McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
Terrible performance from McIntosh, didn't seem interested from the start or focused on his gameplan.
Bellew did his job and got him out of there but still not convinced he's anything more then domestic level although i hope Bellew proves me wrong.
Bellew did his job and got him out of there but still not convinced he's anything more then domestic level although i hope Bellew proves me wrong.
Last edited by exittored on 27 Apr 2012, 17:59, edited 1 time in total.
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
Ismayl Silakh, the future of the Light Heavyweight division is fighting tonight on espn.
Last edited by exittored on 27 Apr 2012, 18:00, edited 1 time in total.
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
well he better come out, surely there gonna drag another no-hope european with a padded record over for him soon.tommo100 wrote:cleverley is hiding behind the sofa now!
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
I think based on tonight and Bellew's performance against Cleverly I think he is well above the domestic level guys. I can see Bellew getting a Euro title and being a fringe world level guy, he has the right attitude to keep improving and who knows might get a world title one day.
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
Its Hopkins in big summer fight you not heard!yid14 wrote:well he better come out, surely there gonna drag another no-hope european with a padded record over for him soon.tommo100 wrote:cleverley is hiding behind the sofa now!
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
Really oh dear.....leforge wrote:Its Hopkins in big summer fight you not heard!yid14 wrote:well he better come out, surely there gonna drag another no-hope european with a padded record over for him soon.tommo100 wrote:cleverley is hiding behind the sofa now!
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
I've heard Hopkins turned down Frank's very generous offer, which hasn't actually been offered, already, so it's on hold. Who'd have thunk itleforge wrote: Its Hopkins in big summer fight you not heard!
Last edited by states on 27 Apr 2012, 18:03, edited 1 time in total.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17106
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
That's what's wrong with our sport right there. a guy who is 1-10 is allowed in the ring with a hot prospect. The BBBofC should be ashamed.
-
ShadrachSimmo
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4738
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
Dan naylor had never been stopped and by his own admission colquhoun had never stopped anyone pro or am.keithmoonhangover wrote:That's what's wrong with our sport right there. a guy who is 1-10 is allowed in the ring with a hot prospect. The BBBofC should be ashamed.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17106
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
I know that mate. But that's ten defeats on the bounce. Don't you think the BBBofC have a duty to only sanction more even fights.ShadrachSimmo wrote:Dan naylor had never been stopped and by his own admission colquhoun had never stopped anyone pro or am.keithmoonhangover wrote:That's what's wrong with our sport right there. a guy who is 1-10 is allowed in the ring with a hot prospect. The BBBofC should be ashamed.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17106
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
And now we have a 3-78 fighter. It's wrong.
-
ShadrachSimmo
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4738
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
Whats wrong? You need journeyman in boxing. Young fighters have to learn their trade. Going straight in with fellow novices or champions doesnt give you that.keithmoonhangover wrote:And now we have a 3-78 fighter. It's wrong.
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
oi watch your mouth that's one of ourskeithmoonhangover wrote:And now we have a 3-78 fighter. It's wrong.
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
There's journeymen and then there's punching bags though. I don't know what you learn in a fight you're guaranteed to win that you can't learn in sparring.ShadrachSimmo wrote:Whats wrong? You need journeyman in boxing. Young fighters have to learn their trade. Going straight in with fellow novices or champions doesnt give you that.keithmoonhangover wrote:And now we have a 3-78 fighter. It's wrong.
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
keithmoonhangover wrote:And now we have a 3-78 fighter. It's wrong.
it`s a living mate,he`ll be happy picking up his £700 and looking forward to fighting again in a few weeks,providing he`s healthy,i don`t see anything wrong with it
anyone can pick up a pro license as long as you pass the medical and ar`nt an axe murderer
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17106
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
That's not the point. If Greaves loses this one, it's 25 loses on the bounce. A prospect learning should not be the reason for this fight being made.ShadrachSimmo wrote:Whats wrong? You need journeyman in boxing. Young fighters have to learn their trade. Going straight in with fellow novices or champions doesnt give you that.keithmoonhangover wrote:And now we have a 3-78 fighter. It's wrong.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17106
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
yid14 wrote:oi watch your mouth that's one of ourskeithmoonhangover wrote:And now we have a 3-78 fighter. It's wrong.
Hello mate. How/where are you?
-
ShadrachSimmo
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4738
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
Getting the rounds in in a pro fight is what is important. We know journeyman are expected to lose.states wrote:There's journeymen and then there's punching bags though. I don't know what you learn in a fight you're guaranteed to win that you can't learn in sparring.ShadrachSimmo wrote:Whats wrong? You need journeyman in boxing. Young fighters have to learn their trade. Going straight in with fellow novices or champions doesnt give you that.keithmoonhangover wrote:And now we have a 3-78 fighter. It's wrong.
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
What happened to Watson vs Cook and Thompson vs Corcoran?
Why are Sky showing this low level rubbish?
Why are Sky showing this low level rubbish?
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
Hello mate, still in Auckland and allgood.keithmoonhangover wrote:yid14 wrote:oi watch your mouth that's one of ourskeithmoonhangover wrote:And now we have a 3-78 fighter. It's wrong.![]()
Hello mate. How/where are you?
Hope all's well with you and yours.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17106
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
I agree Horse.Horse wrote:What happened to Watson vs Cook and Thompson vs Corcoran?
Why are Sky showing this low level rubbish?
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
Wow that's abit of a turn-up.Casio wrote:Cook pulled out of the fight last week so Watson ended up fighting Darren Hamilton and Hamilton won 77-76 on points.keithmoonhangover wrote:I agree Horse.Horse wrote:What happened to Watson vs Cook and Thompson vs Corcoran?
Why are Sky showing this low level rubbish?
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
That was a poor show.
I hope Hearn is going to be offering better than that in the future with their new Sky deal.
I hope Hearn is going to be offering better than that in the future with their new Sky deal.
-
Alexey Uralets
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 121
- Joined: 05 Feb 2012, 08:36
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
Bellew was really good. Defo i wanna see Bellew-Cleverly rematch.
-
Tommy Gunn13
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3290
- Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 13:11
Re: McIntosh v Bellew Betting thread.
One live fight do you mean???Horse wrote:That was a poor show.
I hope Hearn is going to be offering better than that in the future with their new Sky deal.
Pehaps this is the way forward now Pretty Boy Hearn has control.. I know it was a Coldwell show,but poor Dave didnt even get a LIVE word on Tv........