Last nights shobox - Chuck Giampa

Post Reply
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27513
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Last nights shobox - Chuck Giampa

Post by stujones »

http://www.stiffjab.net/post/1621720310 ... debut-ever


Stayed up for the fight and pissed myself.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27513
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Last nights shobox - Chuck Giampa

Post by stujones »

Well I do hope Shobox give him a chance - that would be a disaster.

I found him a pretty awful judge..... his 116-111 card for Calzaghe vs Hopkins didn't make any sense for me. He also had Chavez AHEAD of Taylor at the time of the stoppage.
IRLangmaid25
Cruiserweight
Posts: 3316
Joined: 01 Feb 2010, 19:08

Re: Last nights shobox - Chuck Giampa

Post by IRLangmaid25 »

stujones wrote:Well I do hope Shobox give him a chance - that would be a disaster.

I found him a pretty awful judge..... his 116-111 card for Calzaghe vs Hopkins didn't make any sense for me. He also had Chavez AHEAD of Taylor at the time of the stoppage.
Funny you should mention Chavez v Taylor. Chuck Giampa has recently started for the Ring explaining scoring etc and he stated that Chavez's punches more telling than Taylor's quantity of work and he had it 105-104 to Chavez going into the final round.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Last nights shobox - Chuck Giampa

Post by whiskey »

Choke !

I had the same dream before I did my best mans speech.
Wrists
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1281
Joined: 09 May 2005, 12:13

Re: Last nights shobox - Chuck Giampa

Post by Wrists »

stujones wrote:Well I do hope Shobox give him a chance - that would be a disaster.

I found him a pretty awful judge..... his 116-111 card for Calzaghe vs Hopkins didn't make any sense for me. He also had Chavez AHEAD of Taylor at the time of the stoppage.
That card was awful, nearly as bad as 114-114 Calzaghe v Kessler

:OhYes:
Dan Dares
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1584
Joined: 29 Nov 2010, 16:33

Re: Last nights shobox - Chuck Giampa

Post by Dan Dares »

stujones wrote:http://www.stiffjab.net/post/1621720310 ... debut-ever


Stayed up for the fight and pissed myself.
Quality.
Jon Saxon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1657
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 16:16

Re: Last nights shobox - Chuck Giampa

Post by Jon Saxon »

:o :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

But I also feel REALLY sorry for him
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27513
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Last nights shobox - Chuck Giampa

Post by stujones »

Wrists wrote:
stujones wrote:Well I do hope Shobox give him a chance - that would be a disaster.

I found him a pretty awful judge..... his 116-111 card for Calzaghe vs Hopkins didn't make any sense for me. He also had Chavez AHEAD of Taylor at the time of the stoppage.
That card was awful, nearly as bad as 114-114 Calzaghe v Kessler

:OhYes:
:OhYes: But I aint the one on good money for an expert opinion.

I saw on youtube an excellent "final analysis" of Leonard vs Hearns 2. Its a fascinating programme. I think it was Dalby Shearly (sorry I cannot remember who it was) - but the one who scored it a draw who actually said, just a couple of days after the fight. He thought Hearns won and couldn't really believe it when his card tallied up..... pretty much the same as what I said about Cal vs Kessler.

Jerry Roth - who scored the bout to Leonard.... I believe said something similar at the time, but in a more recent interview said on reflection. He stands by his decision, Ray won the fight.
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6618
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Re: Last nights shobox - Chuck Giampa

Post by rhino222 »

effin clown...cant believe he needed an autocue for that crap...
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Last nights shobox - Chuck Giampa

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

what a tool
Post Reply