That's cool mate, we'll just have to agree to disagree. I do think 'Smith Promotions' would get the same number of sales or more if they were marketed more effectively.kingfinn wrote:Respectfully disagree with your points - Would Smith Promotions get the same number of sales as Hatton Promotions if they had identical fighters?
How long were grilling machines about until George Foremans name was attached to them? the sales are incomparible.
Frampton is known because he is linked to barry m's name.
As I mentioned previously, I don't think the Foreman comparison is valid - if Hatton was marketing/promoting a weight-loss product, for example, that he'd had remarkable results with, I might be more inclined to agree, as there's far greater potential to have him intrinsically linked to the brand.
For me, it comes back to the same point and that's the unescapable fact that despite the fact it's been operating for a few years now, you can't point to anything to indicate HP has been a success in business terms. It's not like the company has only just launched and this is a new concept, the proof is already out there for everyone to see...