Padded records
-
tagjohnson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 281
- Joined: 14 Jul 2005, 09:56
Padded records
I'm sure this has been discussed before but I wonder which fighters have the distinction of fighting the most creampuffs along the way. Sean O'Grady comes to mind.
-
The Great John L
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4351
- Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37
-
tiredoldngrey
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 442
- Joined: 23 May 2005, 12:36
padded records
Hector "Macho" Camacho comes to mind. I really feel he was a wasted talent. Although I liked him, every time he stepped in with a top fighter, he lost - Greg Haugen, JC Chavez, Felix Trinidad, DLH.
-
Richie Aprille rules
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 89
- Joined: 06 Dec 2003, 14:18
Re: padded records
He fought Trinidad and DLH at WW, past his prime and past his weight. And he defeated Ramirez and Rosario, top fighters without a doubt.wlvrne wrote:Hector "Macho" Camacho comes to mind. I really feel he was a wasted talent. Although I liked him, every time he stepped in with a top fighter, he lost - Greg Haugen, JC Chavez, Felix Trinidad, DLH.
Re: padded records
That's 2 outta how many Camacho has fought?Richie Aprille rules wrote:He fought Trinidad and DLH at WW, past his prime and past his weight. And he defeated Ramirez and Rosario, top fighters without a doubt.wlvrne wrote:Hector "Macho" Camacho comes to mind. I really feel he was a wasted talent. Although I liked him, every time he stepped in with a top fighter, he lost - Greg Haugen, JC Chavez, Felix Trinidad, DLH.
-
Richie Aprille rules
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 89
- Joined: 06 Dec 2003, 14:18
Re: padded records
He beat Haugen, Boza-Edwards, Howard Davis Jr, Pazienza... I don't regard his as a "brilliant" record, but I don't consider it "padded" at all. And truth is, Chavez is highly appraised by his win against Rosario in '87, and Camacho had beaten Rosario before. I'm not saying that Camacho is greater than Chavez, that would be absurd, and in fact I don't even like Camacho's style, but I don't think his is a "padded" record.wlvrne wrote:That's 2 outta how many Camacho has fought?Richie Aprille rules wrote:He fought Trinidad and DLH at WW, past his prime and past his weight. And he defeated Ramirez and Rosario, top fighters without a doubt.wlvrne wrote:Hector "Macho" Camacho comes to mind. I really feel he was a wasted talent. Although I liked him, every time he stepped in with a top fighter, he lost - Greg Haugen, JC Chavez, Felix Trinidad, DLH.
padded records
OK, maybe not EXACTLY padded, but ya gotta admit, Camacho could have fought tougher opponents. He chose fighters he knew he could outbox....how's that?
-
tagjohnson
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 281
- Joined: 14 Jul 2005, 09:56
Some interesting responses
Although I never would have thought about Butterbean since I always thought of him as an act more than anything. I thought of Duane Bobick perhaps. The biggest win on his 38 and 0 record going into the Norton was against Scott Ledoux! Greg Page had a streak of nine 1st round ko's in the late nineties; six of his opponents were winless and the other three had losing records, and really bad losing records including 14 and 78. Correct me if I'm wrong but the first well known American woman boxer Cathy Davis never FOUGHT anyone with a win, let alone a winning record.
Good points. However Greg was just trying to stay in the game, he wasn't padding he was just hangin in there. His time had long since come and gone.
Now Butterbean talk about padding, not to mention he fights nobodies.
Camacho may have been practicing "opponent management" like I said he probably qualifies for some padding. But I think he fought pretty routinely and ultimately mixed it up with some greats. Not always coming out on top but he got in there. His problem is that since he chose the name Macho so he's got a lot to live up to.
Now Butterbean talk about padding, not to mention he fights nobodies.
Camacho may have been practicing "opponent management" like I said he probably qualifies for some padding. But I think he fought pretty routinely and ultimately mixed it up with some greats. Not always coming out on top but he got in there. His problem is that since he chose the name Macho so he's got a lot to live up to.
-
BrocktonBlockbuster49
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4900
- Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32
Hey BB you may be right about Yori boy, or it may have been he was fighting a lot of locals and wanting to be active until he reached a certain threshold. I'd do some research on that one. Sometimes fighters can't get the fights they would like because no one wants to fight them. So they take what they can get. Yori being much better than average had very good luck on the way up. He also liked to keep an upcoming fight on his "to do" list.
As I recall Yori was considered a threat and not given his due but I can't recall a time where people were using the word "duck" around him. I think he also took the big fights when they were offered. Problem was they werent offered until it was figured he was ready to be sacrificed.
Some of my history on him is sketchy but I think I've got the theme about right.
When I think of the definition in this case of "padded record" I think of it willfully being done in order to make a big money fight and then running with the dough. Yori was a genuine working fighter, almost clubfighter mentality. I don't think there was much about him that was phoney. I hope I'm not making too big of a deal over symantics on this one.
As I recall Yori was considered a threat and not given his due but I can't recall a time where people were using the word "duck" around him. I think he also took the big fights when they were offered. Problem was they werent offered until it was figured he was ready to be sacrificed.
Some of my history on him is sketchy but I think I've got the theme about right.
When I think of the definition in this case of "padded record" I think of it willfully being done in order to make a big money fight and then running with the dough. Yori was a genuine working fighter, almost clubfighter mentality. I don't think there was much about him that was phoney. I hope I'm not making too big of a deal over symantics on this one.