Froch - Ward STAREDOWN

ALI
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 14:10

Re: Froch - Ward STAREDOWN

Post by ALI »

Ward got the upper hand in that face off, and I think they both appear to know it. froch is up against it here, there is more chance of ward stopping him than there is of froch winning on points imo. We will know after two rounds if froch sta.ds any chance of winning, I strongly sispect he will loose every round, but I hope he prpves me wrong.
nobby_nobbins
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 654
Joined: 22 Apr 2008, 16:07

Re: Froch - Ward STAREDOWN

Post by nobby_nobbins »

If Froch allows Ward to get into his groove early on he'll struggle to impose himself. Froch needs to be at his awkward, most unorthodox best to keep Ward guessing.
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6441
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Froch - Ward STAREDOWN

Post by Deserter »

nobby_nobbins wrote:If Froch allows Ward to get into his groove early on he'll struggle to impose himself. Froch needs to be at his awkward, most unorthodox best to keep Ward guessing.
Exactly right. I'm desperate for Froch to win, but think Ward's handspeed and under-rated strength will see him win a fairly clear-cut decision.
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Froch - Ward STAREDOWN

Post by Asterix »

mrbassie wrote:Ward reminds me a little of Cotto (maybe that's just me, have only seen him fight a couple of times). I reckon Froch out to look to use his reach, lot's of straight punches and try to be the busier. If he gets his distancing right I reckon he can control him behind the jab.
If Froch has a reach advantage it's a small one. Don't trust Boxrec's figures for that; they're often inaccurate. Add to that, Ward has faster hands than Froch.
mrbassie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1563
Joined: 26 Oct 2003, 00:55

Re: Froch - Ward STAREDOWN

Post by mrbassie »

Asterix wrote:
mrbassie wrote:Ward reminds me a little of Cotto (maybe that's just me, have only seen him fight a couple of times). I reckon Froch out to look to use his reach, lot's of straight punches and try to be the busier. If he gets his distancing right I reckon he can control him behind the jab.
If Froch has a reach advantage it's a small one. Don't trust Boxrec's figures for that; they're often inaccurate. Add to that, Ward has faster hands than Froch.
What I'm getting at is him trying to rough up Ward isn't necessarily the right way to go about it. Ward's tasty on the inside and doesn't mind being dirty. On the other hand he doesn't move his head much so I think straight punching could reap rewards.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13436
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Froch - Ward STAREDOWN

Post by jameswilson »

In all of Ward's decision wins at World title level he has been winning the fight by miles going into the 9th round. Froch should make it his aim to be in the fight going into these rounds and take Ward into deep water, much in the same way as it was with the Taylor fight. Obviously on the judges scorecards Froch was way down but the commentators and ringside pundits all had the Froch-Taylor fight close going to the end of the fight.
jBacca
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5563
Joined: 14 Sep 2008, 17:40

Re: Froch - Ward STAREDOWN

Post by jBacca »

First time I've seen Ward in an interview. Came across really well; grounded and intelligent.

Here's hoping Frochy can do the job though.
nobby_nobbins
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 654
Joined: 22 Apr 2008, 16:07

Re: Froch - Ward STAREDOWN

Post by nobby_nobbins »

I agree that Froch needs to keep it long. Ward is lethal in close.
Asterix
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7128
Joined: 02 Nov 2007, 10:42

Re: Froch - Ward STAREDOWN

Post by Asterix »

mrbassie wrote:
Asterix wrote:
mrbassie wrote:Ward reminds me a little of Cotto (maybe that's just me, have only seen him fight a couple of times). I reckon Froch out to look to use his reach, lot's of straight punches and try to be the busier. If he gets his distancing right I reckon he can control him behind the jab.
If Froch has a reach advantage it's a small one. Don't trust Boxrec's figures for that; they're often inaccurate. Add to that, Ward has faster hands than Froch.
What I'm getting at is him trying to rough up Ward isn't necessarily the right way to go about it. Ward's tasty on the inside and doesn't mind being dirty. On the other hand he doesn't move his head much so I think straight punching could reap rewards.
Ward's got great reflexes though. I think Froch has a very, very, very tough fight ahead of him.
Trouble
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 29
Joined: 04 Dec 2011, 12:20

Re: Froch - Ward STAREDOWN

Post by Trouble »

nobby_nobbins wrote:I agree that Froch needs to keep it long. Ward is lethal in close.
yes. Froch needs to know when to take a 1/2 step backwards and catch Ward coming in. Up close its an asier fight for the headbutting style of Ward.
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Froch - Ward STAREDOWN

Post by Finn »

Counter-puncher wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:I dont agree with those who think Froch could bully Ward. I also think people are overating Carl's power. .
possibly, mate, but i think the real question is Froch's power in relation to Ward's chin, which is still untested. given the way he fights i don't think Ward himself is all that confident in his beard. :TU:
I heard from the yanks that ward got tagged as an am and went down like a sack of spuds from a not that hard punch. dont know if its true or not.
Post Reply