Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill
Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill
This bill is just beyond a joke.
Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill
Shame...was looking forward to witnessing that one.
Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill
Honestly couldn't see this one happening on this card.
Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill
You not think warren has just pulled the Plug on this fight as so many ticket have been sold ie short changed the fans but people r really only going to see the main fight
Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill
Well the reasoning seems highly eyebrow-raising...........
But what's done is done.
:-)
But what's done is done.
:-)
-
Final round
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02
Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill
I'd be surprised if many of the 'clientele' were excited for this fight anyhow.
-
hitman_hatton1
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6150
- Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57
Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill
30,000 tickets sold and the cheapskate can't even put together a few solid match ups on.
same old same old from fish eyes.
same old same old from fish eyes.
Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill
I am expecting more fighting out of the ring than in it that night!Final round wrote:I'd be surprised if many of the 'clientele' were excited for this fight anyhow.
-
smoggy7188
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 941
- Joined: 27 Oct 2010, 12:27
Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill
"Long List" of undercard fights announced on bunce show tonight apparently.
Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill
Be nothing good!smoggy7188 wrote:"Long List" of undercard fights announced on bunce show tonight apparently.
-
smoggy7188
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 941
- Joined: 27 Oct 2010, 12:27
Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill
Its a Klitshcko style card. Massive top of the bill and loads of fillers. Hall/o'Sullivan is a good fight.
-
oliverfennell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5564
- Joined: 15 Feb 2007, 06:37
Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill
Is there a link detailing the undercard anywhere, since BoxRec still won't detail it?smoggy7188 wrote:Its a Klitshcko style card. Massive top of the bill and loads of fillers. Hall/o'Sullivan is a good fight.
-
Final round
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02
Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill
oliverfennell wrote:Is there a link detailing the undercard anywhere, since BoxRec still won't detail it?smoggy7188 wrote:Its a Klitshcko style card. Massive top of the bill and loads of fillers. Hall/o'Sullivan is a good fight.
Even Boxing Monthly are on it! Two months running

-
loaded_gloves
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 1907
- Joined: 09 Mar 2011, 12:18
Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill
Ergh. Povetkin is a more offensive 'champion' than John Ruiz. What is Hasim Rahman doing in a world title fight?
The WBA's crimes these last decade are off the chart. They need to be lined up against a wall and shot.
The WBA's crimes these last decade are off the chart. They need to be lined up against a wall and shot.
-
Londonirish
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3064
- Joined: 20 Nov 2008, 13:02
Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill
Does any one what the Under card is? who's Fighting?
Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill
Was this fight ever really on the bill?
I don't recall seeing either Povetkin or Rahman in any press conference and despite the almost daily outpourings of information from Warren Towers, I don't recall anything other than the announcement of the fight.
It would add nothing to ticket sales - the numbers travelling from Russia/Germany and the US to watch these two could be counted on the fingers of a one-armed man, while the costs of having them on the undercard would have made a huge dent in the fight revenues. Much better to have the fight in Germany and show it on the channel for the cost of rights only.
I don't recall seeing either Povetkin or Rahman in any press conference and despite the almost daily outpourings of information from Warren Towers, I don't recall anything other than the announcement of the fight.
It would add nothing to ticket sales - the numbers travelling from Russia/Germany and the US to watch these two could be counted on the fingers of a one-armed man, while the costs of having them on the undercard would have made a huge dent in the fight revenues. Much better to have the fight in Germany and show it on the channel for the cost of rights only.
Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill
Spot on was it ever on but they still told fans its on not good enough! But as ARD not broadcasting will all the cost of the live prodcution now be footed by allegedly.earsjohn wrote:Was this fight ever really on the bill?
I don't recall seeing either Povetkin or Rahman in any press conference and despite the almost daily outpourings of information from Warren Towers, I don't recall anything other than the announcement of the fight.
It would add nothing to ticket sales - the numbers travelling from Russia/Germany and the US to watch these two could be counted on the fingers of a one-armed man, while the costs of having them on the undercard would have made a huge dent in the fight revenues. Much better to have the fight in Germany and show it on the channel for the cost of rights only.
-
smoggy7188
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 941
- Joined: 27 Oct 2010, 12:27
Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill
Ronnie Heffron and Bradley Saunders added to bill.
Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill
Against no ones either.smoggy7188 wrote:Ronnie Heffron and Bradley Saunders added to bill.
Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill
No great loss.
I don't care about this Rahman-Povetkin fight, even though I'm a heavyweight fan. Rahman hasn't had a decent win in 7 years. The WBA is a disgrace for making him the mandatory.
I hope Sauerland, with their roster of talented up-and-comers (like Dirks, Masternak, Pulev, Gerber, Woge, etc.) puts on a decent undercard in Hamburg.
I don't care about this Rahman-Povetkin fight, even though I'm a heavyweight fan. Rahman hasn't had a decent win in 7 years. The WBA is a disgrace for making him the mandatory.
I hope Sauerland, with their roster of talented up-and-comers (like Dirks, Masternak, Pulev, Gerber, Woge, etc.) puts on a decent undercard in Hamburg.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17107
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill
It's not Povektin's fault, Hasim's his #1 contender.loaded_gloves wrote:Ergh. Povetkin is a more offensive 'champion' than John Ruiz. What is Hasim Rahman doing in a world title fight?
The WBA's crimes these last decade are off the chart. They need to be lined up against a wall and shot.
Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill
They World title bills this is a domestic clashsmoggy7188 wrote:Its a Klitshcko style card. Massive top of the bill and loads of fillers. Hall/o'Sullivan is a good fight.
Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill
Lol. This is why I don't go to his cards anymore.
Re: Povetkin v Rahman off Haye-Chisora bill
I wonder how this afffects TV production costs.
Sauerland were, after all, the show's promoters and it was ARD that were underwriting much of the cost for an outside boardcast production.
I think most who believe this fight was only on to put on another attractions for fans are completely missing the point. allegedly underwriting everything now.
Sauerland were, after all, the show's promoters and it was ARD that were underwriting much of the cost for an outside boardcast production.
I think most who believe this fight was only on to put on another attractions for fans are completely missing the point. allegedly underwriting everything now.