25 punch combo!!!!!!!!Audley???pull the other oneBIGMARK wrote:Off another forum:
Michael Duberry @Original_Dubes
Audley just beat him in 4th!! Ref stopped fight! A vicious left hook started it and 25 punch combo afterwards ended it!! #Harrison/Adams
Adams Harrison fight footage
-
Final round
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02
Re: Audley-Adams!
-
Palimpsest
- Heavyweight

Re: Audley-Adams!
And the new .....

Got to be Fury next that would be a hoot!!

Got to be Fury next that would be a hoot!!
-
Final round
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02
Re: Audley-Adams!
fozzy wrote:Has the ref got 3 arms
-
Palimpsest
- Heavyweight

Re: Audley-Adams!
You're right never noticed thatfozzy wrote:Has the ref got 3 arms
Last edited by Palimpsest on 26 May 2012, 18:46, edited 1 time in total.
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13361
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Audley-Adams!
On his website he said (before the fight) he wants either Fury, Price, Banks or Seth Mitchell for a July showdown.Palimpsest wrote:And the new .....
Got to be Fury next that would be a hoot!!
-
loaded_gloves
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 1907
- Joined: 09 Mar 2011, 12:18
Re: Audley-Adams!
Seth Mitchell, July, DO IT A-FORCE!!!
Re: Audley-Adams!
As i predicted this would end in the 4th or 5th.BIGMARK wrote:Off another forum:
Michael Duberry @Original_Dubes
Audley just beat him in 4th!! Ref stopped fight! A vicious left hook started it and 25 punch combo afterwards ended it!! #Harrison/Adams
Nice little warm-up fight for Audley and hopefully now either Tyson Fury or David Price next...both fights he's a live underdog as both of them have glass chins.
Re: Audley-Adams!
I think we all made our voices clear about Adams being rubbish and the fight being a mismatch but Steve wasn't having it.TheCobra wrote:I honestly still can't for the life of me think why Goodwin put his hard earned into getting Ali Adams this shot. He just had no chance!
You don't suddenly go from being a guy who was stuggling to beat euro bums to someone who could compete at the top of the domestic scene in the shape of 6 months...infact Adams is probably a journey man whose mouth convinced a few people that he was something more.
Re: Audley-Adams!
Hopefully it'll be Price next for the British title.jameswilson wrote:On his website he said (before the fight) he wants either Fury, Price, Banks or Seth Mitchell for a July showdown.Palimpsest wrote:And the new .....
Got to be Fury next that would be a hoot!!
Re: Audley-Adams!
I like Don Charles as a trainer and a bloke but he doesn't half come out with some nonsense.
Apparently Adams has the best jab in the world.
Apparently Adams has the best jab in the world.
Re: Audley-Adams!
Did he really say that haha well that's the last time i take anything he says seriously.Karl Jade wrote:I like Don Charles as a trainer and a bloke but he doesn't half come out with some nonsense.
Apparently Adams has the best jab in the world.
-
Palimpsest
- Heavyweight

Re: Audley-Adams!
Didn't do him a lot of good tonight did it?Karl Jade wrote:I like Don Charles as a trainer and a bloke but he doesn't half come out with some nonsense.
Apparently Adams has the best jab in the world.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16754
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Audley-Adams!
Will Harrison get David Price next?
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13361
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Audley-Adams!
Rumours a few days back were they were trying to get Price on the Khan undercard. I'd suggest Price gets a lot more out of a fight in Las Vegas on a big undercard than he would from an Audley fight.keithmoonhangover wrote:Will Harrison get David Price next?
If Audley does fight one out of that lot then I'd say Fury would be his best chance of a win (not that I necassarily think he would win) because Fury is the easiest to hit out of all of those guys, and doesn't exactly punch like a train. Just checking boxrec, Jonathan Banks and Seth Mitchell are actually down to fight eachother on the Khan v Garcia undercard haha.
Whether or not Mr Hennessy wants to have an Audley fight is another thing, Audley isn't particularly cheap as we know.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16754
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Audley-Adams!
Fury has one thing in spades that Audley doesn't have..... guts.jameswilson wrote:Rumours a few days back were they were trying to get Price on the Khan undercard. I'd suggest Price gets a lot more out of a fight in Las Vegas on a big undercard than he would from an Audley fight.keithmoonhangover wrote:Will Harrison get David Price next?
If Audley does fight one out of that lot then I'd say Fury would be his best chance of a win (not that I necassarily think he would win) because Fury is the easiest to hit out of all of those guys, and doesn't exactly punch like a train. Just checking boxrec, Jonathan Banks and Seth Mitchell are actually down to fight eachother on the Khan v Garcia undercard haha.
Whether or not Mr Hennessy wants to have an Audley fight is another thing, Audley isn't particularly cheap as we know.
Re: Audley-Adams!
Channel 5 should demand Fury fight Harrison next, the viewing figures would probably be their best ever since the channel started, seriously.
-
frankgreaves
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 142
- Joined: 26 Sep 2010, 08:13
Re: Audley-Adams!
Anyone got the undercard results?? Cheers :-)
Re: Audley-Adams!
Agreed, they could easily get 5 million plus especially if they marketed the fight heavily...the press conference alone would be a classic!The_Don1 wrote:Channel 5 should demand Fury fight Harrison next, the viewing figures would probably be their best ever since the channel started, seriously.
-
Palimpsest
- Heavyweight

