Towers fight
Towers fight
Round 5- wow- if Towers was the "away" fighter we can guarantee it would have been stopped!
Re: Towers fight
Shocking fight...they looked like a couple of drunks at closing time. Really not impressed with Towers.
Re: Towers fight
Even many hometown refs would've stopped it in the fifth; Towers was getting thrashed.
Re: Towers fight
I've never been impressed with Towers. He is too raw.
Re: Towers fight
Any thought of Towers as an opponent for David Price, Tyson Fury etc, should be dismissed right now.
-
righthook
- Heavyweight

Re: Towers fight
Funniest thing iv ever seen. I couldn't stop laughin all the way through the fight, from the 2 fighters to the shocking referee. Pure entertainment although for the wrong reasons 
-
ShadrachSimmo
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4738
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42
Re: Towers fight
Easy. They weren't that refined. Towers should have been stopped. Pish.milpool wrote:Shocking fight...they looked like a couple of drunks at closing time. Really not impressed with Towers.
Re: Towers fight
Told you towers was crap
Re: Towers fight
Told you towers was crap 8)
Re: Towers fight
Good fight.
I want to see Towers vs Dallas next.
I want to see Towers vs Dallas next.
Re: Towers fight
i think Towers will fight Price next unbeaton fighter with a good record who's no where near and will never be ready he's the perfect choice
Re: Towers fight
I remember Tony from prizefighter, wasn't impressed then. He needs to review the team in his corner after the chaos last night.
Would be easy to knock Towers if he wasn't realistic himself, but he appears to a very balanced bloke (apart from in round 5 of course).
Would be easy to knock Towers if he wasn't realistic himself, but he appears to a very balanced bloke (apart from in round 5 of course).
Re: Towers fight
the fight was no ali-frazier but couldnt take my eyes off it, the referee was nothing short of shocking missing the knockdown and could of stopped it had he bothered to look at towers rolling around like bambi on ice and how many knockdowns does he need to see before stopping tony, tonys corner was terrible too, glad towers come through hope he has learned from the fight and will be interesting to see how he faires next time out.
Re: Towers fight
big learning curve for bit richie last night, but you dont hear him spouting off saying he is the second coming etc, he is level headed and is in the game to learn and progress.
should the fight have been stopped in the 5th?.......yes, it should. but there was a clown in the middle, was he from luxembourg?.....
should the fight have been stopped in the 5th?.......yes, it should. but there was a clown in the middle, was he from luxembourg?.....
Re: Towers fight
Good to see Pele Reid back.
Re: Towers fight
I'd agree with a lot of that and also what was said above - it's hard to slag the kid when he's so down to earth and realistic in any event.MachoMan09 wrote:To be fair to Towers, he is what he is i.e. a big, strong Johnny come lately. Seldom do guys in their 30s take up sports with a sizeable technical requirement and go on to do exceptionally well. I don't think anyone has suggested that Towers would be one of the exceptions. By backing-up his natural physical attributes and tenacity with some technique taught by the Ingles, he has the scope to earn a few quid on the circuit and perhaps one day challenge for the British title should his stars line-up. Not bad.
Admittedly i'm biased but i think that fight did not show Rich to his true potential and he'll come back and look a LOT better than that in future. We've seen enough from his sparring with Fury and Chisora to know he's better than that. He realy did look excellent against both.
Technically, as Ian texted me, he needs to use his jab a lot better coz he does have one but you'd be forgiven for not thinking he did on last night's evidence.
He took a hard shot to the top of the head and he lost his balance and orientation. Interestingly, at the end of round four he was saying to Dom 'what's wrong with me' so perhaps for whatever reason it was just one of those bad nights at the office.
But there were also some plus points. First, massive heart to come back from being out on his feet to win. Second, he must be banging pretty hard when the round straight after he nearly gets KO'd the opponent (who'd only ever lost to Perez and Helenius) wants out the match.
Re: Towers fight
I must have been drunk when I first watched Towers as I remember thinking he looked quite good.
I wish the guy all the best but judging by last night it'll be a miracle if he wins the British title down the line.
I wish the guy all the best but judging by last night it'll be a miracle if he wins the British title down the line.
Re: Towers fight
Good summary, hombre.MachoMan09 wrote:To be fair to Towers, he is what he is i.e. a big, strong Johnny come lately. Seldom do guys in their 30s take up sports with a sizeable technical requirement and go on to do exceptionally well. I don't think anyone has suggested that Towers would be one of the exceptions. By backing-up his natural physical attributes and tenacity with some technique taught by the Ingles, he has the scope to earn a few quid on the circuit and perhaps one day challenge for the British title should his stars line-up. Not bad.
Re: Towers fight
I THINK YOULL FIND HE DID NOT START" BOXING IN HIS 30S" AT ALL, I REMEMBER SEEING HIM TEN YEAR AGO IN THE AMATEUR SCENE, GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT
Re: Towers fight
Towers is there for the taking he seems like a hummble enough chap but now he has a belt to defend he will get caught out fairly quickly, imo he has the most padded record out of the british heaveyweight's at the moment,
Re: Towers fight
Would enjoy Towers vs Dillian Whyte. Both raw but powerful.
-
Bennyblanco
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 967
- Joined: 19 Jul 2009, 05:01
Re: Towers fight
Would like to see that, like the look of whyteJamesH wrote:Would enjoy Towers vs Dillian Whyte. Both raw but powerful.
Towers got stood on his head by Anthony Joshua in sparring
Re: Towers fight
That was a terrible fight. Period.
Towers should've been stopped in the fifth round; he was gone. What's worse is that the ref waded in and rescued him three or four times before waving the fight on. If that'd happened in a German ring there'd - quite rightly - be an uproar.
From there it became farcical. Towers spent the next four rounds finding it impossible to figure out a way to beat a guy who, to all extents and purposes, was had decided that he wanted to be stopped.
Hardly a great advert for boxing IMO.
The first technically proficient/remotely ambitious bloke who Towers fights puts him away inside three rounds. A Dallas fight or Prizefighter entry may be a guilty pleasure though.
Towers should've been stopped in the fifth round; he was gone. What's worse is that the ref waded in and rescued him three or four times before waving the fight on. If that'd happened in a German ring there'd - quite rightly - be an uproar.
From there it became farcical. Towers spent the next four rounds finding it impossible to figure out a way to beat a guy who, to all extents and purposes, was had decided that he wanted to be stopped.
Hardly a great advert for boxing IMO.
The first technically proficient/remotely ambitious bloke who Towers fights puts him away inside three rounds. A Dallas fight or Prizefighter entry may be a guilty pleasure though.
Re: Towers fight
which prison was that in?the truth wrote:I THINK YOULL FIND HE DID NOT START" BOXING IN HIS 30S" AT ALL, I REMEMBER SEEING HIM TEN YEAR AGO IN THE AMATEUR SCENE, GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT
Re: Towers fight
That's right - he did a little bit though not sure how much and then about ten years out. So he's starting again, really.the truth wrote:I THINK YOULL FIND HE DID NOT START" BOXING IN HIS 30S" AT ALL, I REMEMBER SEEING HIM TEN YEAR AGO IN THE AMATEUR SCENE, GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT