Khan conspiracy

Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Khan conspiracy

Post by Finn »

The Dark Destroyer wrote:Another twist in the tale? He might not be an IBF official.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/16458000.stm


:TU: i was just about to post that link. An official who shouldnt be there who isnt actually an official, who then celebrates in the ring after the fight. Redonkulous!
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Khan conspiracy

Post by Final round »

kingfinn wrote:
The Dark Destroyer wrote:Another twist in the tale? He might not be an IBF official.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/16458000.stm


:TU: i was just about to post that link. An official who shouldnt be there who isnt actually an official, who then celebrates in the ring after the fight. Redonkulous!
I'm loving this, I await the IBF's response.
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Khan conspiracy

Post by Finn »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
G0mez wrote:
gobbles wrote:
Like your mate Carl constantly claiming he was victim of home cooking in Denmark
Image

eh?
x 2 i think he may have posted what he was looking at, at the time by accident.
m1kee50
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4518
Joined: 04 Sep 2006, 11:07

Re: Khan conspiracy

Post by m1kee50 »

oliverc wrote:
gobbles wrote:
gobbles wrote:
After all, you're an expert in sour grapes and pathetic arguments
How's that Cox-Sai rematch coming along, Mr Integrity?
:lol: :lol: :bow:
seconded
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26425
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: Khan conspiracy

Post by banjo »

You know he'll not reply.
Wax On
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 314
Joined: 18 Dec 2007, 08:32

Re: Khan conspiracy

Post by Wax On »

The Dark Destroyer wrote:Another twist in the tale? He might not be an IBF official.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/16458000.stm
Freddie makes a really good point in the interview. It's very easy to be influenced watching a fight by the opinions of others. Boxing scoring is very subjective. Many posters on here say that they are influenced when scoring a fight by the commentary.

So if someone is sat next to a judge who shouldn't be, and is potenially suggesting boxer X has won certain rounds, or judge Y is scoring the bout differently, then that has got to be wrong!

Whether you think Khan won what was a very close fight or not, you must surely be able to understand his concerns????
ArtOfWar
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1253
Joined: 24 Oct 2003, 11:54

Re: Khan conspiracy

Post by ArtOfWar »

...
saad muhammad
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 201
Joined: 21 Feb 2009, 15:33

Re: Khan conspiracy

Post by saad muhammad »

He was the WBA supervisor.......not a judge.!
orbtastic
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12549
Joined: 05 Dec 2006, 11:22

Re: Khan conspiracy

Post by orbtastic »

saad muhammad wrote:He was the WBA supervisor.......not a judge.!
IBF supervisor, not working that night in any official capacity.
loaded_gloves
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1907
Joined: 09 Mar 2011, 12:18

Re: Khan conspiracy

Post by loaded_gloves »

Right, and none of us use our jobs/companies to get perks and go to things where we are not there in an official working capacity?

I use my job to constantly go to shows, be backstage, have a fun time. It's great.

If I was employed by the IBF then hell yes I'd also go to fights front row. And yes I'd be a presence and speak to officials since they would also be my colleagues.

Perks people, perks.
m1kee50
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4518
Joined: 04 Sep 2006, 11:07

Re: Khan conspiracy

Post by m1kee50 »

banjo wrote:You know he'll not reply.
I know, it's amusing nevertheless
broomy7s
Cruiserweight
Posts: 971
Joined: 19 May 2011, 07:53

Re: Khan conspiracy

Post by broomy7s »

I haven't actually heard Khan ask for a no contest, the lad would be happy with a rematch I reckon. He more than has enough scope to get a rematch.

Maybe Michael Welsh had a golden ticket.
WildWaylon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3223
Joined: 02 Nov 2005, 13:35

Re: Khan conspiracy

Post by WildWaylon »

Regardless of the controversy, the fight was so close a rematch would be the fairest decision. Khan lost the fight through fouling which he was warned about more than once, so he only has himself to blame. When the man was seen talking to the judge he should have been removed there and then. I dont understand how things like this can come about, its not a small hall fight.
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13394
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Khan conspiracy

Post by jameswilson »

loaded_gloves wrote:Right, and none of us use our jobs/companies to get perks and go to things where we are not there in an official working capacity?

I use my job to constantly go to shows, be backstage, have a fun time. It's great.

If I was employed by the IBF then hell yes I'd also go to fights front row. And yes I'd be a presence and speak to officials since they would also be my colleagues.

