Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill

xrgcx
Cruiserweight
Posts: 222
Joined: 07 May 2011, 07:42

Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill

Post by xrgcx »

This bill is just beyond a joke.
milpool
Cruiserweight
Posts: 5402
Joined: 18 May 2011, 13:38

Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill

Post by milpool »

Shame...was looking forward to witnessing that one.
JamesH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1897
Joined: 08 Aug 2008, 09:16

Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill

Post by JamesH »

Honestly couldn't see this one happening on this card.
tear up
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1832
Joined: 06 Dec 2010, 12:25

Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill

Post by tear up »

You not think warren has just pulled the Plug on this fight as so many ticket have been sold ie short changed the fans but people r really only going to see the main fight
T.M.K
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 679
Joined: 15 Feb 2006, 18:28

Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill

Post by T.M.K »

Well the reasoning seems highly eyebrow-raising...........

But what's done is done.

:-)
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill

Post by Final round »

I'd be surprised if many of the 'clientele' were excited for this fight anyhow.
hitman_hatton1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6150
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57

Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill

Post by hitman_hatton1 »

30,000 tickets sold and the cheapskate can't even put together a few solid match ups on.

same old same old from fish eyes.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill

Post by leforge »

Final round wrote:I'd be surprised if many of the 'clientele' were excited for this fight anyhow.
I am expecting more fighting out of the ring than in it that night!
smoggy7188
Cruiserweight
Posts: 941
Joined: 27 Oct 2010, 12:27

Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill

Post by smoggy7188 »

"Long List" of undercard fights announced on bunce show tonight apparently.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill

Post by leforge »

smoggy7188 wrote:"Long List" of undercard fights announced on bunce show tonight apparently.
Be nothing good!
smoggy7188
Cruiserweight
Posts: 941
Joined: 27 Oct 2010, 12:27

Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill

Post by smoggy7188 »

Its a Klitshcko style card. Massive top of the bill and loads of fillers. Hall/o'Sullivan is a good fight.
oliverfennell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5564
Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37

Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill

Post by oliverfennell »

smoggy7188 wrote:Its a Klitshcko style card. Massive top of the bill and loads of fillers. Hall/o'Sullivan is a good fight.
Is there a link detailing the undercard anywhere, since BoxRec still won't detail it?
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill

Post by Final round »

oliverfennell wrote:
smoggy7188 wrote:Its a Klitshcko style card. Massive top of the bill and loads of fillers. Hall/o'Sullivan is a good fight.
Is there a link detailing the undercard anywhere, since BoxRec still won't detail it?

Even Boxing Monthly are on it! Two months running

Image
loaded_gloves
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1907
Joined: 09 Mar 2011, 12:18

Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill

Post by loaded_gloves »

Ergh. Povetkin is a more offensive 'champion' than John Ruiz. What is Hasim Rahman doing in a world title fight?

The WBA's crimes these last decade are off the chart. They need to be lined up against a wall and shot.
Londonirish
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3064
Joined: 20 Nov 2008, 13:02

Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill

Post by Londonirish »

Does any one what the Under card is? who's Fighting?
earsjohn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1691
Joined: 02 Sep 2006, 14:34

Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill

Post by earsjohn »

Was this fight ever really on the bill?

I don't recall seeing either Povetkin or Rahman in any press conference and despite the almost daily outpourings of information from Warren Towers, I don't recall anything other than the announcement of the fight.

It would add nothing to ticket sales - the numbers travelling from Russia/Germany and the US to watch these two could be counted on the fingers of a one-armed man, while the costs of having them on the undercard would have made a huge dent in the fight revenues. Much better to have the fight in Germany and show it on the channel for the cost of rights only.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill

Post by leforge »

earsjohn wrote:Was this fight ever really on the bill?

I don't recall seeing either Povetkin or Rahman in any press conference and despite the almost daily outpourings of information from Warren Towers, I don't recall anything other than the announcement of the fight.

It would add nothing to ticket sales - the numbers travelling from Russia/Germany and the US to watch these two could be counted on the fingers of a one-armed man, while the costs of having them on the undercard would have made a huge dent in the fight revenues. Much better to have the fight in Germany and show it on the channel for the cost of rights only.
Spot on was it ever on but they still told fans its on not good enough! But as ARD not broadcasting will all the cost of the live prodcution now be footed by allegedly.
smoggy7188
Cruiserweight
Posts: 941
Joined: 27 Oct 2010, 12:27

Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill

Post by smoggy7188 »

Ronnie Heffron and Bradley Saunders added to bill.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill

Post by leforge »

smoggy7188 wrote:Ronnie Heffron and Bradley Saunders added to bill.
Against no ones either.
Tunney
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 274
Joined: 21 Jun 2007, 22:16

Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill

Post by Tunney »

No great loss.

I don't care about this Rahman-Povetkin fight, even though I'm a heavyweight fan. Rahman hasn't had a decent win in 7 years. The WBA is a disgrace for making him the mandatory.

I hope Sauerland, with their roster of talented up-and-comers (like Dirks, Masternak, Pulev, Gerber, Woge, etc.) puts on a decent undercard in Hamburg.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17105
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill

Post by keithmoonhangover »

loaded_gloves wrote:Ergh. Povetkin is a more offensive 'champion' than John Ruiz. What is Hasim Rahman doing in a world title fight?

The WBA's crimes these last decade are off the chart. They need to be lined up against a wall and shot.
It's not Povektin's fault, Hasim's his #1 contender.
leforge
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7790
Joined: 04 Mar 2005, 12:44

Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill

Post by leforge »

smoggy7188 wrote:Its a Klitshcko style card. Massive top of the bill and loads of fillers. Hall/o'Sullivan is a good fight.
They World title bills this is a domestic clash
Poncey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7525
Joined: 21 May 2007, 07:48

Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill

Post by Poncey »

Lol. This is why I don't go to his cards anymore.
gobbles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2682
Joined: 18 Dec 2003, 15:04

Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill

Post by gobbles »

I wonder how this afffects TV production costs.
Sauerland were, after all, the show's promoters and it was ARD that were underwriting much of the cost for an outside boardcast production.
I think most who believe this fight was only on to put on another attractions for fans are completely missing the point. allegedly underwriting everything now.
Post Reply