Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?

smoggy7188
Cruiserweight
Posts: 941
Joined: 27 Oct 2010, 12:27

Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?

Post by smoggy7188 »

Did anyone else just see that on Ringside? Broner is lining him up apparently.
jessi
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3008
Joined: 11 Jul 2010, 11:59

Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?

Post by jessi »

smoggy7188 wrote:Did anyone else just see that on Ringside? Broner is lining him up apparently.
Haven't seen it yet, come on Sykes :bag:
safeerah
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1195
Joined: 18 Mar 2010, 07:35

Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?

Post by safeerah »

jessi wrote:
smoggy7188 wrote:Did anyone else just see that on Ringside? Broner is lining him up apparently.
Haven't seen it yet, come on Sykes :bag:
Pure destuction I think, different levels, different planets.
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?

Post by Final round »

I hope Gary gets it but a mullering seems on the cards in all honesty.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?

Post by Horse »

Good luck to Sykes.

I'd like to see more British fighters in Sykes' position getting world title shots out of the blue like this. They have little to lose and a lot to gain.
Fatsam
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 454
Joined: 13 Jun 2008, 11:14

Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?

Post by Fatsam »

Yes goodluck to sykes as he will need a shitload of it.
IronLiver
Cruiserweight
Posts: 136
Joined: 15 Mar 2011, 10:30

Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?

Post by IronLiver »

He's good lad and a nice guy.

But there's only 1 result here.

Hope he get through it with a nice payday and with his face still attached to his head.
billy nelson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1966
Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49

Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?

Post by billy nelson »

[quote="Horse"]Good luck to Sykes.

I'd like to see more British fighters in Sykes' position getting world title shots out of the blue like this. They have little to lose and a lot to gain.[/quote agreed mate if your not in it you wont win it
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6441
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?

Post by Deserter »

billy nelson wrote:
Horse wrote:Good luck to Sykes.

I'd like to see more British fighters in Sykes' position getting world title shots out of the blue like this. They have little to lose and a lot to gain.[/quote agreed mate if your not in it you wont win it
Politely disagree. A bad loss can be massively damaging to a fighter's confidence and inhibit their development. I want to see British fighters not just in credible world title fights, but winning them, and that requires timing on occasion.
In terms of this specific example, this would be real 'lamb to the slaughter' stuff that I for one can't get remotely enthused about.
Glyn Leach
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2135
Joined: 25 Dec 2007, 14:08

Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?

Post by Glyn Leach »

Horse wrote:Good luck to Sykes.

I'd like to see more British fighters in Sykes' position getting world title shots out of the blue like this. They have little to lose and a lot to gain.

10-rounder mate, not a title shot (allegedly)
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?

Post by Horse »

Glyn Leach wrote:
Horse wrote:Good luck to Sykes.

I'd like to see more British fighters in Sykes' position getting world title shots out of the blue like this. They have little to lose and a lot to gain.
10-rounder mate, not a title shot (allegedly)
That's a shame, but it is still a good opportunity.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?

Post by Horse »

Deserter wrote:Politely disagree. A bad loss can be massively damaging to a fighter's confidence and inhibit their development. I want to see British fighters not just in credible world title fights, but winning them, and that requires timing on occasion.
In terms of this specific example, this would be real 'lamb to the slaughter' stuff that I for one can't get remotely enthused about.
Is Sykes ever likely to get in a position where he is likely to win a world title? If he turned this down he probably wouldn't get another chance.
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6441
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?

Post by Deserter »

Horse wrote:
Deserter wrote:Politely disagree. A bad loss can be massively damaging to a fighter's confidence and inhibit their development. I want to see British fighters not just in credible world title fights, but winning them, and that requires timing on occasion.
In terms of this specific example, this would be real 'lamb to the slaughter' stuff that I for one can't get remotely enthused about.
Is Sykes ever likely to get in a position where he is likely to win a world title? If he turned this down he probably wouldn't get another chance.
Yes, and that's fair comment in this specific case. However, from my perspective as a fan (as opposed to the fighter himself), it's not a match I can feel comfortable with in the same way I didn't enjoy the Lockett-Pavlik and Barrera-Wenton debacles. Levels apart.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?

Post by Horse »

Deserter wrote:Yes, and that's fair comment in this specific case. However, from my perspective as a fan (as opposed to the fighter himself), it's not a match I can feel comfortable with in the same way I didn't enjoy the Lockett-Pavlik and Barrera-Wenton debacles. Levels apart.
I won't be getting very excited about it, but I wasn't excited about Hope vs Proksa either and Hope surprised me and won that.
jBacca
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5563
Joined: 14 Sep 2008, 17:40

Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?

