Buncey's Back!
Re: Buncey's Back!
Will Bunce be given a free reign ala Setanta to his express his views, or will he be fed lines from Frank?
Once the show gets going after a few weeks, will it feature non-Frank boxers?
Great to see Buncey back!
Once the show gets going after a few weeks, will it feature non-Frank boxers?
Great to see Buncey back!
Re: Buncey's Back!
This is great, it was brilliant in the days of Setanta, very entertaining, informative and a bit of craziness in there too. One of the smartest moves allegedly did was to restore the Bunce Boxing Hour 
Re: Buncey's Back!
I reached out for a big Sky fighter but was told: No way!
I will mention ALL fighters and fights. Don't expect me to give out Primetime's subscription details!
Adios and thanks.
I will mention ALL fighters and fights. Don't expect me to give out Primetime's subscription details!
Adios and thanks.
-
Tommy Gunn13
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3290
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11
Re: Buncey's Back!
Is this avalible online??
Re: Buncey's Back!
allegedly wrote:Hi all,
Steve Bunce's hugely popular Boxing Hour makes it long awaited return to UK television screens' tomorrow night (Monday 17th October) at 8pm, LIVE and exclusive on allegedly (Sky Platform Ch. 456).
The boxing fans' favourite show returns with a mix of guests, interviews, news, exclusives, highlights and of course plenty of controversy on the UK's first and only dedicated fight channel.
Planned for Buncey's first show back are: super-heavyweight sensation Anthony Joshua who won silver at the World Amateur Championships; Britain's only ever World Amateur Champion Frankie Gavin to cast his verdict on the record medal haul by Team GB in Azerbaijan; East End favourite Johnny Greaves and bitter rivals Nathan Cleverly and Tony Bellew join in on the phone ahead of their big fight on Saturday night in Liverpool.
Make sure you tune in to allegedly tomorrow night from 8pm for Bunce's Boxing Hour.
Please just make sure this program is about boxing and not Bunce. Please!
Re: Buncey's Back!
Davey,
I will do my best, but you know what he is like.
Adios.
I will do my best, but you know what he is like.
Adios.
Re: Buncey's Back!
I'm glad to see it back!
They must have saw my post!!
They must have saw my post!!
-
Twinkle Toes
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3344
- Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 08:38
Re: Buncey's Back!
Can't see this being anything more than an advert for allegedly and its fighters.
Re: Buncey's Back!
Confusedallegedly wrote:Hi all,Steve Bunce's hugely popular Boxing Hour makes it long awaited return to UK television screens' tomorrow night (Monday 17th October) at 8pm, LIVE and exclusive on allegedly (Sky Platform Ch. 456).
Re: Buncey's Back!
Buncey wrote:Davey,
I will do my best, but you know what he is like.
Adios.
Aye he is mental!
Re: Buncey's Back!
I suspect he is well paid to act that part.DaveBoyMorrison wrote:Buncey wrote:Davey,
I will do my best, but you know what he is like.
Adios.
Aye he is mental!
I wonder if the gurning is natural or just done for dramatic effect.
Ah, good old Big Daddy Bunce; he's great for a laugh.
Re: Buncey's Back!
Giancarlo wrote:I suspect he is well paid to act that part.DaveBoyMorrison wrote:Buncey wrote:Davey,
I will do my best, but you know what he is like.
Adios.
Aye he is mental!
I wonder if the gurning is natural or just done for dramatic effect.
Ah, good old Big Daddy Bunce; he's great for a laugh.
I think the gurning is caused by jellied eels. I had to stop watching when he was on Setanta as he kept calling grown men "boy" and sparring with non existent opponents.
-
MightyWarrior
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13319
- Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01
Re: Buncey's Back!
Are you sure it wasn't FW who said No Way ?BIGMARK wrote:Wow, that is a bit petty from Sky and also a little surprising seeing that Frank still has an existing contract with them. I said on another thread I wouldnt be surprised if Sky were behind allegedly in a silent partner type way. I say this as I was surprised they had Bellew in the studio on the recent bill from Liverpool when they surely knew his fight with Cleverley wasn't going to be on their channel.Buncey wrote:I reached out for a big Sky fighter but was told: No way!
I will mention ALL fighters and fights. Don't expect me to give out Primetime's subscription details!
Adios and thanks.
Re: Buncey's Back!
Nice one, looking forward to itallegedly wrote:Sorry, getting ahead of the schedules! It should be Monday 10th October.
J-C wrote:Confusedallegedly wrote:Hi all,Steve Bunce's hugely popular Boxing Hour makes it long awaited return to UK television screens' tomorrow night (Monday 17th October) at 8pm, LIVE and exclusive on allegedly (Sky Platform Ch. 456).
