Billy Joe Saunders vs Hungarian Bum
-
BoxingAnalyst
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 129
- Joined: 10 Oct 2011, 11:10
Billy Joe Saunders vs Hungarian Bum
http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer
Shocking opponent, atleast he is fighting 3 weeks later for Southern area title.
Shocking opponent, atleast he is fighting 3 weeks later for Southern area title.
Last edited by BoxingAnalyst on 14 Oct 2011, 05:49, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Billy Joe Saunders vs Hungarian Bum
Hungarians are the new Latvians they seem to be on all the UK shows at the moment.
Re: Billy Joe Saunders vs Hungarian Bum
Probably 20 quid cheaper.pyenest77 wrote:Hungarians are the new Latvians they seem to be on all the UK shows at the moment.
-
BoxingAnalyst
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 129
- Joined: 10 Oct 2011, 11:10
Re: Billy Joe Saunders vs Hungarian Bum
Terrrrry wrote:Norbert
Re: Billy Joe Saunders vs Hungarian Bum
His career is certainly lagging.
Hopefully injury free, he can box a bit more often.
Hopefully injury free, he can box a bit more often.
Re: Billy Joe Saunders vs Hungarian Bum
I always fail to understand why promoters would rather bring over and cover the expenses of a poor eastern european fighter, rather than put them in with fighters from the UK, that would love a shot against a potential up and coming star like Billie Joe. Its things like this that make me reluctant to hand over £50 + for a ticket.
-
lefthook82
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1837
- Joined: 07 Mar 2008, 04:33
Re: Billy Joe Saunders vs Hungarian Bum
I hope the Hunagarian isn't pregnant
What weight is this being fought at? Is BJS still fcking about at 160lbs when he is clearly undersized, have to say I havent paid attention to him since about his 3rd fight
What weight is this being fought at? Is BJS still fcking about at 160lbs when he is clearly undersized, have to say I havent paid attention to him since about his 3rd fight
Re: Billy Joe Saunders vs Hungarian Bum
I know Billy's young and has to learn his craft, but as fans that watch this, it's boring and predictable, Billy wins this, zzzzzzzzzzzz
-
BoxingAnalyst
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 129
- Joined: 10 Oct 2011, 11:10
Re: Billy Joe Saunders vs Hungarian Bum
This fight is at 160, that is his weight from now on. Most of his career has been at 168. I dont think he is clearly undersized for 160, he's not big at the weight but he will grow into it if he loses the puppy fat and gets muscle. I would like to see him down at 154 though.lefthook82 wrote:I hope the Hunagarian isn't pregnant
What weight is this being fought at? Is BJS still fcking about at 160lbs when he is clearly undersized, have to say I havent paid attention to him since about his 3rd fight
Re: Billy Joe Saunders vs Hungarian Bum
Isn't it just a ticking over fight for the one a month later?
-
BoxingAnalyst
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 129
- Joined: 10 Oct 2011, 11:10
Re: Billy Joe Saunders vs Hungarian Bum
Yes, he's fighting Gary Boulden for the Southern Area Middleweight title on November 5th, undercard of Burns-KatsidisJamesH wrote:Isn't it just a ticking over fight for the one a month later?
http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer
Boulden is half decent, got a win over kreshnik Qato and a draw against Jeff Evans, he can't punch at all though.
Re: Billy Joe Saunders vs Hungarian Bum
Cheers mate.BoxingAnalyst wrote:Yes, he's fighting Gary Boulden for the Southern Area Middleweight title on November 5th, undercard of Burns-KatsidisJamesH wrote:Isn't it just a ticking over fight for the one a month later?
http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer
Boulden is half decent, got a win over kreshnik Qato and a draw against Jeff Evans, he can't punch at all though.
So we can forgive him this one then, surely?
-
BoxingAnalyst
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 129
- Joined: 10 Oct 2011, 11:10
Re: Billy Joe Saunders vs Hungarian Bum
It's Frank's fault. This opponent will be blown out in a few rounds when in reality Billy could do with 5 or 6 against a durable opponent after being out the ring for 5 monthsJamesH wrote:Cheers mate.BoxingAnalyst wrote:Yes, he's fighting Gary Boulden for the Southern Area Middleweight title on November 5th, undercard of Burns-KatsidisJamesH wrote:Isn't it just a ticking over fight for the one a month later?
http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer
Boulden is half decent, got a win over kreshnik Qato and a draw against Jeff Evans, he can't punch at all though.
So we can forgive him this one then, surely?
Re: Billy Joe Saunders vs Hungarian Bum
I don't see the problem, it's not top of the bill and he's fighting again in 3 weeks - would you rather him just not fight at all on sat then?
Re: Billy Joe Saunders vs Hungarian Bum
With you 100% on that.yid14 wrote:I don't see the problem, it's not top of the bill and he's fighting again in 3 weeks - would you rather him just not fight at all on sat then?
-
BoxingAnalyst
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 129
- Joined: 10 Oct 2011, 11:10
Re: Billy Joe Saunders vs Hungarian Bum
Why not get a tough journeyman in over 6 rounds, rather then an out of shape fatty who will role over after 1 body shot? I'm happy he's keeping busy, but not with the opponent.yid14 wrote:I don't see the problem, it's not top of the bill and he's fighting again in 3 weeks - would you rather him just not fight at all on sat then?
Re: Billy Joe Saunders vs Hungarian Bum
Guys Guys Guys..... the show has hungarian cameras present, so there is bound to be a few hungarian opponents, it helps bring in the money which helps pay the purses!!
Re: Billy Joe Saunders vs Hungarian Bum
I think the problem is fans don't want to see him constantly being lined up with crap to fight. He's been a pro now for what 2-3 tears, and hasn't had a realistic competetive fight.yid14 wrote:I don't see the problem, it's not top of the bill and he's fighting again in 3 weeks - would you rather him just not fight at all on sat then?
Re: Billy Joe Saunders vs Hungarian Bum
He has one next month though, so it's a walkover or nothing. You can't expect him to take any major risks with another (better) fight in a few weeks.wadey wrote:I think the problem is fans don't want to see him constantly being lined up with crap to fight. He's been a pro now for what 2-3 tears, and hasn't had a realistic competetive fight.yid14 wrote:I don't see the problem, it's not top of the bill and he's fighting again in 3 weeks - would you rather him just not fight at all on sat then?
-
BoxingAnalyst
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 129
- Joined: 10 Oct 2011, 11:10
Re: Billy Joe Saunders vs Hungarian Bum
Exactly, this will not go 3 rounds.Cardiff-Lad1 wrote:The fact that they've only allowed 15 mins on the schedule for this proposed 8 x 3 min fight should tell you all you need to know
Re: Billy Joe Saunders vs Hungarian Bum
Well don't stick him on the bill then, cos as i said it irritates Boxing fans and no one wants to see pointless fights like this against completely unknown Euro fighters.JamesH wrote:He has one next month though, so it's a walkover or nothing. You can't expect him to take any major risks with another (better) fight in a few weeks.wadey wrote:I think the problem is fans don't want to see him constantly being lined up with crap to fight. He's been a pro now for what 2-3 tears, and hasn't had a realistic competetive fight.yid14 wrote:I don't see the problem, it's not top of the bill and he's fighting again in 3 weeks - would you rather him just not fight at all on sat then?
Do you really feel differently? or just like to have a difference of opinion for the sake of it?
Re: Billy Joe Saunders vs Hungarian Bum
You don't speak for all boxing fans, muppet.wadey wrote:Well don't stick him on the bill then, cos as i said it irritates Boxing fans and no one wants to see pointless fights like this against completely unknown Euro fighters.JamesH wrote:He has one next month though, so it's a walkover or nothing. You can't expect him to take any major risks with another (better) fight in a few weeks.wadey wrote: I think the problem is fans don't want to see him constantly being lined up with crap to fight. He's been a pro now for what 2-3 tears, and hasn't had a realistic competetive fight.
Do you really feel differently? or just like to have a difference of opinion for the sake of it?
It irritates you and some others, while some other people think it's fine given his other fight a few weeks later. If you don't like people disagreeing with you, a forum probably isn't the right environment for you. I think it's a fairly pathetic comment you've made there, you probably realise that now yourself as you move onto some other whinging bandwagon.
I think some people like to moan and whinge for the 'sake of it'.
Re: Billy Joe Saunders vs Hungarian Bum
Unfortunately James there are certain users which you get on all forums that like nothing better than disagreeing with what appears to be the obvious opinion which is held by the vast majority. Why they do it i don't know, may be its to get noticed? every one is entitled to disagree but when it becomes a habit it is very boring.JamesH wrote:You don't speak for all boxing fans, muppet.wadey wrote:Well don't stick him on the bill then, cos as i said it irritates Boxing fans and no one wants to see pointless fights like this against completely unknown Euro fighters.JamesH wrote: He has one next month though, so it's a walkover or nothing. You can't expect him to take any major risks with another (better) fight in a few weeks.
Do you really feel differently? or just like to have a difference of opinion for the sake of it?
It irritates you and some others, while some other people think it's fine given his other fight a few weeks later. If you don't like people disagreeing with you, a forum probably isn't the right environment for you. I think it's a fairly pathetic comment you've made there, you probably realise that now yourself as you move onto some other whinging bandwagon.
I think some people like to moan and whinge for the 'sake of it'.
Unfortunately for you it would appear you fall into that category. May be you can give us an insight into what leads to behaviour like this?
Re: Billy Joe Saunders vs Hungarian Bum
An obvious opinion? Why, because it's yours? Because it is that of a majority? Come on, you must be capable of better than that? Or maybe not.
How about this for an insight.... I would say it's because I'm capable of my own thoughts and of forming my own opinion. I far prefer to be in that position than to be a sheep who echoes every moan and whinge everyone else cares to make. I like Frankie Gavin and James De Gale, that causes me a few problems on here, but usually only in debate. I used to like Eubank too, but I presume that's ok now as your cherished majority also do these days. Debating doesn't mean that anyone who disagrees with me is doing so for the sake of it or that they are wrong, I don't think I'd be as vain or paranoid to suggest such a thing. It would be a bit dull if I posted and the next posts were all just X2, X3, X4 etc.
And most of the users you refer to don't post under their real name.
I've been on here a while now and have never been dragged into as many arguments as I have recently. You used to be able to debate, disagree, and move on. The good posters are diminishing. Your type are on the increase. It's a shame, whatever the 'vast majority' might think.
Happy cheerleading
How about this for an insight.... I would say it's because I'm capable of my own thoughts and of forming my own opinion. I far prefer to be in that position than to be a sheep who echoes every moan and whinge everyone else cares to make. I like Frankie Gavin and James De Gale, that causes me a few problems on here, but usually only in debate. I used to like Eubank too, but I presume that's ok now as your cherished majority also do these days. Debating doesn't mean that anyone who disagrees with me is doing so for the sake of it or that they are wrong, I don't think I'd be as vain or paranoid to suggest such a thing. It would be a bit dull if I posted and the next posts were all just X2, X3, X4 etc.
And most of the users you refer to don't post under their real name.
I've been on here a while now and have never been dragged into as many arguments as I have recently. You used to be able to debate, disagree, and move on. The good posters are diminishing. Your type are on the increase. It's a shame, whatever the 'vast majority' might think.
Happy cheerleading