billy " the kid " dib
billy " the kid " dib
Billy " the kid " dib vs Juan Antonio " el mozo " Rodriguez
Re: billy " the kid " dib
I hope this isn't a 'world title' defense, Rodriguez would struggle to be in the mexican top 10 let alone the world top 10. I think it's time they unwrapped him from the cotton wool.
Re: billy " the kid " dib
I was expecting someone abit better than that, he might be a tough Mexican bit hasn't got a strong resume..
Re: billy " the kid " dib
a 'bit' better? it's a complete mis-match.rooster69 wrote:I was expecting someone abit better than that, he might be a tough Mexican bit hasn't got a strong resume..
Re: billy " the kid " dib
Where did the story come from? Rodriguez is a super feather with a 21-3 (19KO) record.rooster69 wrote:I was expecting someone abit better than that, he might be a tough Mexican bit hasn't got a strong resume..
Re: billy " the kid " dib
that's a friday maybe that's why they got a roadsweeper in.hearns wrote:July 13th
Re: billy " the kid " dib
Escobedo was his mandatory only three months ago. As champion he is entitled to take a non mandatory challenge.
Re: billy " the kid " dib
But what right does this guy have to challenge for a version of the world title? Surely a mandatory challenger has be in the top 50 in the world.Brute wrote:Escobedo was his mandatory only three months ago. As champion he is entitled to take a non mandatory challenge.
Re: billy " the kid " dib
Go tell a pro boxer with 19 KOs to his name that he is a road sweeper. You could do with a good hiding.yid14 wrote:that's a friday maybe that's why they got a roadsweeper in.hearns wrote:July 13th
Re: billy " the kid " dib
It is not a mandatory. Escobedo won an IBF eliminator to fight him so he was a mandatory. He can have an easier fight now.yid14 wrote:But what right does this guy have to challenge for a version of the world title? Surely a mandatory challenger has be in the top 50 in the world.Brute wrote:Escobedo was his mandatory only three months ago. As champion he is entitled to take a non mandatory challenge.
Re: billy " the kid " dib
I take it you've never heard the term 'mexican roadsweeper'? Just look down Dib's record. He could start a cleaning agency with it.Brute wrote:Go tell a pro boxer with 19 KOs to his name that he is a road sweeper. You could do with a good hiding.yid14 wrote:that's a friday maybe that's why they got a roadsweeper in.hearns wrote:July 13th
Re: billy " the kid " dib
I mean't to write voluntary. Like I said there's no way this should be classed as a world title defence.Brute wrote:It is not a mandatory. Escobedo won an IBF eliminator to fight him so he was a mandatory. He can have an easier fight now.yid14 wrote:But what right does this guy have to challenge for a version of the world title? Surely a mandatory challenger has be in the top 50 in the world.Brute wrote:Escobedo was his mandatory only three months ago. As champion he is entitled to take a non mandatory challenge.
Re: billy " the kid " dib
Brute, you are excited about this fight?Brute wrote:Escobedo was his mandatory only three months ago. As champion he is entitled to take a non mandatory challenge.
Re: billy " the kid " dib
Did Joe Louis fight a no 1 or 2 contender every time he defended his title? No. People are whining about Dib not fighting enough now they whine about him keeping busy defending his title twice in four months. Make your minds up! The WBA has three Super World Featherweight champions and they have to find contenders to make title defences against too. It is a division crowded with champions.yid14 wrote:I mean't to write voluntary. Like I said there's no way this should be classed as a world title defence.Brute wrote:It is not a mandatory. Escobedo won an IBF eliminator to fight him so he was a mandatory. He can have an easier fight now.yid14 wrote:But what right does this guy have to challenge for a version of the world title? Surely a mandatory challenger has be in the top 50 in the world.
Re: billy " the kid " dib
If it's a keep busy fight then it should be a non-title 10 rounder. Calling this a world title fight is putting boxing in a bad light and conning the public.Brute wrote:Did Joe Louis fight a no 1 or 2 contender every time he defended his title? No. People are whining about Dib not fighting enough now they whine about him keeping busy defending his title twice in four months. Make your minds up! The WBA has three Super World Featherweight champions and they have to find contenders to make title defences against too. It is a division crowded with champions.yid14 wrote:I mean't to write voluntary. Like I said there's no way this should be classed as a world title defence.Brute wrote: It is not a mandatory. Escobedo won an IBF eliminator to fight him so he was a mandatory. He can have an easier fight now.
Re: billy " the kid " dib
About as excited as I was about Henry Cooper constantly ducking George Chuvalo when George was the only real contender for Henry's Empire title. Why?Giancarlo wrote:Brute, you are excited about this fight?Brute wrote:Escobedo was his mandatory only three months ago. As champion he is entitled to take a non mandatory challenge.
Re: billy " the kid " dib
No way this can be a TITLE defense.
Re: billy " the kid " dib
Horse shit! The Klitschko brothers defend their titles every time they go into the ring regardless of who they are fighting, don't they?yid14 wrote:If it's a keep busy fight then it should be a non-title 10 rounder. Calling this a world title fight is putting boxing in a bad light and conning the public.Brute wrote:Did Joe Louis fight a no 1 or 2 contender every time he defended his title? No. People are whining about Dib not fighting enough now they whine about him keeping busy defending his title twice in four months. Make your minds up! The WBA has three Super World Featherweight champions and they have to find contenders to make title defences against too. It is a division crowded with champions.yid14 wrote: I mean't to write voluntary. Like I said there's no way this should be classed as a world title defence.
Re: billy " the kid " dib
According to that report it is, I think Brute's trying to get a seat on the IBF's commitee table in between Stevie wonder and David Blunkett.hearns wrote:No way this can be a TITLE defense.
Re: billy " the kid " dib
yid14 wrote:According to that report it is, I think Brute's trying to get a seat on the IBF's commitee table in between Stevie wonder and David Blunkett.hearns wrote:No way this can be a TITLE defense.
I just think it's unusual to defend a title against a boxer ranked 84 in the world let alone against a fighter without an IBF ranking.
But i have been wwwwrong plenty of times before
Re: billy " the kid " dib
Of coarse it's rubbish but sadly this is modern day boxing.hearns wrote:yid14 wrote:According to that report it is, I think Brute's trying to get a seat on the IBF's commitee table in between Stevie wonder and David Blunkett.hearns wrote:No way this can be a TITLE defense.
I just think it's unusual to defend a title against a boxer ranked 84 in the world let alone against a fighter without an IBF ranking.
But i have been wwwwrong plenty of times before
Re: billy " the kid " dib
Twice Lennox Lewis defended his title against fighters who were not supposed to have a chance and got KOed. There is always a chance.yid14 wrote:According to that report it is, I think Brute's trying to get a seat on the IBF's commitee table in between Stevie wonder and David Blunkett.hearns wrote:No way this can be a TITLE defense.