Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?
-
smoggy7188
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 941
- Joined: 27 Oct 2010, 12:27
Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?
Did anyone else just see that on Ringside? Broner is lining him up apparently.
Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?
Haven't seen it yet, come on Sykessmoggy7188 wrote:Did anyone else just see that on Ringside? Broner is lining him up apparently.
Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?
Pure destuction I think, different levels, different planets.jessi wrote:Haven't seen it yet, come on Sykessmoggy7188 wrote:Did anyone else just see that on Ringside? Broner is lining him up apparently.
-
Final round
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02
Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?
I hope Gary gets it but a mullering seems on the cards in all honesty.
Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?
Good luck to Sykes.
I'd like to see more British fighters in Sykes' position getting world title shots out of the blue like this. They have little to lose and a lot to gain.
I'd like to see more British fighters in Sykes' position getting world title shots out of the blue like this. They have little to lose and a lot to gain.
Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?
Yes goodluck to sykes as he will need a shitload of it.
Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?
He's good lad and a nice guy.
But there's only 1 result here.
Hope he get through it with a nice payday and with his face still attached to his head.
But there's only 1 result here.
Hope he get through it with a nice payday and with his face still attached to his head.
-
billy nelson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1966
- Joined: 12 Apr 2010, 12:49
Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?
[quote="Horse"]Good luck to Sykes.
I'd like to see more British fighters in Sykes' position getting world title shots out of the blue like this. They have little to lose and a lot to gain.[/quote agreed mate if your not in it you wont win it
I'd like to see more British fighters in Sykes' position getting world title shots out of the blue like this. They have little to lose and a lot to gain.[/quote agreed mate if your not in it you wont win it
Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?
Politely disagree. A bad loss can be massively damaging to a fighter's confidence and inhibit their development. I want to see British fighters not just in credible world title fights, but winning them, and that requires timing on occasion.billy nelson wrote:Horse wrote:Good luck to Sykes.
I'd like to see more British fighters in Sykes' position getting world title shots out of the blue like this. They have little to lose and a lot to gain.[/quote agreed mate if your not in it you wont win it
In terms of this specific example, this would be real 'lamb to the slaughter' stuff that I for one can't get remotely enthused about.
-
Glyn Leach
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2135
- Joined: 25 Dec 2007, 14:08
Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?
Horse wrote:Good luck to Sykes.
I'd like to see more British fighters in Sykes' position getting world title shots out of the blue like this. They have little to lose and a lot to gain.
10-rounder mate, not a title shot (allegedly)
Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?
That's a shame, but it is still a good opportunity.Glyn Leach wrote:10-rounder mate, not a title shot (allegedly)Horse wrote:Good luck to Sykes.
I'd like to see more British fighters in Sykes' position getting world title shots out of the blue like this. They have little to lose and a lot to gain.
Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?
Is Sykes ever likely to get in a position where he is likely to win a world title? If he turned this down he probably wouldn't get another chance.Deserter wrote:Politely disagree. A bad loss can be massively damaging to a fighter's confidence and inhibit their development. I want to see British fighters not just in credible world title fights, but winning them, and that requires timing on occasion.
In terms of this specific example, this would be real 'lamb to the slaughter' stuff that I for one can't get remotely enthused about.
Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?
Yes, and that's fair comment in this specific case. However, from my perspective as a fan (as opposed to the fighter himself), it's not a match I can feel comfortable with in the same way I didn't enjoy the Lockett-Pavlik and Barrera-Wenton debacles. Levels apart.Horse wrote:Is Sykes ever likely to get in a position where he is likely to win a world title? If he turned this down he probably wouldn't get another chance.Deserter wrote:Politely disagree. A bad loss can be massively damaging to a fighter's confidence and inhibit their development. I want to see British fighters not just in credible world title fights, but winning them, and that requires timing on occasion.
In terms of this specific example, this would be real 'lamb to the slaughter' stuff that I for one can't get remotely enthused about.
Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?
I won't be getting very excited about it, but I wasn't excited about Hope vs Proksa either and Hope surprised me and won that.Deserter wrote:Yes, and that's fair comment in this specific case. However, from my perspective as a fan (as opposed to the fighter himself), it's not a match I can feel comfortable with in the same way I didn't enjoy the Lockett-Pavlik and Barrera-Wenton debacles. Levels apart.
Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?
This is about levels though. Broner will destroy Sykes. Hopefully in the first round because he really could hurt Sykes here.Horse wrote:I won't be getting very excited about it, but I wasn't excited about Hope vs Proksa either and Hope surprised me and won that.Deserter wrote:Yes, and that's fair comment in this specific case. However, from my perspective as a fan (as opposed to the fighter himself), it's not a match I can feel comfortable with in the same way I didn't enjoy the Lockett-Pavlik and Barrera-Wenton debacles. Levels apart.
Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?
Grab the opportunity Mr Sykes,
You can possibly tell your kids 'your fought a great in Vegas' if everything people predict for broner comes to fruition.
You can possibly tell your kids 'your fought a great in Vegas' if everything people predict for broner comes to fruition.
Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?
Aye, that's a good shout.G0mez wrote:Grab the opportunity Mr Sykes,
You can possibly tell your kids 'your fought a great in Vegas' if everything people predict for broner comes to fruition.
Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?
I assume they sought out a British opponent for a reason. Are they trying to build Broner up to the Sky audience, with it being Khan undercard?
-
Glyn Leach
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2135
- Joined: 25 Dec 2007, 14:08
Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?
Is it definitely on Sky?J-C wrote:I assume they sought out a British opponent for a reason. Are they trying to build Broner up to the Sky audience, with it being Khan undercard?
Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?
Not sure actually Glyn. I just assumed it was because they showed the last one, I also thought I remembered reading that Khan was back with Sky now.Glyn Leach wrote:Is it definitely on Sky?J-C wrote:I assume they sought out a British opponent for a reason. Are they trying to build Broner up to the Sky audience, with it being Khan undercard?
-
jockdownie
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 19 Jan 2011, 03:06
Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?
completly agree with the above, all we have to look at is jennings vs cotto and lockett vs pavlick as prime examplesDeserter wrote:Politely disagree. A bad loss can be massively damaging to a fighter's confidence and inhibit their development. I want to see British fighters not just in credible world title fights, but winning them, and that requires timing on occasion.billy nelson wrote:Horse wrote:Good luck to Sykes.
I'd like to see more British fighters in Sykes' position getting world title shots out of the blue like this. They have little to lose and a lot to gain.[/quote agreed mate if your not in it you wont win it
In terms of this specific example, this would be real 'lamb to the slaughter' stuff that I for one can't get remotely enthused about.
-
Glyn Leach
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2135
- Joined: 25 Dec 2007, 14:08
Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?
Wouldn't surprise me to see the fight on Primetime TBH. You might be right, maybe Khan is contracted to Sky, but they'll go where the money is I imagine. Apparently BoxNat put in a very big bid for Froch-Bute, they might have done the same here. Very competitive out there now.J-C wrote:Not sure actually Glyn. I just assumed it was because they showed the last one, I also thought I remembered reading that Khan was back with Sky now.Glyn Leach wrote:Is it definitely on Sky?J-C wrote:I assume they sought out a British opponent for a reason. Are they trying to build Broner up to the Sky audience, with it being Khan undercard?
Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?
What are allegedly paying for things with. Look at the promotors 2011 accounts! Its live on sky sports 1.Glyn Leach wrote:Wouldn't surprise me to see the fight on Primetime TBH. You might be right, maybe Khan is contracted to Sky, but they'll go where the money is I imagine. Apparently BoxNat put in a very big bid for Froch-Bute, they might have done the same here. Very competitive out there now.J-C wrote:Not sure actually Glyn. I just assumed it was because they showed the last one, I also thought I remembered reading that Khan was back with Sky now.Glyn Leach wrote: Is it definitely on Sky?
Re: Broner vs Sykes on Khan undercard?
J-C wrote:Not sure actually Glyn. I just assumed it was because they showed the last one, I also thought I remembered reading that Khan was back with Sky now.Glyn Leach wrote:Is it definitely on Sky?J-C wrote:I assume they sought out a British opponent for a reason. Are they trying to build Broner up to the Sky audience, with it being Khan undercard?
On Ringside they mentioned about the fights they have this month and then said something about a very exciting May including the rematch of the year Peterson v Khan. So almost certain unless something changes very soon they have it. Plus I think when they showed the last fight they said it was atleast a 3 fight deal.