Chris Eubank Sr hints at ring comeback

keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17105
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Chris Eubank Sr hints at ring comeback

Post by keithmoonhangover »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
MachoMan09 wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:The trouble with this 'masters boxing' idea is that you have ageining, past their best, and not neccessarily very fit men hitting one another in earnest. It's a crap idea.
It's a crap idea if you put it on television.
It's a crap idea even if not. It's asking for trouble to have old inactive fighters laying into one another. The trouble is, that highly trained fighters even at an advanced age, know how to punch with serious power, against older opponents, that could lead to a fatality or serious injury.

In addition, some old boxers are going to be much better physically than others due to lifestyle, genetics etc.

Boxing is a young man's game, the exceptions, by their rarity, like Foreman and Hopkins, just prove how much this is the case.
James..... Did you watch Fenech - Nelson III?
Adamj1987
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5400
Joined: 14 Oct 2008, 16:16

Re: Chris Eubank Sr hints at ring comeback

Post by Adamj1987 »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
MachoMan09 wrote: It's a crap idea if you put it on television.
It's a crap idea even if not. It's asking for trouble to have old inactive fighters laying into one another. The trouble is, that highly trained fighters even at an advanced age, know how to punch with serious power, against older opponents, that could lead to a fatality or serious injury.

In addition, some old boxers are going to be much better physically than others due to lifestyle, genetics etc.

Boxing is a young man's game, the exceptions, by their rarity, like Foreman and Hopkins, just prove how much this is the case.
James..... Did you watch Fenech - Nelson III?
Case closed
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17105
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Chris Eubank Sr hints at ring comeback

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Adamj1987 wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote: It's a crap idea even if not. It's asking for trouble to have old inactive fighters laying into one another. The trouble is, that highly trained fighters even at an advanced age, know how to punch with serious power, against older opponents, that could lead to a fatality or serious injury.

In addition, some old boxers are going to be much better physically than others due to lifestyle, genetics etc.

Boxing is a young man's game, the exceptions, by their rarity, like Foreman and Hopkins, just prove how much this is the case.
James..... Did you watch Fenech - Nelson III?
Case closed
Hey, it was a pretty good fight.
tear up
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1832
Joined: 06 Dec 2010, 12:25

Re: Chris Eubank Sr hints at ring comeback

Post by tear up »

Ha like the look of Eubanks junior in the sun today his face says it all daddy takin the lime light from me ha but I would love to see him have another go :box:
coghaugen11
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2595
Joined: 29 Aug 2008, 11:59

Re: Chris Eubank Sr hints at ring comeback

Post by coghaugen11 »

Let him knock out Jones after a pose fest
JC
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4579
Joined: 07 Jan 2004, 13:04

Re: Chris Eubank Sr hints at ring comeback

Post by JC »

I just don't get the appeal of this idea, can't see any way it wouldn't be depressing.

Anyway I can't see Benn wanting to make a come back, isn't he a preacher somewhere abroad now? He seems to have moved on.
Pugilist-specialist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1632
Joined: 11 Jul 2008, 04:37

Re: Chris Eubank Sr hints at ring comeback

Post by Pugilist-specialist »

coghaugen11 wrote:Rumour has it he looked really good in sparring against Montell Griffin in Top Rank Gym a few years ago. Who knows
Rumour has it that you start a lot of false rumours on here.
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9025
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: Chris Eubank Sr hints at ring comeback

Post by Syntax Error »

I think Eubank is trying to keep his name up in lights because he is yesterday's man & his son is now the Eubank we all talk about.

I'm sure he's missing the limelight, but I doubt he is serious about coming back.

I'd love to know what Benn thinks.

On the one hand, looking at Benn these days, he's well out of boxing, but mention the name Chris Eubank to him & I could almost imagine the demonic stare of his & him running straight back to the gym to get into fighting shape to fight his old nemesis.
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5462
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Chris Eubank Sr hints at ring comeback

Post by forcefraser »

I`d take old Eubank to beat Bute easily and then school Froch in a 12 round mince up.

He might be 45, but he is still hard as nails. I think he could beat Ward and maybe even Vitali, if he put on a few pounds.
fatcity69
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 419
Joined: 11 May 2008, 16:18

Re: Chris Eubank Sr hints at ring comeback

Post by fatcity69 »

forcefraser wrote:I`d take old Eubank to beat Bute easily and then school Froch in a 12 round mince up.

He might be 45, but he is still hard as nails. I think he could beat Ward and maybe even Vitali, if he put on a few pounds.
On fight night 4 perhaps, but not in the real world!....
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: Chris Eubank Sr hints at ring comeback

Post by Finn »

fatcity69 wrote:
forcefraser wrote:I`d take old Eubank to beat Bute easily and then school Froch in a 12 round mince up.

He might be 45, but he is still hard as nails. I think he could beat Ward and maybe even Vitali, if he put on a few pounds.
On fight night 4 perhaps, but not in the real world!....
:lol:
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9025
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: Chris Eubank Sr hints at ring comeback

Post by Syntax Error »

forcefraser wrote:I`d take old Eubank to beat Bute easily and then school Froch in a 12 round mince up.

He might be 45, but he is still hard as nails. I think he could beat Ward and maybe even Vitali, if he put on a few pounds.
I think he'd beat Jake LaMotta too. :OhYes: :TU:
Khaosai-Galaxy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2739
Joined: 29 Apr 2007, 12:15

Re: Chris Eubank Sr hints at ring comeback

Post by Khaosai-Galaxy »

MachoMan09 wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
MachoMan09 wrote: It's a crap idea if you put it on television.
It's a crap idea even if not. It's asking for trouble to have old inactive fighters laying into one another. The trouble is, that highly trained fighters even at an advanced age, know how to punch with serious power, against older opponents, that could lead to a fatality or serious injury.

In addition, some old boxers are going to be much better physically than others due to lifestyle, genetics etc.

Boxing is a young man's game, the exceptions, by their rarity, like Foreman and Hopkins, just prove how much this is the case.
At the very highest level, all sports that require serious levels of strength, power and fitness are the preserve of young men (granted there are a handful of exceptions) with superior genetics/hours of training/talent/etc. But beneath the highest level, any sport worth a lick has numerous levels below that where those who are not, for whatever reason - within the boundaries of physical and mental capability - of the calibre to participate in that top tier can still take part. I don't see why boxing should be any different.

Gauging any significant disparity in ability between one 50-year-old and other is no more complicated that doing the same with a pair of junior amateurs. If one is clearly more capable than the other, they should not be matched.

I don't see what the difference is between 50-year-old veterans strolling round a rugby pitch and 50-year-old veterans strolling round a boxing ring. Both sports carry an inherent physical risk (rugby more so I'd argue) but so do lots of things, why shouldn't blokes who still want to take part have the opportunity?

Ok, what about 80 year old people playing rugby/boxing?

Once again Macho, you fail to take your well reasoned point to a ludicrous conclusion.
Post Reply