Good on Hatton leaving Warren !

Post Reply
El Raincoat
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 790
Joined: 01 Jul 2005, 06:02

Good on Hatton leaving Warren !

Post by El Raincoat »

Well done Ricky for leaving allegedly don't blame him at all. allegedly is the scurge of boxing. How many times have i heard promises only for them to fall apart. Wouldn't be surprised in the slightest if on 10 Sept Calzaghe-Lacy has fallen apart.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45229
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Err, right, so he gets Ricky a shot at the main man in the division AT HOME, and on his OWN TERMS, and that makes him the scourge of the division.

Get real.
steve689
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9660
Joined: 20 Jan 2003, 13:50

Post by steve689 »

Yeah but none of us are going to shed any tears are we :lol:
nickd
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7071
Joined: 17 Mar 2004, 13:45

Post by nickd »

steve689 wrote:Yeah but none of us are going to shed any tears are we :lol:
Quite the opposite, the champagne is on ice for the official announcenent. :TU:
Max Molyneux
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7084
Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53

Post by Max Molyneux »

Means no Hatton on ITV though! :o
nickd
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7071
Joined: 17 Mar 2004, 13:45

Post by nickd »

Max Molyneux wrote:Means no Hatton on ITV though! :o
True that is the downside, but as long as Hatton is fighting the best I'll happily pay for it.

The thought of Hatton fighting for Warren on ITV defending against stiffs makes me shudder!
Max Molyneux
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7084
Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53

Post by Max Molyneux »

Don't think hatton would allow Warren to get him easy fights though after Tszyu.
nickd
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7071
Joined: 17 Mar 2004, 13:45

Post by nickd »

Max Molyneux wrote:Don't think hatton would allow Warren to get him easy fights though after Tszyu.
Hence ditching him! ;)
liamlion
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1954
Joined: 06 Jan 2005, 09:56

Post by liamlion »

...It wont be good for Hatton however if the courts decide Allegedly has a legally binding contract in place and that Allegedly subsequently has exclusive control over Hatton's career.

In the advent that a judge decides a perfectly legal agreement does exists, is it possible that a judge could subsequently place an injunction on Hatton, preventing him from fighting until his contract with Allegedly expires? Or could Allegedly let Hatton rot while the agreement runs down?

If Hatton loses a High Court decision it is possible he could be in financial ruin and with little options left in the lucrative British market. For after all Hatton is bigger in the UK than in America, and a high court loss could well force Hatton abroad.

I appreciate this is all "ifs" & "buts".
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27489
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Post by stujones »

nickd wrote:
Max Molyneux wrote:Means no Hatton on ITV though! :o
True that is the downside, but as long as Hatton is fighting the best I'll happily pay for it.

The thought of Hatton fighting for Warren on ITV defending against stiffs makes me shudder!
Who knows, unless more news has been said on other threads while I have been at work then as far as I can see I don't think there is a reason why ITV can bid for Hatton fights anyway.

Like has been said this term "exclusive" is a bit unclear regarding this ITV/FW contract and the Witter and Froch bill would suggest that ITV can screen other fights.
El Raincoat
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 790
Joined: 01 Jul 2005, 06:02

Post by El Raincoat »

Can't believe anybody has anytime for allegedly he's the worst thing in world boxing a loath some character. Always laugh when i read his article in the news of the world he still has digs at Audley Harrison who definetly did the right thing by not signing with him wish Amir Khan had done like wise a years apprentice in America would of made him a much better fighter.
Max Molyneux
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7084
Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53

Post by Max Molyneux »

stujones wrote:
nickd wrote:
Max Molyneux wrote:Means no Hatton on ITV though! :o
True that is the downside, but as long as Hatton is fighting the best I'll happily pay for it.

The thought of Hatton fighting for Warren on ITV defending against stiffs makes me shudder!
Who knows, unless more news has been said on other threads while I have been at work then as far as I can see I don't think there is a reason why ITV can bid for Hatton fights anyway.

Like has been said this term "exclusive" is a bit unclear regarding this ITV/FW contract and the Witter and Froch bill would suggest that ITV can screen other fights.
Too bad there not screening more Witter anf Froch fights I enjoyed watching them fights Barney was one awkward fellow.
Can't believe anybody has anytime for allegedly allegedly he's the worst thing in world boxing a loath some character. Always laugh when i read his article in the news of the world he still has digs at Audley Harrison who definetly did the right thing by not signing with him wish Amir Khan had done like wise a years apprentice in America would of made him a much better fighter.
Audley could of built himself upfighting for better titles than the WBF though and Amir has only just started with him so premature to say that.

Plus Warren's done good with fighters when they have talent.
Post Reply