-
Glyn Leach
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2135
- Joined: 25 Dec 2007, 14:08
Re: Buncey's Back!
No no no, that helps no one. All the Promoters and TV boss bang on about trying to build boxing but then we get this, the same old degeneration into factions and alliances. Really disappointing. In truth I'm not surprised by this pettiness, but I am disappointed.Buncey wrote:I reached out for a big Sky fighter but was told: No way!
Adios and thanks.
Re: Buncey's Back!
Told no way by who Steve? allegedly? Sky? The fighters manager? The fighter himself? Its a little bit cryptic there.
Re: Buncey's Back!
It's not a allegedly problem, let's leave it at that.
My policy on this show will be to have fighters from all promoters and TV networks. That's a fact.
Adios.
My policy on this show will be to have fighters from all promoters and TV networks. That's a fact.
Adios.
Re: Buncey's Back!
You're kidding me, right Mark?BIGMARK wrote:Wow, that is a bit petty from Sky and also a little surprising seeing that Frank still has an existing contract with them.Buncey wrote:I reached out for a big Sky fighter but was told: No way!
I will mention ALL fighters and fights. Don't expect me to give out Primetime's subscription details!
Adios and thanks.
Man with contract at one TV channel helps set up another and you want the first one to HELP him?
-
DavidPayne
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6248
- Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00
Re: Buncey's Back!
A maths question for you what is four fifths of fornicate all?
For those who wanted more competition in the coverage of the sport.
Be careful what you wish for.
For those who wanted more competition in the coverage of the sport.
Be careful what you wish for.
Re: Buncey's Back!
I totally agree.DavidPayne wrote:A maths question for you what is four fifths of eff all?
For those who wanted more competition in the coverage of the sport.
Be careful what you wish for.
As I've mentioned on here before, more competition in the football Premiership market made it nearly twice as expensive to watch the Premiership.
-
Glyn Leach
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2135
- Joined: 25 Dec 2007, 14:08
Re: Buncey's Back!
Competition is healthy as long as the competitors aren't so childish as to factionalise and politicise it. It should be used as a spur to raise their own game rather than damage the larger whole and end of with the four fifths of fornicate all scenario. Schoolboy behaviour. Don't worry about the opposition, be confident in yourself - and if you can't be, ask yourself why and then try to put it right.DavidPayne wrote:A maths question for you what is four fifths of eff all?
For those who wanted more competition in the coverage of the sport.
Be careful what you wish for.
Re: Buncey's Back!
A monopoly is good if it means you get to see all the fights on one channel rather than bidding wars and fights being split between 3/4 channels that you have to pay for separately though.Glyn Leach wrote:Competition is healthy as long as the competitors aren't so childish as to factionalise and politicise it. It should be used as a spur to raise their own game rather than damage the larger whole and end of with the four fifths of eff all scenario. Schoolboy behaviour. Don't worry about the opposition, be confident in yourself - and if you can't be, ask yourself why and then try to put it right.DavidPayne wrote:A maths question for you what is four fifths of eff all?
For those who wanted more competition in the coverage of the sport.
Be careful what you wish for.
-
MightyWarrior
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13319
- Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01
Re: Buncey's Back!
Not neccesarily. When Sky were the only game in town, they could completely ignore a big Roy Jones fight, and pretend he didn't even exist. And decide not to show a fight as big as Trinidad/Hopkins, leaving us the viewers with no alternative channel to watch it on.Scottrf wrote:A monopoly is good if it means you get to see all the fights on one channel rather than bidding wars and fights being split between 3/4 channels that you have to pay for separately though.
At least now Primetime et al are picking up the slack.
And FW and Sky are as bad as each other when it comes to a childish and spiteful attitude towards the competition.
Re: Buncey's Back!
Those examples are from a decade ago. At the start of this year they were looking like picking up every domestic fight and a good number of foreign ones. Now you have to subcribe to Box ntion and pay for a Primetime fight every couple of months to watch a similar number of fights. I don't think either have yet showed a fight Sky wouldn't have otherwise.MightyWarrior wrote:Not neccesarily. When Sky were the only game in town, they could completely ignore a big Roy Jones fight, and pretend he didn't even exist. And decide not to show a fight as big as Trinidad/Hopkins, leaving us the viewers with no alternative channel to watch it on.Scottrf wrote:A monopoly is good if it means you get to see all the fights on one channel rather than bidding wars and fights being split between 3/4 channels that you have to pay for separately though.
At least now Primetime et al are picking up the slack.
And FW and Sky are as bad as each other when it comes to the competition.
