Buncey's Back!

Finch
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1129
Joined: 01 Mar 2008, 08:14

Re: Buncey's Back!

Post by Finch »

Will Bunce be given a free reign ala Setanta to his express his views, or will he be fed lines from Frank?

Once the show gets going after a few weeks, will it feature non-Frank boxers?

Great to see Buncey back!
gasman
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 740
Joined: 20 May 2009, 10:59

Re: Buncey's Back!

Post by gasman »

This is great, it was brilliant in the days of Setanta, very entertaining, informative and a bit of craziness in there too. One of the smartest moves allegedly did was to restore the Bunce Boxing Hour :TU:
Buncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 405
Joined: 24 Feb 2009, 07:44

Re: Buncey's Back!

Post by Buncey »

I reached out for a big Sky fighter but was told: No way!
I will mention ALL fighters and fights. Don't expect me to give out Primetime's subscription details!

Adios and thanks.
Tommy Gunn13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3290
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11

Re: Buncey's Back!

Post by Tommy Gunn13 »

Is this avalible online??
Tomasino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7876
Joined: 24 Apr 2010, 16:39

Re: Buncey's Back!

Post by Tomasino »

allegedly wrote:Hi all,

Steve Bunce's hugely popular Boxing Hour makes it long awaited return to UK television screens' tomorrow night (Monday 17th October) at 8pm, LIVE and exclusive on allegedly (Sky Platform Ch. 456).

The boxing fans' favourite show returns with a mix of guests, interviews, news, exclusives, highlights and of course plenty of controversy on the UK's first and only dedicated fight channel.

Planned for Buncey's first show back are: super-heavyweight sensation Anthony Joshua who won silver at the World Amateur Championships; Britain's only ever World Amateur Champion Frankie Gavin to cast his verdict on the record medal haul by Team GB in Azerbaijan; East End favourite Johnny Greaves and bitter rivals Nathan Cleverly and Tony Bellew join in on the phone ahead of their big fight on Saturday night in Liverpool.

Make sure you tune in to allegedly tomorrow night from 8pm for Bunce's Boxing Hour.


Please just make sure this program is about boxing and not Bunce. Please!
Buncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 405
Joined: 24 Feb 2009, 07:44

Re: Buncey's Back!

Post by Buncey »

Davey,
I will do my best, but you know what he is like.

Adios.
Jon Saxon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1657
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 16:16

Re: Buncey's Back!

Post by Jon Saxon »

I'm glad to see it back!

They must have saw my post!! :yay:
Twinkle Toes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3344
Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 08:38

Re: Buncey's Back!

Post by Twinkle Toes »

Can't see this being anything more than an advert for allegedly and its fighters.
JC
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4578
Joined: 07 Jan 2004, 13:04

Re: Buncey's Back!

Post by JC »

allegedly wrote:Hi all,Steve Bunce's hugely popular Boxing Hour makes it long awaited return to UK television screens' tomorrow night (Monday 17th October) at 8pm, LIVE and exclusive on allegedly (Sky Platform Ch. 456).
Confused
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Buncey's Back!

Post by whiskey »

Image
Tomasino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7876
Joined: 24 Apr 2010, 16:39

Re: Buncey's Back!

Post by Tomasino »

Buncey wrote:Davey,
I will do my best, but you know what he is like.

Adios.

Aye he is mental!
:TU:
Giancarlo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2316
Joined: 23 Feb 2011, 15:32

Re: Buncey's Back!

Post by Giancarlo »

DaveBoyMorrison wrote:
Buncey wrote:Davey,
I will do my best, but you know what he is like.

Adios.

Aye he is mental!
:TU:
I suspect he is well paid to act that part.

I wonder if the gurning is natural or just done for dramatic effect.

Ah, good old Big Daddy Bunce; he's great for a laugh.

:D
Tomasino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7876
Joined: 24 Apr 2010, 16:39

Re: Buncey's Back!

Post by Tomasino »

Giancarlo wrote:
DaveBoyMorrison wrote:
Buncey wrote:Davey,
I will do my best, but you know what he is like.

Adios.

Aye he is mental!
:TU:
I suspect he is well paid to act that part.

I wonder if the gurning is natural or just done for dramatic effect.

Ah, good old Big Daddy Bunce; he's great for a laugh.

:D

I think the gurning is caused by jellied eels. I had to stop watching when he was on Setanta as he kept calling grown men "boy" and sparring with non existent opponents.


:box:


:OhYes:
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13319
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: Buncey's Back!

Post by MightyWarrior »

BIGMARK wrote:
Buncey wrote:I reached out for a big Sky fighter but was told: No way!
I will mention ALL fighters and fights. Don't expect me to give out Primetime's subscription details!

Adios and thanks.
Wow, that is a bit petty from Sky and also a little surprising seeing that Frank still has an existing contract with them. I said on another thread I wouldnt be surprised if Sky were behind allegedly in a silent partner type way. I say this as I was surprised they had Bellew in the studio on the recent bill from Liverpool when they surely knew his fight with Cleverley wasn't going to be on their channel.
Are you sure it wasn't FW who said No Way ?
JC
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4578
Joined: 07 Jan 2004, 13:04

Re: Buncey's Back!

