allegedly repeat broadcast - on demand or repeat?

Post Reply
johnswan1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3348
Joined: 27 Feb 2005, 18:03

allegedly repeat broadcast - on demand or repeat?

Post by johnswan1 »

I have not ordered allegedly before but want to for this fight, although I want to get up in the morning to watch it. Can anybody confirm if it will be available on demand or will it be a scheduled repeat broadcast, and what time will it be repeated or made available on demand?
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Allegedly channel repeat broadcast - on demand or repeat?

Post by Final round »

repeated at 10 tomorrow morning
JC
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4579
Joined: 07 Jan 2004, 13:04

Re: Allegedly channel repeat broadcast - on demand or repeat?

Post by JC »

Just watched the repeat of Mayweather/Cotto disappointed it wasn't followed by Alvarez/Mosely repeat. Anyone know if they are showing that one again today?
Kilburn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6697
Joined: 25 Jul 2002, 07:27

Re: Allegedly channel repeat broadcast - on demand or repeat?

Post by Kilburn »

I can't see me ever wanting to watch a repeat showing of the main event to be honest. That commentary was disgustingly biased from Sheridan and his bell end accomplice.

I'm pretty sure Merchant & co would have been calling it right.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Allegedly channel repeat broadcast - on demand or repeat?

Post by whiskey »

Benny Ricardo does the HBO commentary for international customers - and he was absolutely and utterly appalling. The stick I've read for the muppet online is justified.

He never once gave a balanced, even take on the action. His tongue was so far up Floyds arse and he never gave a valiant cotto a single crumb of appreciation.

Utterly wank.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Allegedly channel repeat broadcast - on demand or repeat?

Post by palooka »

G0mez wrote:Benny Ricardo does the HBO commentary for international customers - and he was absolutely and utterly appalling. The stick I've read for the muppet online is justified.

He never once gave a balanced, even take on the action. His tongue was so far up Floyds arse and he never gave a valiant cotto a single crumb of appreciation.Utterly wank.
I agree; Cotto gave Floyd an argument but the commentator made it sound like a Mayweather exhibition. Floyd did very well to stand in range and not move and pot shot but the commentary was not balanced and did not recognise the contribution; to an entertaining bout; that Cotto made. An excellent match up between 2 excellent boxers. Cards too wide and commetary pretty one sided.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Allegedly channel repeat broadcast - on demand or repeat?

Post by leforge »

Kilburn wrote:I can't see me ever wanting to watch a repeat showing of the main event to be honest. That commentary was disgustingly biased from Sheridan and his bell end accomplice.

I'm pretty sure Merchant & co would have been calling it right.
Awful it was!
Gray-Fox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1138
Joined: 22 Apr 2008, 19:33

Re: Allegedly channel repeat broadcast - on demand or repeat?

Post by Gray-Fox »

Kilburn wrote:I can't see me ever wanting to watch a repeat showing of the main event to be honest. That commentary was disgustingly biased from Sheridan and his bell end accomplice.

I'm pretty sure Merchant & co would have been calling it right.
Merchant and Lampley were cheerleading for Cotto...that's not calling it right. Only Steward was talking sense.
dohboy
Cruiserweight
Posts: 85
Joined: 23 Sep 2010, 08:35

Re: Allegedly channel repeat broadcast - on demand or repeat?

Post by dohboy »

Yeah the commentary was absolutely shocking. I ended up having to just turn the sound off
JC
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4579
Joined: 07 Jan 2004, 13:04

Re: Allegedly channel repeat broadcast - on demand or repeat?

Post by JC »

Perfect example of bad commentary pretty much ruining a fight.
Dan Dares
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1584
Joined: 29 Nov 2010, 16:33

Re: Allegedly channel repeat broadcast - on demand or repeat?

Post by Dan Dares »

All boxing channels definitely need to implement a 'I don't want to listen to this c***' button.
Kilburn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6697
Joined: 25 Jul 2002, 07:27

Re: Allegedly channel repeat broadcast - on demand or repeat?

Post by Kilburn »

Gray-Fox wrote:
Kilburn wrote:I can't see me ever wanting to watch a repeat showing of the main event to be honest. That commentary was disgustingly biased from Sheridan and his bell end accomplice.

I'm pretty sure Merchant & co would have been calling it right.
Merchant and Lampley were cheerleading for Cotto...that's not calling it right. Only Steward was talking sense.
I think I'd have found that preferable to the nonsense the ch456 viewers were subjected to last night.
Gray-Fox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1138
Joined: 22 Apr 2008, 19:33

Re: Allegedly channel repeat broadcast - on demand or repeat?

Post by Gray-Fox »

Kilburn wrote:
Gray-Fox wrote:
Kilburn wrote:I can't see me ever wanting to watch a repeat showing of the main event to be honest. That commentary was disgustingly biased from Sheridan and his bell end accomplice.

I'm pretty sure Merchant & co would have been calling it right.
Merchant and Lampley were cheerleading for Cotto...that's not calling it right. Only Steward was talking sense.
I think I'd have found that preferable to the nonsense the ch456 viewers were subjected to last night.
Actually I take it back after watching it past round 4. HBO commentators pretty much called it spot on, and noted that floyd was the clear winner throughout. Steward and Merchant were very balanced.
Post Reply