fighter, so to stop him without the guy wobbling isn't correct.
If someone is shipping unanswered punches (yes he blocked some, but didn't return any) then the ref is right to stop it.
If someone is blocking most of those punches and is not hurt then a stoppage is not warranted.
Last edited by crusader on 08 Oct 2011, 17:01, edited 1 time in total.
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11808
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: tonights R by R

Post by Old bones Ian »

Your talking about 2 world class boxers, and don't come higher than you bullsh*t. Boxing is about hurting and KOing your opponent, if it was a 6 round prelim i could understand the ref stopping it. But this was 2 very experienced boxers who train and expect to be pushed to the limit. Early stoppage no doubt
Speed997
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 30
Joined: 02 Oct 2011, 14:49

Re: tonights R by R

Post by Speed997 »

THIS WAS NOT A JOURNEYMAN OPPONENT!

KELL DID WELL BUT IT WAS A NBAD STOPPAGE.

WAS FELIX TRINIDAD PULLED UT AGAINST WINKY WRIGHT? HE LOST EVERY DAMN ROUND!
Post Reply