Post by JC »

allegedly wrote:Sorry, getting ahead of the schedules! It should be Monday 10th October.
J-C wrote:
allegedly wrote:Hi all,Steve Bunce's hugely popular Boxing Hour makes it long awaited return to UK television screens' tomorrow night (Monday 17th October) at 8pm, LIVE and exclusive on allegedly (Sky Platform Ch. 456).
Confused
Nice one, looking forward to it :box:
Glyn Leach
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2135
Joined: 25 Dec 2007, 14:08

Re: Buncey's Back!

Post by Glyn Leach »

Buncey wrote:I reached out for a big Sky fighter but was told: No way!

Adios and thanks.
No no no, that helps no one. All the Promoters and TV boss bang on about trying to build boxing but then we get this, the same old degeneration into factions and alliances. Really disappointing. In truth I'm not surprised by this pettiness, but I am disappointed.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27513
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Buncey's Back!

Post by stujones »

Told no way by who Steve? allegedly? Sky? The fighters manager? The fighter himself? Its a little bit cryptic there.
Buncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 405
Joined: 24 Feb 2009, 07:44

Re: Buncey's Back!

Post by Buncey »

It's not a allegedly problem, let's leave it at that.
My policy on this show will be to have fighters from all promoters and TV networks. That's a fact.

Adios.
dondada
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8872
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 10:55

Re: Buncey's Back!

Post by dondada »

BIGMARK wrote:
Buncey wrote:I reached out for a big Sky fighter but was told: No way!
I will mention ALL fighters and fights. Don't expect me to give out Primetime's subscription details!

Adios and thanks.
Wow, that is a bit petty from Sky and also a little surprising seeing that Frank still has an existing contract with them.
You're kidding me, right Mark? :lol:

Man with contract at one TV channel helps set up another and you want the first one to HELP him? :lol:
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Re: Buncey's Back!

Post by DavidPayne »

A maths question for you what is four fifths of fornicate all?

For those who wanted more competition in the coverage of the sport.

Be careful what you wish for.
JamesH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1897
Joined: 08 Aug 2008, 09:16

Re: Buncey's Back!

Post by JamesH »

DavidPayne wrote:A maths question for you what is four fifths of eff all?

For those who wanted more competition in the coverage of the sport.

Be careful what you wish for.
I totally agree.

As I've mentioned on here before, more competition in the football Premiership market made it nearly twice as expensive to watch the Premiership.
Glyn Leach
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2135
Joined: 25 Dec 2007, 14:08

Re: Buncey's Back!

Post by Glyn Leach »

DavidPayne wrote:A maths question for you what is four fifths of eff all?

For those who wanted more competition in the coverage of the sport.

Be careful what you wish for.
Competition is healthy as long as the competitors aren't so childish as to factionalise and politicise it. It should be used as a spur to raise their own game rather than damage the larger whole and end of with the four fifths of fornicate all scenario. Schoolboy behaviour. Don't worry about the opposition, be confident in yourself - and if you can't be, ask yourself why and then try to put it right.
Scottrf
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1146
Joined: 30 Nov 2010, 05:43

Re: Buncey's Back!

Post by Scottrf »

Glyn Leach wrote:
DavidPayne wrote:A maths question for you what is four fifths of eff all?

For those who wanted more competition in the coverage of the sport.

Be careful what you wish for.
Competition is healthy as long as the competitors aren't so childish as to factionalise and politicise it. It should be used as a spur to raise their own game rather than damage the larger whole and end of with the four fifths of eff all scenario. Schoolboy behaviour. Don't worry about the opposition, be confident in yourself - and if you can't be, ask yourself why and then try to put it right.
A monopoly is good if it means you get to see all the fights on one channel rather than bidding wars and fights being split between 3/4 channels that you have to pay for separately though.
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13319
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Re: Buncey's Back!

Post by MightyWarrior »

Scottrf wrote:A monopoly is good if it means you get to see all the fights on one channel rather than bidding wars and fights being split between 3/4 channels that you have to pay for separately though.
Not neccesarily. When Sky were the only game in town, they could completely ignore a big Roy Jones fight, and pretend he didn't even exist. And decide not to show a fight as big as Trinidad/Hopkins, leaving us the viewers with no alternative channel to watch it on.

At least now Primetime et al are picking up the slack.

And FW and Sky are as bad as each other when it comes to a childish and spiteful attitude towards the competition.
Scottrf
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1146
Joined: 30 Nov 2010, 05:43

Re: Buncey's Back!

Post by Scottrf »

MightyWarrior wrote:
Scottrf wrote:A monopoly is good if it means you get to see all the fights on one channel rather than bidding wars and fights being split between 3/4 channels that you have to pay for separately though.
Not neccesarily. When Sky were the only game in town, they could completely ignore a big Roy Jones fight, and pretend he didn't even exist. And decide not to show a fight as big as Trinidad/Hopkins, leaving us the viewers with no alternative channel to watch it on.

At least now Primetime et al are picking up the slack.

And FW and Sky are as bad as each other when it comes to the competition.
Those examples are from a decade ago. At the start of this year they were looking like picking up every domestic fight and a good number of foreign ones. Now you have to subcribe to Box ntion and pay for a Primetime fight every couple of months to watch a similar number of fights. I don't think either have yet showed a fight Sky wouldn't have otherwise.
Post Reply