Re: Audley-Adams!
Do Harrison's wins Scott Belshaw and Coleman Barrett qualify him to challenge for Fury's Irish title?
-
jameswilson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13361
- Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01
Re: Audley-Adams!
By that definition Audley would have lost most of his fights.keithmoonhangover wrote:Fury has one thing in spades that Audley doesn't have..... guts.jameswilson wrote:Rumours a few days back were they were trying to get Price on the Khan undercard. I'd suggest Price gets a lot more out of a fight in Las Vegas on a big undercard than he would from an Audley fight.keithmoonhangover wrote:Will Harrison get David Price next?
If Audley does fight one out of that lot then I'd say Fury would be his best chance of a win (not that I necassarily think he would win) because Fury is the easiest to hit out of all of those guys, and doesn't exactly punch like a train. Just checking boxrec, Jonathan Banks and Seth Mitchell are actually down to fight eachother on the Khan v Garcia undercard haha.
Whether or not Mr Hennessy wants to have an Audley fight is another thing, Audley isn't particularly cheap as we know.
Re: Audley-Adams!
told you , not taht its a supirise but some were saying adams hahahahaha hes shit
-
loaded_gloves
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 1907
- Joined: 09 Mar 2011, 12:18
Re: Audley-Adams!
Is there anywhere we can see the fight yet?
Re: Audley-Adams!
It should be up on Goodwin s website
-
Syntax Error
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9006
- Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00
Re: Audley-Adams!
It's only turd because you don't agree.jameswilson wrote:Why do you keep spouting this turd? At the time the BBC bailed, they had Hennessy shows (Froch, Eastman and Eesham Pickering) as well as David Haye and Audley. If Audley was the only one not pulling in the audiences they would have just ditched his shows and stuck with the rest. But they didn't because they wanted out of boxing full stop. Thinking about it wasn'tthis around about the time they got Match of the day back? Not only that but when Audley was on he no doubt pulled in bigger audiences than the other guys. I'd bet his fights against Hersisia, Francis and Bonin, say what you like about them, pulled in a bigger audiences than any other boxing on the BBC during that period, even more than Thompson v Haye I reckon, that was obviously shown on a delay.Syntax Error wrote:He is indirectly responsible for killing boxing on the BBC.
If you're complaining about the money he was on for his first 10 fights, I'd love to see you turn down 1million. No doubt you'd say 'Oh no, I don't want a million, I have this real affection towards the people who pay their TV licences I just couldn't possibly accept that.'
I could accuse you of writing spouting this turd too, but I won't.
I don't give a hoot about how much he was paid (& yes, I would have accepted the money); my gripe was with his performances & decreasingly quality in opposition which led to decreasing viewing figures.
OK, you're right, he isn't solely responsible, but he was the so-called headline act & poster boy for boxing on the BBC, hence why I keep spouting the turd (to paraphrase yourself) 'indirectly responsible for killing boxing on the BBC'.
If Harrison's 10 fight contract had panned out better, I believe boxing would still be on the BBC.
Thankfully Channel 5 have picked up the baton, but I would certainly worry if Harrison was ever featured because he has form so to speak.
Last edited by Syntax Error on 27 May 2012, 05:05, edited 1 time in total.