Post by jBacca »

Horse wrote:
Deserter wrote:Yes, and that's fair comment in this specific case. However, from my perspective as a fan (as opposed to the fighter himself), it's not a match I can feel comfortable with in the same way I didn't enjoy the Lockett-Pavlik and Barrera-Wenton debacles. Levels apart.
I won't be getting very excited about it, but I wasn't excited about Hope vs Proksa either and Hope surprised me and won that.
This is about levels though. Broner will destroy Sykes. Hopefully in the first round because he really could hurt Sykes here.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?

Post by whiskey »

Grab the opportunity Mr Sykes,

You can possibly tell your kids 'your fought a great in Vegas' if everything people predict for broner comes to fruition.
jBacca
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5563
Joined: 14 Sep 2008, 17:40

Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?

Post by jBacca »

G0mez wrote:Grab the opportunity Mr Sykes,

You can possibly tell your kids 'your fought a great in Vegas' if everything people predict for broner comes to fruition.
Aye, that's a good shout.
JC
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4579
Joined: 07 Jan 2004, 13:04

Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?

Post by JC »

I assume they sought out a British opponent for a reason. Are they trying to build Broner up to the Sky audience, with it being Khan undercard?
Glyn Leach
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2135
Joined: 25 Dec 2007, 14:08

Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?

Post by Glyn Leach »

J-C wrote:I assume they sought out a British opponent for a reason. Are they trying to build Broner up to the Sky audience, with it being Khan undercard?
Is it definitely on Sky?
JC
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4579
Joined: 07 Jan 2004, 13:04

Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?

Post by JC »

Glyn Leach wrote:
J-C wrote:I assume they sought out a British opponent for a reason. Are they trying to build Broner up to the Sky audience, with it being Khan undercard?
Is it definitely on Sky?
Not sure actually Glyn. I just assumed it was because they showed the last one, I also thought I remembered reading that Khan was back with Sky now.
Matt W
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1605
Joined: 28 Aug 2007, 10:14

Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?

Post by Matt W »

Ouch!
jockdownie
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4
Joined: 19 Jan 2011, 03:06

Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?

Post by jockdownie »

Deserter wrote:
billy nelson wrote:
Horse wrote:Good luck to Sykes.

I'd like to see more British fighters in Sykes' position getting world title shots out of the blue like this. They have little to lose and a lot to gain.[/quote agreed mate if your not in it you wont win it
Politely disagree. A bad loss can be massively damaging to a fighter's confidence and inhibit their development. I want to see British fighters not just in credible world title fights, but winning them, and that requires timing on occasion.
In terms of this specific example, this would be real 'lamb to the slaughter' stuff that I for one can't get remotely enthused about.
completly agree with the above, all we have to look at is jennings vs cotto and lockett vs pavlick as prime examples
Glyn Leach
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2135
Joined: 25 Dec 2007, 14:08

Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?

Post by Glyn Leach »

J-C wrote:
Glyn Leach wrote:
J-C wrote:I assume they sought out a British opponent for a reason. Are they trying to build Broner up to the Sky audience, with it being Khan undercard?
Is it definitely on Sky?
Not sure actually Glyn. I just assumed it was because they showed the last one, I also thought I remembered reading that Khan was back with Sky now.
Wouldn't surprise me to see the fight on Primetime TBH. You might be right, maybe Khan is contracted to Sky, but they'll go where the money is I imagine. Apparently BoxNat put in a very big bid for Froch-Bute, they might have done the same here. Very competitive out there now.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?

Post by leforge »

Glyn Leach wrote:
J-C wrote:
Glyn Leach wrote: Is it definitely on Sky?
Not sure actually Glyn. I just assumed it was because they showed the last one, I also thought I remembered reading that Khan was back with Sky now.
Wouldn't surprise me to see the fight on Primetime TBH. You might be right, maybe Khan is contracted to Sky, but they'll go where the money is I imagine. Apparently BoxNat put in a very big bid for Froch-Bute, they might have done the same here. Very competitive out there now.
What are allegedly paying for things with. Look at the promotors 2011 accounts! Its live on sky sports 1.
mfc_se15
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 888
Joined: 03 Mar 2012, 08:34

Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?

Post by mfc_se15 »

J-C wrote:
Glyn Leach wrote:
J-C wrote:I assume they sought out a British opponent for a reason. Are they trying to build Broner up to the Sky audience, with it being Khan undercard?
Is it definitely on Sky?
Not sure actually Glyn. I just assumed it was because they showed the last one, I also thought I remembered reading that Khan was back with Sky now.

On Ringside they mentioned about the fights they have this month and then said something about a very exciting May including the rematch of the year Peterson v Khan. So almost certain unless something changes very soon they have it. Plus I think when they showed the last fight they said it was atleast a 3 fight deal.
Post Reply