Perks people, perks.
I think the point they are making is if he wasn't there in an Official capacity he shouldn't be interfering with the judges during the fight.
observer1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1836
Joined: 27 Nov 2007, 22:30

Re: Khan conspiracy

Post by observer1 »

kingfinn wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
G0mez wrote: Image

eh?
x 2 i think he may have posted what he was looking at, at the time by accident.
:lol:
hitman_hatton1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6150
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57

Re: Khan conspiracy

Post by hitman_hatton1 »

the ibf are still mysteriously quiet. :roll:

the american based sanctioning body responsible for giving us eugenia williams. :o

and the jailbird ex president bob lee. :oops:

i thought khan won the fight.

the referee taking 2 pts off was ridiculous.

especially the 2nd deduction which cost him the fight.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Khan conspiracy

Post by crusader »

orbtastic wrote:
saad muhammad wrote:He was the WBA supervisor.......not a judge.!
IBF supervisor, not working that night in any official capacity.
He meant that the mystery man was interfering with the WBA supervisor......not a judge whose interpretation of the fight would have a direct impact on the outcome.

A rematch should be ordered, but the result should remain as is.
hoot
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 192
Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 16:58

Re: Khan conspiracy

Post by hoot »

The only thing they are interfearing with is Khan's ££££££££ and they take that very personal. :OhYes:
orbtastic
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12549
Joined: 05 Dec 2006, 11:22

Re: Khan conspiracy

Post by orbtastic »

crusader wrote:
orbtastic wrote:
saad muhammad wrote:He was the WBA supervisor.......not a judge.!
IBF supervisor, not working that night in any official capacity.
He meant that the mystery man was interfering with the WBA supervisor......not a judge whose interpretation of the fight would have a direct impact on the outcome.

A rematch should be ordered, but the result should remain as is.
Ah right. It was getting hard to follow with the previous comments.

I agree. I don't think there's any wrong doing here, just get the rematch on. Were the shoe on the other foot, I'm sure Peterson's camp would be asking for one.
Last edited by orbtastic on 09 Jan 2012, 08:58, edited 1 time in total.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Khan conspiracy

Post by Autobarn »

if the WBA are indeed insisting on a rematch, then all this nonsense about men in white suits "interfering" with people can finish. boxing often does have a bad image and this unsubstantiated stuff makes it all worse. let peterson have his 15 minutes of fame before he loses his title to khan, bradley or pacquiao.

also, fighters have certainly had complaints about refereeing when khan was the home fighter - barrera, limond - so what goes around comes around, you can't have things your own way all the time.
craigbaxter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 25
Joined: 20 Apr 2009, 15:45

Re: Khan conspiracy

Post by craigbaxter »

If the IBF don't insist on a rematch, could Peterson just put his WBA title on the line in a rematch so he is still a world champion no matter what the result of the fight?
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27489
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Khan conspiracy

Post by stujones »

craigbaxter wrote:If the IBF don't insist on a rematch, could Peterson just put his WBA title on the line in a rematch so he is still a world champion no matter what the result of the fight?
well, it wouldn't be a first but surely if Peterson was prepared to fight Khan, then surely would be confident enough of getting a result - and putting both on the line.

The awkard situation for Khan is if Peterson refuses to defend and the WBA strip him - give Khan the title (or fight for the vacant, interim interim belt) but Khan is left not being the "man" in the devision.

Khan doesn't need titles, he needs Peterson. Peterson don't need Khan.
tear up
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1832
Joined: 06 Dec 2010, 12:25

Re: Khan conspiracy

Post by tear up »

So you are questioning if I did something to harm my Muslim brother [Khan]? May almighty Allah protect me from what you and the rest of you assert. Don’t make assumptions based on allegations," said Ameen.
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6638
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: Khan conspiracy

Post by THEBUTCH »

I really thought Khan had changed his ways. :roll:

Grow up you spoilt little brat :witzend:
tear up
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1832
Joined: 06 Dec 2010, 12:25

Re: Khan conspiracy

Post by tear up »

THEBUTCH wrote:I really thought Khan had changed his ways. :roll:

Grow up you spoilt little brat :witzend:
think the pound sighn s went to his and his family s head years ago he thinkin the floyd fight is off after this and rightly so i thought it was a good fight :TU:
Post Reply