McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.

exittored
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1565
Joined: 19 Apr 2008, 19:40

Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.

Post by exittored »

Terrible performance from McIntosh, didn't seem interested from the start or focused on his gameplan.

Bellew did his job and got him out of there but still not convinced he's anything more then domestic level although i hope Bellew proves me wrong.
Last edited by exittored on 27 Apr 2012, 17:59, edited 1 time in total.
exittored
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1565
Joined: 19 Apr 2008, 19:40

Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.

Post by exittored »

Ismayl Silakh, the future of the Light Heavyweight division is fighting tonight on espn.
Last edited by exittored on 27 Apr 2012, 18:00, edited 1 time in total.
Craig14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2933
Joined: 17 Jun 2010, 12:25

Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.

Post by Craig14 »

tommo100 wrote:cleverley is hiding behind the sofa now!
well he better come out, surely there gonna drag another no-hope european with a padded record over for him soon.
TheCobra
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3450
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 15:11

Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.

Post by TheCobra »

I think based on tonight and Bellew's performance against Cleverly I think he is well above the domestic level guys. I can see Bellew getting a Euro title and being a fringe world level guy, he has the right attitude to keep improving and who knows might get a world title one day.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.

Post by leforge »

yid14 wrote:
tommo100 wrote:cleverley is hiding behind the sofa now!
well he better come out, surely there gonna drag another no-hope european with a padded record over for him soon.
Its Hopkins in big summer fight you not heard!
Craig14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2933
Joined: 17 Jun 2010, 12:25

Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.

Post by Craig14 »

leforge wrote:
yid14 wrote:
tommo100 wrote:cleverley is hiding behind the sofa now!
well he better come out, surely there gonna drag another no-hope european with a padded record over for him soon.
Its Hopkins in big summer fight you not heard!
Really oh dear.....
states
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3554
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 13:40

Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.

Post by states »

leforge wrote: Its Hopkins in big summer fight you not heard!
I've heard Hopkins turned down Frank's very generous offer, which hasn't actually been offered, already, so it's on hold. Who'd have thunk it :D . There's no truth in the rumour that Hopkins hasn't got a fornicating clue who Cleverly is.
Last edited by states on 27 Apr 2012, 18:03, edited 1 time in total.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17106
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.

Post by keithmoonhangover »

That's what's wrong with our sport right there. a guy who is 1-10 is allowed in the ring with a hot prospect. The BBBofC should be ashamed.
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

keithmoonhangover wrote:That's what's wrong with our sport right there. a guy who is 1-10 is allowed in the ring with a hot prospect. The BBBofC should be ashamed.
Dan naylor had never been stopped and by his own admission colquhoun had never stopped anyone pro or am.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17106
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.

Post by keithmoonhangover »

ShadrachSimmo wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:That's what's wrong with our sport right there. a guy who is 1-10 is allowed in the ring with a hot prospect. The BBBofC should be ashamed.
Dan naylor had never been stopped and by his own admission colquhoun had never stopped anyone pro or am.
I know that mate. But that's ten defeats on the bounce. Don't you think the BBBofC have a duty to only sanction more even fights.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17106
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.

Post by keithmoonhangover »

And now we have a 3-78 fighter. It's wrong.
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

keithmoonhangover wrote:And now we have a 3-78 fighter. It's wrong.
Whats wrong? You need journeyman in boxing. Young fighters have to learn their trade. Going straight in with fellow novices or champions doesnt give you that.
Craig14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2933
Joined: 17 Jun 2010, 12:25

Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.

Post by Craig14 »

keithmoonhangover wrote:And now we have a 3-78 fighter. It's wrong.
oi watch your mouth that's one of ours :oo
states
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3554
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 13:40

Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.

Post by states »

ShadrachSimmo wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:And now we have a 3-78 fighter. It's wrong.
Whats wrong? You need journeyman in boxing. Young fighters have to learn their trade. Going straight in with fellow novices or champions doesnt give you that.
There's journeymen and then there's punching bags though. I don't know what you learn in a fight you're guaranteed to win that you can't learn in sparring.
tommo100
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 377
Joined: 06 Dec 2008, 15:59

Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.

Post by tommo100 »

keithmoonhangover wrote:And now we have a 3-78 fighter. It's wrong.

it`s a living mate,he`ll be happy picking up his £700 and looking forward to fighting again in a few weeks,providing he`s healthy,i don`t see anything wrong with it
anyone can pick up a pro license as long as you pass the medical and ar`nt an axe murderer
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17106
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.

Post by keithmoonhangover »

ShadrachSimmo wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:And now we have a 3-78 fighter. It's wrong.
Whats wrong? You need journeyman in boxing. Young fighters have to learn their trade. Going straight in with fellow novices or champions doesnt give you that.
That's not the point. If Greaves loses this one, it's 25 loses on the bounce. A prospect learning should not be the reason for this fight being made.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17106
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.

Post by keithmoonhangover »

yid14 wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:And now we have a 3-78 fighter. It's wrong.
oi watch your mouth that's one of ours :oo
:oo

Hello mate. How/where are you?
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

states wrote:
ShadrachSimmo wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:And now we have a 3-78 fighter. It's wrong.
Whats wrong? You need journeyman in boxing. Young fighters have to learn their trade. Going straight in with fellow novices or champions doesnt give you that.
There's journeymen and then there's punching bags though. I don't know what you learn in a fight you're guaranteed to win that you can't learn in sparring.
Getting the rounds in in a pro fight is what is important. We know journeyman are expected to lose.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.

Post by Horse »

What happened to Watson vs Cook and Thompson vs Corcoran?

Why are Sky showing this low level rubbish?
Craig14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2933
Joined: 17 Jun 2010, 12:25

Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.

Post by Craig14 »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
yid14 wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:And now we have a 3-78 fighter. It's wrong.
oi watch your mouth that's one of ours :oo
:oo

Hello mate. How/where are you?
Hello mate, still in Auckland and allgood.
Hope all's well with you and yours. :box:
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17106
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Horse wrote:What happened to Watson vs Cook and Thompson vs Corcoran?

Why are Sky showing this low level rubbish?
I agree Horse.
Craig14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2933
Joined: 17 Jun 2010, 12:25

Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.

Post by Craig14 »

Casio wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
Horse wrote:What happened to Watson vs Cook and Thompson vs Corcoran?

Why are Sky showing this low level rubbish?
I agree Horse.
Cook pulled out of the fight last week so Watson ended up fighting Darren Hamilton and Hamilton won 77-76 on points.
Wow that's abit of a turn-up.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.

Post by Horse »

That was a poor show.

I hope Hearn is going to be offering better than that in the future with their new Sky deal.
Alexey Uralets
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 121
Joined: 05 Feb 2012, 08:36

Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.

Post by Alexey Uralets »

Bellew was really good. Defo i wanna see Bellew-Cleverly rematch.
Tommy Gunn13
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3290
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11

Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.

Post by Tommy Gunn13 »

Horse wrote:That was a poor show.

I hope Hearn is going to be offering better than that in the future with their new Sky deal.
One live fight do you mean???
Pehaps this is the way forward now Pretty Boy Hearn has control.. I know it was a Coldwell show,but poor Dave didnt even get a LIVE word on Tv........
Post Reply